内蒙古乌兰察布地区布鲁氏菌体外药物敏感性及耐药机制分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:In vitro drugs susceptibility and resistance mechanism investigation of Brucella isolates from Ulanqab region of Inner Mongolia
  • 作者:刘志国 ; 王妙 ; 李晓燕 ; 塔娜 ; 赵鸿雁 ; 朴东日 ; 赵忠志 ; 李振军
  • 英文作者:LIU Zhi-guo;WANG Miao;LI Xiao-yan;TA Na;ZHAO Hong-yan;PIAO Dong-ri;ZHAO Zhong-zhi;LI Zhen-jun;National Institute of Infectious Diseases Control and Prevention,Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention;Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Central for Comprehensive Disease Control and Prevention;Ulanqab Center for Endemic Disease Control and Prevention;
  • 关键词:布鲁氏菌 ; 药物敏感性 ; 耐药机制
  • 英文关键词:B.melitensis;;drug susceptibility;;resistance mechanism
  • 中文刊名:ZRSZ
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Zoonoses
  • 机构:中国疾病预防控制中心传染病预防控制所传染病预防控制国家重点实验室;内蒙古自治区综合疾病预防控制中心;乌兰察布市地方病防治中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-28 13:17
  • 出版单位:中国人兽共患病学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.35
  • 基金:传染病重大专项(No.2017ZX10303401);; 生物安全重点专项(No.2017YFC1200303);生物安全重点专项(No.2016YFC1200701);; 内蒙古自治区自然科学基金(No.2018MS08004)联合资助~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZRSZ201905006
  • 页数:6
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:35-1284/R
  • 分类号:31-36
摘要
目的调查内蒙古乌兰察布地区分离布鲁氏菌的抗生素药物敏感(耐受)性特征。方法采用E-test法测定了85株布鲁氏菌对13种临床常用药物的敏感性;同时,对利福平和阿奇霉素的耐药机制进行了初步探讨;并采用K-B法对来自全国的149株羊种布鲁氏菌对复方新诺明和利福平的敏感性进行了筛查。结果试验表明布鲁氏菌对阿奇霉素、复方新诺明和利福平耐药菌株数分别为100%(85/85),7.0%(6/85)和1.0%(1/85)。所有菌株对司帕沙星、米诺环素、多西环素、四环素、链霉素、庆大霉素、左氧氟沙星、环丙沙星、头孢吡肟及头孢哌酮舒巴坦均表现为敏感;司帕沙星、米诺环素的MIC_(90)值(0.032μg/mL)最低。所有阿奇霉素耐药菌株的23S rRNA基因的第2632位碱基表现为T→C单位点突变,布鲁氏菌23S rRNA转肽酶中心的T/C点突变可能是一种羊种布鲁氏菌对阿奇霉素耐药的分子机制。K-B法筛查结果表明所有菌株对利福平敏感,25.5%(38/149)的菌株对复方新诺明耐药,耐药菌株分布于18个省市区。结论乌兰察布地区羊种布鲁氏菌耐药较为严重,应定期进行药物敏感性监测。推荐司帕沙星和米诺环素作为一线布病治疗药物。
        The aims of this study is to investigate the antibiotics susceptibilities profiles of Brucella strains obtained from Ulanqab of Inner Mongolia. The susceptibilities of 85 B.melitensis strains to 13 common used antibiotics was detected by E-test method, and resistance mechanism of rifampin and azithromycin were preliminarily examined. Subsequently, susceptibility of 149 B. melitensis strains from China to cotrimoxazole and rifampin were tested using K-B method. The study found that the number of strains resistance to azithromycin, cotrimoxazole and rifampin was 100%(85/85),7.0%(6/85) and 1.0%(1/85), respectively. All of the tested isolates were susceptible to minocycline, sparfloxacin, doxycycline, tetracycline, streptomycin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime and cefoperazone sulbactam. Of them, aparfloxacin and minocycline shows the lowest MIC_(90) value(0.032 μg/mL). The polymorphism of 2632 base T/C in the 23 S rRNA of Brucella spp. was a potential molecular mechanism of B. melitensis in this study resistant to azithromycin. K-B method screen data indicated that all of 149 strains were susceptible to rifampin. Moreover, 25.5%(38/149) of strains were resistance to cotrimoxazole and these resistance strains were distributed in 18 different provinces of China. In conclusion, the situation of antibiotics resistance of B. melitensis clinical isolates was rather serious in Ulanqab region, surveillance of changes in antibiotic susceptible should be regular implemented. Moreover, we suggest that both minocycline and sparfloxacin could be as first-line agents for treatment of brucellosis.
