陶渊明农事诗作中所见渊明思想
|
摘要
陶渊明的农事诗作不等同于其"田园诗",从农事诗作的角度来研究陶渊明的精神,是一个不容忽视的角度。在陶渊明的农事诗作中,可见其亲身耕作、乐于农事,并深深体会到农人的辛苦,由此形成其对农人发自内心的亲切感情,并常引农人为同调和知己;在农事诗中,也可见陶渊明与孔孟轻视劳作的思想不同,但他对儒家思想是有矛盾的;在陶渊明农事诗作中,可见其秉持的是原始道家精神,这是与当时魏晋名士们不同的。由此可见,陶渊明晚年对檀道济馈赠"麾而去之",正是其内在刚健精神品格的表现。
Tao Yuanming's georgics is not equal to the "Pastoral", study of Tao Yuanming's spirit from the point of view of georgics, is a point of view can not be ignored. In Tao Yuanming's agricultural poetry,you can see that he willing to farming, and deeply appreciate the farmer hard, thus forming warm feelings to the farmers from the bottom of his heartand and often taked the farmers as friend; In georgics, we can see that Tao Yuanming and Confucius Mencius attitude to despise labor is not the same, but he is contradictory to Confucianism; in georgics of Tao Yuanming, we can see that he in sisted on the idea of the original Taois. This is different from the people in the times of Wei and Jin Dynasties. Thus, Tao Yuanming refused to tan Daoji relief, Is a strong and firm performance in his heart.
Tao Yuanming's georgics is not equal to the "Pastoral", study of Tao Yuanming's spirit from the point of view of georgics, is a point of view can not be ignored. In Tao Yuanming's agricultural poetry,you can see that he willing to farming, and deeply appreciate the farmer hard, thus forming warm feelings to the farmers from the bottom of his heartand and often taked the farmers as friend; In georgics, we can see that Tao Yuanming and Confucius Mencius attitude to despise labor is not the same, but he is contradictory to Confucianism; in georgics of Tao Yuanming, we can see that he in sisted on the idea of the original Taois. This is different from the people in the times of Wei and Jin Dynasties. Thus, Tao Yuanming refused to tan Daoji relief, Is a strong and firm performance in his heart.
引文
[1]袁行霈:陶渊明集笺注[M].(北京)中华书局.2003.
[2]逯钦立校注:陶渊明集[M].(北京)中华书局.1979.
[3]徐复观:中国艺术精神[M].(上海)华东师范大学出版社.2001.
[4]何晓云:陶渊明农事诗初探(J).兰州教育学院学报(J).2013(6).
[5]范学新:陶渊明田园诗与《诗经》农事诗之承传(J).伊犁师范学院学报.2003(6).
[6]杜治伟:从陶渊明诗文中的典故看《论语》对陶渊明的影响(J).琼州学院学报.2015(6).
[7]袁行霈:陶渊明与晋宋之际的政治风云(J).中国社会科学.1990(2).
[8]邓小军:陶渊明政治品节的见证——颜延之《陶征士诔并序》笺证(J).北京大学学报(哲社版).2005(5).
[9]莫励锋:颜延之《陶征士诔并序》在陶渊明接受史上的地位(J).学术月刊.2012(1).
[10]邹平、周晓琳:陶渊明拒绝檀道济馈赠辨析——兼及陶渊明的自卑心理(J).长江论坛.2008(3)
1.[明]钟伯敬、谭元春评选《古诗归》卷九。转引自袁行霈《陶渊明集笺注》,第86页。
2.本文所引陶诗系年皆按袁行霈先生说法。见袁行霈《陶渊明集笺注》“陶渊明作品系年一览”。
1.见逯校注《陶集》附录一“关于陶渊明”。
1.徐复观语。见《中国艺术精神》,第283页。
2《.世说新语·言语第二》。
1.见袁行霈《陶渊明与晋宋之际的政治风云》、邓小军《陶渊明政治品节的见证--颜延之〈陶征士诔并序〉笺证》、莫励锋《颜延之〈陶征士诔并序〉在陶渊明接受史上的地位》等文章。
2.见邹平、周晓琳的文章《陶渊明拒绝檀道济馈赠辨析--兼及陶渊明的自卑心理》。
[2]逯钦立校注:陶渊明集[M].(北京)中华书局.1979.
[3]徐复观:中国艺术精神[M].(上海)华东师范大学出版社.2001.
[4]何晓云:陶渊明农事诗初探(J).兰州教育学院学报(J).2013(6).
[5]范学新:陶渊明田园诗与《诗经》农事诗之承传(J).伊犁师范学院学报.2003(6).
[6]杜治伟:从陶渊明诗文中的典故看《论语》对陶渊明的影响(J).琼州学院学报.2015(6).
[7]袁行霈:陶渊明与晋宋之际的政治风云(J).中国社会科学.1990(2).
[8]邓小军:陶渊明政治品节的见证——颜延之《陶征士诔并序》笺证(J).北京大学学报(哲社版).2005(5).
[9]莫励锋:颜延之《陶征士诔并序》在陶渊明接受史上的地位(J).学术月刊.2012(1).
[10]邹平、周晓琳:陶渊明拒绝檀道济馈赠辨析——兼及陶渊明的自卑心理(J).长江论坛.2008(3)
1.[明]钟伯敬、谭元春评选《古诗归》卷九。转引自袁行霈《陶渊明集笺注》,第86页。
2.本文所引陶诗系年皆按袁行霈先生说法。见袁行霈《陶渊明集笺注》“陶渊明作品系年一览”。
1.见逯校注《陶集》附录一“关于陶渊明”。
1.徐复观语。见《中国艺术精神》,第283页。
2《.世说新语·言语第二》。
1.见袁行霈《陶渊明与晋宋之际的政治风云》、邓小军《陶渊明政治品节的见证--颜延之〈陶征士诔并序〉笺证》、莫励锋《颜延之〈陶征士诔并序〉在陶渊明接受史上的地位》等文章。
2.见邹平、周晓琳的文章《陶渊明拒绝檀道济馈赠辨析--兼及陶渊明的自卑心理》。