“睦邻四堂间”:一种远郊闲置宅基地的活用模式——基于上海市奉贤区调研
|
摘要
通过分析上海市奉贤区宅基地活用案例发现,奉贤区改革将宅基地盘活与农村公共服务建设融合,宅基地盘活目标由提升土地利用转变为改善村民生活,丰富宅基地改革含义;宅基地居住功能转变为养老保障、公共服务功能,转换宅基地改革思维。由于缺乏宅基地"三权分置"作为依托,奉贤区宅基地改革无法摆脱公共服务规模狭窄、宅基地盘活数量有限和维持改革持续性艰难的困境,目前仅为尝试阶段。今后,需认定宅基地资格权并调查宅基地闲置情况,促进宅基地改革与宅基地"三权分置"衔接。
Through the case study of the revitalization of rural homesteads in Fengxian District ofShanghai City,it could be found that the activation of rural homesteads was combined with the constructionof rural public service facilities and the goal of activation of rural homesteads was shifted to improving thelives of villagers not just being enhanced land utilization, thus enriching the connotation of rural homesteadreform. In addition, the residential function of the rural homesteads was transformed to the function of careservice and public service, which switched the thought of rural homestead reform. However, due to be shortof support on the "Three Rights(ownership right, qualification right and use right) Separation" of ruralhomesteads, the reform of Fengxian District was only a short-term attempt that could not get out of thedilemma of narrow public service scale, limited number of activated homesteads and difficulty in maintainingthe reform sustainability. In the future, Fengxian District should be properly identified the qualification rightof rural homesteads and taken an inventory of the idle homesteads, so as to promote the engagement of localreform with the "Three Rights Separation" of rural homesteads.
Through the case study of the revitalization of rural homesteads in Fengxian District ofShanghai City,it could be found that the activation of rural homesteads was combined with the constructionof rural public service facilities and the goal of activation of rural homesteads was shifted to improving thelives of villagers not just being enhanced land utilization, thus enriching the connotation of rural homesteadreform. In addition, the residential function of the rural homesteads was transformed to the function of careservice and public service, which switched the thought of rural homestead reform. However, due to be shortof support on the "Three Rights(ownership right, qualification right and use right) Separation" of ruralhomesteads, the reform of Fengxian District was only a short-term attempt that could not get out of thedilemma of narrow public service scale, limited number of activated homesteads and difficulty in maintainingthe reform sustainability. In the future, Fengxian District should be properly identified the qualification rightof rural homesteads and taken an inventory of the idle homesteads, so as to promote the engagement of localreform with the "Three Rights Separation" of rural homesteads.
引文
[1]刘守英,熊雪锋.经济结构变革、村庄转型与宅基地制度变迁--四川省泸县宅基地制度改革案例研究[J].中国农村经济,2018(6):2-20.
[2]刘守英.土地制度与中国发展[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2018.
[3]刘艺.公物法中的物、财产、产权--从德法公物法之客体差异谈起[J].浙江学刊,2010(2):139-146.
[4]孙永军,付坚强.论农村宅基地取得纠纷的表现、原因和处理[J].中国土地科学,2012,26(12):16-21.
[5]孟祥仲,辛宝海.明晰使用产权:解决农村宅基地荒废问题的途径选择[J].农村经济,2006(10):13-15.
[6]欧阳安蛟,蔡锋铭,陈立定.农村宅基地退出机制建立探讨[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(10):26-30.
[7]姜广辉,张凤荣,陈军伟,等.基于Logistic回归模型的北京山区农村居民点变化的驱动力分析[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(5):81-87.
[8]国家土地督察成都局课题组.“连城诀”--成渝统筹城乡改革试验区土地制度创新的分析与建议[J].中国土地,2008(9):34-40.
[9]崔永亮.农村住房保障制度缺失及其未来改善[J].改革,2013(12):95-102.
[10]彭长生,范子英.农户宅基地退出意愿及其影响因素分析--基于安徽省6县1413个农户调查的实证研究[J].经济社会体制比较,2012(2):154-162.
[11]李宁,陈利根,龙开胜.农村宅基地产权制度研究--不完全产权与主体行为关系的分析视角[J].公共管理学报,2014,11(1):39-54.
