农村留守儿童生活质量状况及影响因素
|
摘要
目的:了解农村留守儿童生活质量并探讨其影响因素。方法:采用儿童少年生活质量量表(CQOL)和自编的一般情况调查表对901名农村中小学生进行调查与分析。结果:有16.5%的留守儿童生活质量处于差和较差等级,且留守儿童生活质量在总分及各维度上显著低于非留守儿童(t=-1.979,-2.647,-2.052,-2.406,-2.042;P<0.05)。经多元回归分析发现,成绩、与父母联系频率、和照顾者聊天频率、照顾者管教程度均影响其社会心理功能得分(t=3.849,-3.402,-2.943,-2.678,4.008;P<0.05),成绩影响其生理心理健康得分(t=2.580,P<0.01),父母受教育程度与和照顾者聊天频率影响其生活环境得分(t=-3.727,4.478,P<0.001),与父母联系频率、和照顾者聊天频率、父母期待获得的学历、照顾者的受教育程度影响其生活质量满意度得分(t=-2.749,-4.474,3.117,2.655;P<0.05),与父母联系频率、和照顾者聊天频率、照顾者管教程度、照顾者的受教育程度、父母期待获得的学历、父母受教育程度影响其生活质量总分(t=-3.067,-4.098,-2.789,4.089,2.334,2.655;P<0.05)。结论:农村留守儿童生活质量低于非留守儿童,学习成绩、与父母联系频率、和照顾者聊天频率、照顾者管教程度、照顾者的受教育程度、父母期待获得的学历、父母受教育程度等因素都在一定程度上影响留守儿童生活质量。
Objective:To explore the quality of life and influencing factor of left-behind child.Methods:By using homemade general situation questionnaire and Children and Adolescents Quality of Life Scale(CQOL),the quality of life of 901 left-behind child in rural areas were assessed.Results:16.5 percent of left-behind children reported poor quality of life,and the quality of life of left-behind children is significantly lower than that of non-left-behind children in terms of overall score and each dimension(t=-1.979,-2.647,-2.052,-2.406,-2.042;P<0.05),The research results showed that grade,the frequency of contacting parents,the frequency of chatting with caregivers,and the level of discipline of caregivers influenced psychosocial function(t=3.849,-3.402,-2.943,-2.678,4.008;P <0.05),Grade influenced physical mental health(t=2.580,P<0.01),The education of parents and the frequency of chatting with caregivers influenced living environment(t=-3.727,4.478,P<0.001),The frequency of contacting parents,the frequency of chatting with caregivers,the degree parents expected and the education of caregivers influenced life satisfaction(t=-2.749,-4.474,3.117,2.655;P<0.05),The frequency of contacting parents,the frequency of chatting with caregivers,the level of discipline of caregivers,the education of caregivers,the degree parents expected and the education of parents influenced total quality of life(t=-3.067,-4.098,-2.789,4.089,2.334,2.655;P<0.05).Conclusion:The quality of life of left-behind children in rural areas is lower than that of non-left-behind children,The influencing factors of the quality of life of left-behind children are grade,the frequency of contacting parents,the frequency of chatting with caregivers,the level of discipline of caregivers,the education of caregivers,the degree parents expected and the education of parents.
Objective:To explore the quality of life and influencing factor of left-behind child.Methods:By using homemade general situation questionnaire and Children and Adolescents Quality of Life Scale(CQOL),the quality of life of 901 left-behind child in rural areas were assessed.Results:16.5 percent of left-behind children reported poor quality of life,and the quality of life of left-behind children is significantly lower than that of non-left-behind children in terms of overall score and each dimension(t=-1.979,-2.647,-2.052,-2.406,-2.042;P<0.05),The research results showed that grade,the frequency of contacting parents,the frequency of chatting with caregivers,and the level of discipline of caregivers influenced psychosocial function(t=3.849,-3.402,-2.943,-2.678,4.008;P <0.05),Grade influenced physical mental health(t=2.580,P<0.01),The education of parents and the frequency of chatting with caregivers influenced living environment(t=-3.727,4.478,P<0.001),The frequency of contacting parents,the frequency of chatting with caregivers,the degree parents expected and the education of caregivers influenced life satisfaction(t=-2.749,-4.474,3.117,2.655;P<0.05),The frequency of contacting parents,the frequency of chatting with caregivers,the level of discipline of caregivers,the education of caregivers,the degree parents expected and the education of parents influenced total quality of life(t=-3.067,-4.098,-2.789,4.089,2.334,2.655;P<0.05).Conclusion:The quality of life of left-behind children in rural areas is lower than that of non-left-behind children,The influencing factors of the quality of life of left-behind children are grade,the frequency of contacting parents,the frequency of chatting with caregivers,the level of discipline of caregivers,the education of caregivers,the degree parents expected and the education of parents.
