海南自由贸易港法律制度创新建设问题探讨
|
摘要
海南自由贸易港的建设要以法律制度为依托,同时要以法律制度创新来推进。法律制度创新能够除旧布新,服务于良好营商环境的建设目标;法律制度创新能够发挥制度优势,以先进制度促进社会经济发展,巩固自贸港的改革成果;法律制度创新对于提升海南自由贸易港法治化水平等也具有重要意义。海南自贸港在法律制度创新中不仅要处理好中央立法权和地方立法权、政府管制和市场自治、公法责任和私法责任、国家政策和国家法律等方面的关系,还要选择好恰当的创新路径,包括以法治实现为目标,以制度激励社会公众参与公共治理和完善社会纠纷解决机制等,最终实现海南自由贸易港建设的良性发展。
The construction of Hainan Free Trade Port needs to rely on the legal system,and also needs the promotion of legal innovation.Legal innovation can bring forth the new and reach the goal of a good business environment.Legal innovation can give full play to institutional advantages,promote social and economic development with advanced systems,and consolidate the reform achievements.At the same time,institutional innovation is also of great significance for improving the social and economic efficiency and the level of legalization of Hainan Free Trade Port.In the process of the innovation,we should not only to deal with the central authority and local legislative power,government regulation and market autonomy,public law responsibility and private law responsibility,and also the national policies and laws of the state,in order to choose the proper innovation path,which including the goal of rulingby law,the system to stimulate social public participation in public governance and perfect social dispute resolution mechanism,etc.,so as to realize the benign development of Hainan Free Trade Port.
The construction of Hainan Free Trade Port needs to rely on the legal system,and also needs the promotion of legal innovation.Legal innovation can bring forth the new and reach the goal of a good business environment.Legal innovation can give full play to institutional advantages,promote social and economic development with advanced systems,and consolidate the reform achievements.At the same time,institutional innovation is also of great significance for improving the social and economic efficiency and the level of legalization of Hainan Free Trade Port.In the process of the innovation,we should not only to deal with the central authority and local legislative power,government regulation and market autonomy,public law responsibility and private law responsibility,and also the national policies and laws of the state,in order to choose the proper innovation path,which including the goal of rulingby law,the system to stimulate social public participation in public governance and perfect social dispute resolution mechanism,etc.,so as to realize the benign development of Hainan Free Trade Port.
引文
[1]习近平.在庆祝海南建省办经济特区30周年大会上的讲话[M],北京:人民出版社,2018.
[2][3]刘赐贵.关于深入学习习近平总书记“4·13”重要讲话精神的十点认识[N],海南日报2018-10-17.
[4]李泓冰.人民网评:优化营商环境正当时[EB/OL].人民网,http://opinion.people.com.cn/n1/2018/0306/c1003-29850495.html.2018-3-6.
[5]李善民,习超,万自强.罗尔斯公司收购案与美国的安全审查--美国的外资并购审查规制框架及其对我国的启示[J],中山大学学报(社会科学版),2014(1).
[6]李军.外国投资安全审查中国家安全风险的判断[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2016(4).
[7]Randall Peerenboom,China’s Long March Toward Rule of Law[M],Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002:251.
[8]熊丙万.中国民法学的效率意识[J].中国法学,2018(5).
[9]杨晓,张玉玲.制度效率与创新驱动[J].中国金融.2017(15).
[10]张志铭,王美舒.中国语境下营商环境的评估[J].中国应用法学.2018(5).
[11]Friedrich Hayek.The Use Of Knowledge in Society[J],American Economic Review1945(35):519-530.
[12]冯洋.论地方立法权的范围[J].行政法学研究.2017(2).
[13]张千帆.国家主权与地方自治[M].北京:中国民主法治出版社,2012:320.
[14]杨志壮.公司法规范体系中的私法责任与公法责任[J].齐鲁学刊,2013(3).
[15]苏永钦.民事立法与公私法的接轨[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
[16][19]张文显.新时代全面依法治国的思想、方略和实践[J].中国法学,2017(6).
[17]习近平.关于《中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干问题的重大决定》的说明[EB/OL].新华网,http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2014-10/28/content_2771717_3.htm.2014-10-28.
[18]金梦.立法性决定的界定与要求[J].中国法学,2018(3).
[20]吴元元.公共执法中的私人力量--悬赏举报制度的法律经济学重述[J].法学,2013(9).
[21]桑本谦.私人之间的监控与惩罚--一个经济学的进路[M].山东:山东人民出版社,2005:167.
[22]徐昕.法律的私人执行[J].法学研究.2004(1).
[2][3]刘赐贵.关于深入学习习近平总书记“4·13”重要讲话精神的十点认识[N],海南日报2018-10-17.
[4]李泓冰.人民网评:优化营商环境正当时[EB/OL].人民网,http://opinion.people.com.cn/n1/2018/0306/c1003-29850495.html.2018-3-6.
[5]李善民,习超,万自强.罗尔斯公司收购案与美国的安全审查--美国的外资并购审查规制框架及其对我国的启示[J],中山大学学报(社会科学版),2014(1).
[6]李军.外国投资安全审查中国家安全风险的判断[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2016(4).
[7]Randall Peerenboom,China’s Long March Toward Rule of Law[M],Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002:251.
[8]熊丙万.中国民法学的效率意识[J].中国法学,2018(5).
[9]杨晓,张玉玲.制度效率与创新驱动[J].中国金融.2017(15).
[10]张志铭,王美舒.中国语境下营商环境的评估[J].中国应用法学.2018(5).
[11]Friedrich Hayek.The Use Of Knowledge in Society[J],American Economic Review1945(35):519-530.
[12]冯洋.论地方立法权的范围[J].行政法学研究.2017(2).
[13]张千帆.国家主权与地方自治[M].北京:中国民主法治出版社,2012:320.
[14]杨志壮.公司法规范体系中的私法责任与公法责任[J].齐鲁学刊,2013(3).
[15]苏永钦.民事立法与公私法的接轨[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
[16][19]张文显.新时代全面依法治国的思想、方略和实践[J].中国法学,2017(6).
[17]习近平.关于《中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干问题的重大决定》的说明[EB/OL].新华网,http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2014-10/28/content_2771717_3.htm.2014-10-28.
[18]金梦.立法性决定的界定与要求[J].中国法学,2018(3).
[20]吴元元.公共执法中的私人力量--悬赏举报制度的法律经济学重述[J].法学,2013(9).
[21]桑本谦.私人之间的监控与惩罚--一个经济学的进路[M].山东:山东人民出版社,2005:167.
[22]徐昕.法律的私人执行[J].法学研究.2004(1).