[12]朱从谋,苑韶峰,李胜男,等.基于发展权与功能损失的农村宅基地流转增值收益分配研究--以义乌市“集地券”为例[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(7):37-44
[13]上官彩霞,冯淑怡,吕沛璐,等.交易费用视角下宅基地置换模式的区域差异及其成因[J].中国人口:资源与环境,2014(4):107-115.
[14]王兆林.户籍制度改革中农户土地退出行为研究:重庆的实证[D].重庆:西南大学,2013.
[15]张勇,汪应宏.农村宅基地退出补偿研究综述[J].中国农业大学学报,2016(3):151-160
[16]陈振,罗遥,欧名豪.宅基地“三权分置”:基本内涵、功能价值与实现路径[J].农村经济,2018(11):40-46.
[17]严金明,迪力沙提,夏方舟.乡村振兴战略实施与宅基地“三权分置”改革的深化[J].改革,2019(1):5-18.
[18]陆杰华,张莉.全面建成小康社会进程中农村老年人的养老风险探究--基于新时代我国社会主要矛盾转型视角[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,32(1):8-14.
[19]赵渺希,王慧芹,刘明欣.集体土地养老支持的区位差异及政策启示--基于广州和佛山地区的实证[J].农业经济问题,2018(3):134-143.
[20]谭荣.集体建设用地市场化进程:现实选择与理论思考[J].中国土地科学,2018(8):1-8.
[21]芦恒,芮东根.“抗逆力”与“公共性”:乡村振兴的双重动力与衰退地域重建[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,36(1):25-34.
[2]刘守英.土地制度与中国发展[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2018.
[3]刘艺.公物法中的物、财产、产权--从德法公物法之客体差异谈起[J].浙江学刊,2010(2):139-146.
[4]孙永军,付坚强.论农村宅基地取得纠纷的表现、原因和处理[J].中国土地科学,2012,26(12):16-21.
[5]孟祥仲,辛宝海.明晰使用产权:解决农村宅基地荒废问题的途径选择[J].农村经济,2006(10):13-15.
[6]欧阳安蛟,蔡锋铭,陈立定.农村宅基地退出机制建立探讨[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(10):26-30.
[7]姜广辉,张凤荣,陈军伟,等.基于Logistic回归模型的北京山区农村居民点变化的驱动力分析[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(5):81-87.
[8]国家土地督察成都局课题组.“连城诀”--成渝统筹城乡改革试验区土地制度创新的分析与建议[J].中国土地,2008(9):34-40.
[9]崔永亮.农村住房保障制度缺失及其未来改善[J].改革,2013(12):95-102.
[10]彭长生,范子英.农户宅基地退出意愿及其影响因素分析--基于安徽省6县1413个农户调查的实证研究[J].经济社会体制比较,2012(2):154-162.
[11]李宁,陈利根,龙开胜.农村宅基地产权制度研究--不完全产权与主体行为关系的分析视角[J].公共管理学报,2014,11(1):39-54.
[12]朱从谋,苑韶峰,李胜男,等.基于发展权与功能损失的农村宅基地流转增值收益分配研究--以义乌市“集地券”为例[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(7):37-44
[13]上官彩霞,冯淑怡,吕沛璐,等.交易费用视角下宅基地置换模式的区域差异及其成因[J].中国人口:资源与环境,2014(4):107-115.
[14]王兆林.户籍制度改革中农户土地退出行为研究:重庆的实证[D].重庆:西南大学,2013.
[15]张勇,汪应宏.农村宅基地退出补偿研究综述[J].中国农业大学学报,2016(3):151-160
[16]陈振,罗遥,欧名豪.宅基地“三权分置”:基本内涵、功能价值与实现路径[J].农村经济,2018(11):40-46.
[17]严金明,迪力沙提,夏方舟.乡村振兴战略实施与宅基地“三权分置”改革的深化[J].改革,2019(1):5-18.
[18]陆杰华,张莉.全面建成小康社会进程中农村老年人的养老风险探究--基于新时代我国社会主要矛盾转型视角[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,32(1):8-14.
[19]赵渺希,王慧芹,刘明欣.集体土地养老支持的区位差异及政策启示--基于广州和佛山地区的实证[J].农业经济问题,2018(3):134-143.
[20]谭荣.集体建设用地市场化进程:现实选择与理论思考[J].中国土地科学,2018(8):1-8.
[21]芦恒,芮东根.“抗逆力”与“公共性”:乡村振兴的双重动力与衰退地域重建[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,36(1):25-34.