工程教育认证背景下课程设计教学环节的改革新思路
|
摘要
基于工程教育专业认证学生中心、成果导向、持续改进3个基本理念,从课程设计教学环节中质量标准、大纲、学生日志、教师记录、成果考核及课程设计小结等方面,研究工程教育专业认证背景下课程设计教学环节改革新思路,使课程设计教学环节有效支撑全体学生的"毕业要求"。
The curricula system is one of seven grade I indexes in China Engineering Education Accreditation(CEEA). The curriculum designing can train abilities of programming and problem solving for all students. Based on the three key ideas of CEEA, which are students centered, outcome-based education and continuous quality improvement, the reform of curriculum designing teaching links is researched from quality standard, curriculum, student journal, teacher record, achievement test and summary. The objective is to support the reaching degree of graduate attribute profiles.
The curricula system is one of seven grade I indexes in China Engineering Education Accreditation(CEEA). The curriculum designing can train abilities of programming and problem solving for all students. Based on the three key ideas of CEEA, which are students centered, outcome-based education and continuous quality improvement, the reform of curriculum designing teaching links is researched from quality standard, curriculum, student journal, teacher record, achievement test and summary. The objective is to support the reaching degree of graduate attribute profiles.
引文
[1]吴启迪.稳步推进专业认证工作提升工程教育国际竞争力[J].中国高等教育,2009(2):17-19.
[2]胡德鑫.德国工程教育专业认证制度的变迁逻辑及其启示:基于历史制度主义的分析范式[J].高校教育管理,2017(6):74-82.
[3]陈平.专业认证理念推进工科专业建设内涵式发展[J].中国大学教育,2014(1):42-47.
[4]张颖捷,张洪文,姜彦.浅谈工程教育专业认证背景下学生能力的培养[J].广东化工,2016(19):205-206.
[5]刘向荣,吴晓洁.专业认证导向下我国高校工科专业培养目标设定研究:以我国高水平大学为例[J].河北工业大学学报:社会科学版,2017:1-7.
[6]Kozanitis A, Desbiens J F. Canadian Engineering Students'Motivation in the Context of a Shift Toward Student-Centered TeachingMethodsinanOutcome-BasedEducation[J].International Journal of Engineering Education, 2016, 32(5):1847-1858.
[7]孙晶,张伟,任宗金,等.工程教育专业认证毕业要求达成度的成果导向评价[J].清华大学教育研究,2017(4):117-124.
[8]段雄春.应用型本科教育课程设置与开发:基于OBE教育理念[J].东莞理工学院学报,2017(6):104-107.
[9]Carrick R, Czekanski A. A review of outcome-based education and the use of engineering design competitions to improve underrepresentedattributes[J].InternationalJournalof Engineering Education, 2017, 33(4):1180-1188.
[10]李志义.解析工程教育专业认证的持续改进理念[J].中国高等教育,2015(Z3):33-35.
[11]刘勤安,邢辉,吴桐辉.工程教育专业认证背景下的师资队伍建设[J].航海教育研究,2017(1):29-33.
[12]尤园,王彦丹,谢鸿全.西方四国工程教育专业认证标准的比较研究[J].高等教育研究学报,2017(2):73-79.
[2]胡德鑫.德国工程教育专业认证制度的变迁逻辑及其启示:基于历史制度主义的分析范式[J].高校教育管理,2017(6):74-82.
[3]陈平.专业认证理念推进工科专业建设内涵式发展[J].中国大学教育,2014(1):42-47.
[4]张颖捷,张洪文,姜彦.浅谈工程教育专业认证背景下学生能力的培养[J].广东化工,2016(19):205-206.
[5]刘向荣,吴晓洁.专业认证导向下我国高校工科专业培养目标设定研究:以我国高水平大学为例[J].河北工业大学学报:社会科学版,2017:1-7.
[6]Kozanitis A, Desbiens J F. Canadian Engineering Students'Motivation in the Context of a Shift Toward Student-Centered TeachingMethodsinanOutcome-BasedEducation[J].International Journal of Engineering Education, 2016, 32(5):1847-1858.
[7]孙晶,张伟,任宗金,等.工程教育专业认证毕业要求达成度的成果导向评价[J].清华大学教育研究,2017(4):117-124.
[8]段雄春.应用型本科教育课程设置与开发:基于OBE教育理念[J].东莞理工学院学报,2017(6):104-107.
[9]Carrick R, Czekanski A. A review of outcome-based education and the use of engineering design competitions to improve underrepresentedattributes[J].InternationalJournalof Engineering Education, 2017, 33(4):1180-1188.
[10]李志义.解析工程教育专业认证的持续改进理念[J].中国高等教育,2015(Z3):33-35.
[11]刘勤安,邢辉,吴桐辉.工程教育专业认证背景下的师资队伍建设[J].航海教育研究,2017(1):29-33.
[12]尤园,王彦丹,谢鸿全.西方四国工程教育专业认证标准的比较研究[J].高等教育研究学报,2017(2):73-79.