城市不同排水除涝标准衔接方法的探讨
|
摘要
为了有效解决城市内涝问题,需要对管道排水标准和河道排涝标准的合理衔接做进一步的探讨。破坏率分析法及相融性分析法都是现阶段管道排水标准与河道排涝标准衔接研究中较为常用的两种方法,选择江苏省宿迁市作为研究区域,运用这两种方法从河道顶托和平衡降雨强度两个角度对宿迁市排水与排涝的重现期衔接问题进行研究,发现两种重现期分析方法得到的衔接结果总体相近,仅在管道重现期为2 a的低重现期下有一定偏差。建议两种重现期分析法在实际运用中可以相互比对验证,为城市排水防涝系统的建设与完善提供科学参考。
In order to solve urban waterlogging problems effectively,it is necessary to study further about the reasonable relationship of the pipe drainage and river drainage. The damage rate method and the coherence method are usually used in the study of the relationship between the pipes drainage and river drainage nowadays. Choosing Suqian city of Jiangsu Province as study area,we apply these two methods in the study area to discuss the relationship between the pipes drainage and river drainage considering the influence of river water level and the balance of rainfall intensity. Results made by these two methods are generally similar,but when the standard of the pipes drainage is two years which is a low recurrence period,there occurs certain deviation. This research recommends that these two methods could be references for each other in practical application and offers a scientific guidance to the further construction and improvement of the drainage and waterlogging system.
In order to solve urban waterlogging problems effectively,it is necessary to study further about the reasonable relationship of the pipe drainage and river drainage. The damage rate method and the coherence method are usually used in the study of the relationship between the pipes drainage and river drainage nowadays. Choosing Suqian city of Jiangsu Province as study area,we apply these two methods in the study area to discuss the relationship between the pipes drainage and river drainage considering the influence of river water level and the balance of rainfall intensity. Results made by these two methods are generally similar,but when the standard of the pipes drainage is two years which is a low recurrence period,there occurs certain deviation. This research recommends that these two methods could be references for each other in practical application and offers a scientific guidance to the further construction and improvement of the drainage and waterlogging system.
引文
[1]张高嫄,高斌,庄宝玉.城市排水规划与排涝规划的衔接方法研究[C]//.中国土木工程学会水工业分会排水委员会,全国排水委员会2015年年会论文集,北京:全国排水委员会2015年年会论文集,2015.
[2]高学珑.城市排涝标准与排水标准衔接的探讨[J].给水排水,2014,40(6):18-21.
[3]中华人民共和国水利部.SL4-2013农田排水工程技术规范[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2013.
[4]张辰,支霞辉,朱广汉,等.新版《室外排水设计规范》局部修订解读[J].给水排水,2012,38(2):34-38.
[5]张惠锋.城镇排水标准与区域除涝标准衔接的研究进展[J].净水技术,2016,35(3):123-125.
[6]沈瑞.城市河道排涝与管渠排水标准衔接研究[J].工程与建设,2014(4):455-457.
[7]王永,燕少平.城市排水与排涝计算研究[J].江淮水利科技,2006(3):15-17.
[8]刘俊,俞芳琴,张建涛,等.城市管道排水与河道排涝设计标准的关系[J].中国给水排水,2007,23(2):43-45.
[9]贾卫红,李琼芳.上海市排水标准与除涝标准衔接研究[J].中国给水排水,2015,31(15):122-126.
[10]马姗姗.海口市水利排涝与市政排水关系分析[D].天津:天津大学,2014.
[11]黄建文.南昌市管道排水与河道排涝设计标准衔接研究[D].南昌:南昌大学,2012.
[12]李卫东,徐向阳.不同破坏率下管道排水与河道排涝标准衔接探讨[J].中国农村水利水电,2015(11):182-184.
[13]陈庆沙,黄友谊,戴贤波,等.厦门市管网排水与河道排涝标准关系分析[J].水电能源科学,2014,32(10):60-62.
[14]谢华,黄介生.城市化地区市政排水与区域排涝关系研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2007,26(5):10-13+26.
[15]范威,黄程.城建部门与水利部门排涝标准差别[J].水利规划与设计,2013(5):20-22.
[16]曹利军,徐曙光.城市排水与河道排涝标准的衔接计算方法探讨[J].安徽水利水电职业技术学院学报,2012,12(3):16-18.
[2]高学珑.城市排涝标准与排水标准衔接的探讨[J].给水排水,2014,40(6):18-21.
[3]中华人民共和国水利部.SL4-2013农田排水工程技术规范[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2013.
[4]张辰,支霞辉,朱广汉,等.新版《室外排水设计规范》局部修订解读[J].给水排水,2012,38(2):34-38.
[5]张惠锋.城镇排水标准与区域除涝标准衔接的研究进展[J].净水技术,2016,35(3):123-125.
[6]沈瑞.城市河道排涝与管渠排水标准衔接研究[J].工程与建设,2014(4):455-457.
[7]王永,燕少平.城市排水与排涝计算研究[J].江淮水利科技,2006(3):15-17.
[8]刘俊,俞芳琴,张建涛,等.城市管道排水与河道排涝设计标准的关系[J].中国给水排水,2007,23(2):43-45.
[9]贾卫红,李琼芳.上海市排水标准与除涝标准衔接研究[J].中国给水排水,2015,31(15):122-126.
[10]马姗姗.海口市水利排涝与市政排水关系分析[D].天津:天津大学,2014.
[11]黄建文.南昌市管道排水与河道排涝设计标准衔接研究[D].南昌:南昌大学,2012.
[12]李卫东,徐向阳.不同破坏率下管道排水与河道排涝标准衔接探讨[J].中国农村水利水电,2015(11):182-184.
[13]陈庆沙,黄友谊,戴贤波,等.厦门市管网排水与河道排涝标准关系分析[J].水电能源科学,2014,32(10):60-62.
[14]谢华,黄介生.城市化地区市政排水与区域排涝关系研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2007,26(5):10-13+26.
[15]范威,黄程.城建部门与水利部门排涝标准差别[J].水利规划与设计,2013(5):20-22.
[16]曹利军,徐曙光.城市排水与河道排涝标准的衔接计算方法探讨[J].安徽水利水电职业技术学院学报,2012,12(3):16-18.