引文
[1]The Whoqol Group,Soc Sci Med,1998,46(12):486
[2]姚伟,关永春.儿童教育与儿童的生活质量[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,54(2):140-144
[3]中华全国妇女联合会.全国农村留守儿童状况研究报告(节选)[J].中国妇运,2008,5(6):34-37
[4]Liu Xiao,Zhou Chunyan,Huang Hai,et al.Comparison of life satisfaction and subjective well-being among different types of left-behind children[J].China Journal of Health Psychology,2017,25(12):1889-1894
[5]Fu Peng,Ling Yu.The influence of life events and social resources on left-behind children life satiafaction[J].China Journal of Health Psychology,2017,25(6):853-858
[6]窦东梅,蒙衡.农村留守小学生生活质量的个人家庭影响因素分析[J].中国学校卫生,2008,10(29):921-922
[7]幸箐筠,钟晓妮,杨国婧.“留守”对重庆市儿童生活质量的影响[J].第二军医大学学报,2016,37(4):424-428
[8]高菲菲,高占良,邓梅洁.山东省和四川省留守儿童生活质量及影响因素分析[J].重庆医学,2015,44(16):2242-2244
[9]杨秀清.福清市中小学留守儿童生活质量调查分析[J].福建师大福清分校学报,2012,32(4):112-116
[10]沈林,杨俊敏,毕存箭.喀什农村少数民族留守儿童中小学生生活质量状况[J].中国学校卫生,2012,33(6):736-738
[11]邓冰,郭丽芳,王慧群.贵州山区10-14岁留守儿童生活质量状况分析[J].中国学校卫生,2011,32(5):610-611
[12]王莉,徐伟亚,王锋,等.农村留守儿童生活质量及与自尊和个性的关系[J].精神医学杂志,2011,24(3):186-188
[13]王鑫.留守儿童生命质量的研究进展[J].中国社会医学杂志,2010,27(2):90-92
[14]吴汉荣,刘普林,蒙衡.儿少生活质量量表信效度分析及全国常模的制定[J].中国学校卫生,2006,27(1):18-21
[15]李佳樾,何莉,郭金仙,等.甘肃农村留守儿童生活质量现状分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2014,22(12):1308-1310
[16]邓冰,郭丽芳,王慧群.贵州山区10-14岁留守儿童生活质量状况分析[J].中国学校卫生,2011,32(5):610-611
[17]张敏.淮北市农村初中留守儿童生活质量现状分析[J].中国学校卫生2008,29(1):12-14
[18]Yu Yongting,Zhang Fuchang.Study on the subjective well-being of“left-at-home children”and the affecting factors[J].China Journal of Health Psychology,2010,18(6):738-741
[19]陈静仪,方耀华,蒋轶.广州市儿童青少年生活质量现状调查[J].中国学校卫生,2009,30(7):647-648
[20]胡明月,李嫱,王文蔚.温州市儿童青少年生活质量状况及影响因素分析[J].卫生研究,2010,39(6):776-778
[21]Liang Ting,Zheng Lili,Qin Kai,et al.Subjective well-being of left-behind children in Guangzhou[J].China Journal of Health Psychology,2014,22(4):632-634
[22]Su S,Li X,Lin D,et al.Psychological adjustment among leftbehind children in rural China:The role of parental migration and parent-child communication[J].Child Care Health Dev,2013,39(2):162-170
[2]姚伟,关永春.儿童教育与儿童的生活质量[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,54(2):140-144
[3]中华全国妇女联合会.全国农村留守儿童状况研究报告(节选)[J].中国妇运,2008,5(6):34-37
[4]Liu Xiao,Zhou Chunyan,Huang Hai,et al.Comparison of life satisfaction and subjective well-being among different types of left-behind children[J].China Journal of Health Psychology,2017,25(12):1889-1894
[5]Fu Peng,Ling Yu.The influence of life events and social resources on left-behind children life satiafaction[J].China Journal of Health Psychology,2017,25(6):853-858
[6]窦东梅,蒙衡.农村留守小学生生活质量的个人家庭影响因素分析[J].中国学校卫生,2008,10(29):921-922
[7]幸箐筠,钟晓妮,杨国婧.“留守”对重庆市儿童生活质量的影响[J].第二军医大学学报,2016,37(4):424-428
[8]高菲菲,高占良,邓梅洁.山东省和四川省留守儿童生活质量及影响因素分析[J].重庆医学,2015,44(16):2242-2244
[9]杨秀清.福清市中小学留守儿童生活质量调查分析[J].福建师大福清分校学报,2012,32(4):112-116
[10]沈林,杨俊敏,毕存箭.喀什农村少数民族留守儿童中小学生生活质量状况[J].中国学校卫生,2012,33(6):736-738
[11]邓冰,郭丽芳,王慧群.贵州山区10-14岁留守儿童生活质量状况分析[J].中国学校卫生,2011,32(5):610-611
[12]王莉,徐伟亚,王锋,等.农村留守儿童生活质量及与自尊和个性的关系[J].精神医学杂志,2011,24(3):186-188
[13]王鑫.留守儿童生命质量的研究进展[J].中国社会医学杂志,2010,27(2):90-92
[14]吴汉荣,刘普林,蒙衡.儿少生活质量量表信效度分析及全国常模的制定[J].中国学校卫生,2006,27(1):18-21
[15]李佳樾,何莉,郭金仙,等.甘肃农村留守儿童生活质量现状分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2014,22(12):1308-1310
[16]邓冰,郭丽芳,王慧群.贵州山区10-14岁留守儿童生活质量状况分析[J].中国学校卫生,2011,32(5):610-611
[17]张敏.淮北市农村初中留守儿童生活质量现状分析[J].中国学校卫生2008,29(1):12-14
[18]Yu Yongting,Zhang Fuchang.Study on the subjective well-being of“left-at-home children”and the affecting factors[J].China Journal of Health Psychology,2010,18(6):738-741
[19]陈静仪,方耀华,蒋轶.广州市儿童青少年生活质量现状调查[J].中国学校卫生,2009,30(7):647-648
[20]胡明月,李嫱,王文蔚.温州市儿童青少年生活质量状况及影响因素分析[J].卫生研究,2010,39(6):776-778
[21]Liang Ting,Zheng Lili,Qin Kai,et al.Subjective well-being of left-behind children in Guangzhou[J].China Journal of Health Psychology,2014,22(4):632-634
[22]Su S,Li X,Lin D,et al.Psychological adjustment among leftbehind children in rural China:The role of parental migration and parent-child communication[J].Child Care Health Dev,2013,39(2):162-170