引文
[1] Pappas G,Papadimitriou P,Akritidis N,et al.The new global map of human brucellosis[J].Lancet Infect Dis,2006,6(2):91-99.DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70382-6
    [2] Bayram Y,Korkoca H,Aypak C,et al.Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Brucella isolates from various clinical specimens[J].Int J Med Sci,2011,8(3):198-202.DOI:10.7150/ijms.8.198
    [3] Garcia-Rodriguez JA,Garcia SJ,Trujillano I.Lack of effective bactericidal activity of newquinolones against Brucella spp[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1991,35(4):756-759.DOI:10.1128/AAC.35.4.756
    [4] Tien N,Sung YJ,Chang YC,Y et al.The medical diagnostic approaches with phylogenetic analysis for rare Brucella spp.diagnosis in Taiwan[J].Biomedicine (Taipei),2015,5(2):9.DOI:10.7603/s40681-015-0009-6
    [5] Wang Y,Zhang W,Ke Y,et al.Human brucellosis,a heterogeneously distributed,delayed,and misdiagnosed disease in china[J].Clin Infect Dis,2013,56(5):750-751.DOI:10.1093/cid/cis980
    [6] Parlak M,Guducuoglu H,Bayram Y,et al.Identification and determination of antibioticsusceptibilities of Brucella strains isolated from patients in van,Turkey by conventional and molecular methods[J].Int J Med Sci,2013,10(10):1406-1411.DOI:10.7150/ijms.6565
    [7] Baykam N,Esener H,Ergonul O,et al.In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Brucella species[J].Int J Antimicrob Agents,2004,23(4):405-407.DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.09.024
    [8] Barbosa PR,Reinato SA,Pinto DSMJ,et al.Reduced susceptibility to rifampicin and resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents among Brucella abortus Isolates from Cattle in Brazil[J].PLoS One,2015,10(7):e132532.DOI:10.1371/ journal.pone.0132532
    [9] Sayan M,Kilic S,Uyanik MH.Epidemiological survey of rifampicin resistance in clinic isolates of Brucella melitensis obtained from all regions of Turkey[J].J Infect Chemother,2012,18 (1):41-46.DOI:10.1007/s10156-011-0281-7
    [10] Kinsara A,Al-Mowallad A,Osoba AO.Increasing resistance of Brucellae to co-trimoxazole[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1999,43(6):1531.
    [11] 刘志国,王妙,刘日宏,等.内蒙古自治区乌兰察布市羊种布鲁氏菌HOOF基因分型特征[J].中华流行病学杂志,2017,38(7):954-958.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.07.021
    [12] Marianelli C,Ciuchini F,Tarantino M,et al.Genetic bases of the rifampin resistance phenotype in Brucella spp[J].J Clin Microbiol,2004,42(12):5439-5443.DOI:10.1128 /JCM.42.12.5439-5443.2004
    [13] Gür D,Kocag?z S,Akova M,et al.Comparison of E test to microdilution for determining in vitro activities of antibiotics against Brucella melitensis[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1999,43(9):2337.
    [14] Abdel-Maksoud M,House B,Wasfy M,et al.In vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing of Brucella isolates from Egypt between 1999 and 2007 and evidence of probable rifampin resistance[J].Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob,2012,11(1):24-24.DOI:10.1186/1476-0711-11-24
    [15] López-Merino A,Contreras-Rodríguez A,Migranas-Ortiz R,et al.Susceptibility of Mexican Brucella isolates to moxifloxacin,ciprofloxacin and other antimicrobials used in the treatment of human brucellosis[J].Scand J Infect Dis,2004,36(9):636-638.DOI:10.1080/00365540410020767
    [16] ILhan Z,Solmaz H,Ekin IH.In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Brucella melitensis isolates from sheep in an area endemic for human brucellosis in Turkey[J].J Vet Med Sci,2013,75(8):1035-1040.DOI:10.1292/jvms.12-0163.
    [17] Gattringer KB,Suchomel M,Eder M,et al.Time-dependent effects of rifampicin on Staphylococcal biofilms[J].Int J Artif Organs,2010,33(9):621-626.DOI:10.1177/039139881003300907
    [18] Hashim R,Ahmad N,Mohamed ZJ,et al.Identification and in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Brucella species isolated from human brucellosis[J].Int J Microbiol,2014,2014:596245.DOI:10.1155/2014/596245
    [19] Rahil AI,Othman M,Ibrahim W,et al.Brucellosis in Qatar:A retrospective cohort study[J].Qatar Med J,2014,16(1):25-30.DOI:10.5339/qmj.2014.4
    [20] Colmenero JD,Fernandez-Gallardo LC,Agundez JA,et al.Possible implications of doxycycline-rifampin interaction for treatment of brucellosis[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1994,38(12):2798-2802.DOI:10.1128/AAC.38.12.2798
    [21] Arabi H,Pakzad I,Nasrollahi A,et al.Sulfonamide resistance genes (sul) M in extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) and Non-ESBL producing escherichia coli isolated from Iranian hospitals[J].Jundishapur J Microbiol,2015,8(7):e19961.DOI:10.5812/jjm.19961v2
    [22] Huovinen P,Sundstr?m L,Swedberg G,et al.Trimethoprim and sulfonamide resistance[J].Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy,1995,39(2):279-289.
    [23] Agwuh KN,Macgowan A.Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the tetracyclines including glycylcyclines[J].J Antimicrob Chemother,2006,58(2):256-265.DOI:10.1093/jac/dkl224
    [24] Solís García del Pozo J,Solera J.Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis[J].PLoS One,2012,7(2):e32090.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0032090
    [25] Akova M,Gür D,Livermore DM,Kocag?z T,et al.In vitro activities of antibiotics alone and in combination against Brucella melitensis at neutral and acidic pHs[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1999,43(5):1298-300.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700