经皮椎弓根钉与传统后路钉棒内固定疗效分析

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Curative effect analysis of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and traditional posterior screw rod fixation 作者：徐雄 ; 钱腾飞 ; 邱学红 ; 姚金培 ; 冯富泉 ; 李加俊 英文作者：Xu Xiong;Qian Tengfei;Qiu Xuehong;Yao Jinpei;Feng Fuquan;Li Jiajun;The Second Surgical Department,the People's Hospital of Mengzi City,Honghe Prefecture,Yunnan Province; 关键词：经皮椎弓根钉 ; 开放手术内固定 ; 有效性 英文关键词：Percutaneous pedicle screw;;Open surgery internal fixation;;Effectiveness 中文刊名：XCYS 英文刊名：Chinese Community Doctors 机构：云南省红河州蒙自市人民医院外二科; 出版日期：2016-09-20 14:40 出版单位：中国社区医师 年：2016 期：v.32 语种：中文; 页：XCYS201626033 页数：2 CN：26 ISSN：22-1405/R 分类号：58-59

摘要

目的:探讨经皮椎弓根钉的方法和传统后路钉棒对胸腰椎骨折患者的疗效对比。方法:收治胸腰椎骨折的患者58例,对照组实施传统的开放手术内固定的方式进行治疗,观察组采用经皮椎弓根钉的方式进行治疗,对比两组临床治疗的效果、手术的时间、出血量以及切口长度等项目。结果:观察组的治疗效果要更加显著,治疗的时间也较短。结论:对胸腰椎骨折的患者实施经皮椎弓根钉治疗的方式,能够有效提高治疗的有效性,缩短患者治疗的时长,更好地提高患者的生存质量。
        Objective:To investigate the efficacy of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and traditional posterior screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.Methods:58 patients with thoracolumbar fractures were selected.The control group was treated with traditional open surgery internal fixation,while the observation group was treated by the method of percutaneous pedicle screw.The effect of clinical treatment,operation time,amount of bleeding and length of incision were compared between groups.Results:The treatment effect of the observation group was more significant and the treatment time was shorter.Conclusion:The treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with percutaneous pedicle screw can effectively improve the effectiveness of treatment,shorten the duration of treatment,and better improve the quality of life of patients.

引文

[1]蔡斌,张文捷,张震祥,等.经皮椎弓根钉治疗单椎体A型胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效[J]中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2015,(5):456-459
    [2]熊永发,宁旭,闫飞,等.经皮椎弓根钉内固定与开放手术内固定治疗老年胸腰椎骨折的疗效对比[J].中国老年学杂志,2016(4):916-917.
    [3]史航,朱裕成,马军,等.微创经皮椎弓根钉内固定联合伤椎椎体植骨治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志2016,(5):513-514.