2012~2018年临朐县不同健康教育模式对艾滋病知识知晓情况调查
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Survey on awarehess rate of AIDS-related knowledge improved by different health education modes,Linqu county,2012-2018
  • 作者:王群生 ; 丛湘庆 ; 刘金明 ; 韩鑫 ; 李文芬 ; 白晓燕 ; 谢文栋 ; 张桐亮
  • 英文作者:WANG Qun-sheng;CONG Xiang-qing;LIU Jin-ming;HAN Xin;LI Wen-fen;BAI Xiao-yan;XIE Wen-dong;ZHANG Tong-liang;Jiangyu Central Health Centre;
  • 关键词:大众宣传 ; 网络干预 ; 健康教育基地 ; 文艺形式 ; 健康教育模式
  • 英文关键词:Public propaganda;;Online intervention;;Health education base;;Art form;;Health education mode
  • 中文刊名:YXWX
  • 英文刊名:Preventive Medicine Tribune
  • 机构:临朐县蒋峪中心卫生院;临朐县疾病预防控制中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-10
  • 出版单位:预防医学论坛
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.25
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YXWX201905022
  • 页数:3
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:37-1428/R
  • 分类号:68-70
摘要
目的对大众宣传、网络干预、健康教育基地、文艺形式等4种健康教育模式提高人群艾滋病知识的程度进行对比性研究,为探索宣传教育工作模式提供科学依据。方法采用整群随机抽样追踪调查方法搜集资料,比较分析健康教育干预前后艾滋病知识提高程度。结果 4种模式干预前后的人口学特征构成差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。大众宣传模式干预后艾滋病知识知晓率提高了6.27%(P<0.01),网络干预模式干预后提高了6.94%(P>0.05),文艺宣传模式干预后提高了(P<0.01),健康教育基地模式干预后提高了37.86%(P<0.01)。干预后以"蚊虫叮咬会传播艾滋病病毒吗?"、"与艾滋病感染者或病人一起吃饭会感染艾滋病吗?"、"正确使用安全套会降低艾滋病传播的危险吗?"3道题提高最多,分别提高22.67%~46.77%、18.56%~56.63%、20.28%~42.88%。结论大众宣传、网络干预、健康教育基地、文艺形式4种模式均有效提高了艾滋病知识知晓率,以健康教育基地模式提高最为明显。
        Objective To comparative study the improvement of AIDS-related knowledge among the population by 4 health education modes including public propaganda,online intervention,health education base and art form,so as to provide scientific evidence for exploring the work mode of publicity and education. Methods Data was collected by cluster random sampling tracking survey method,the improvement of AIDS-related knowledge before and after the intervention of health education was compared and analyzed. Results There was no statistically significant difference in the demographic characteristics before and after the intervention by 4 modes(P>0.05).The awareness rate of AIDS-related knowledge increased by 6.27%,6.94%,9.65% and 37.86% respectively after intervention by public propaganda mode(P<0.01),online intervention mode(P<0.01),art form mode(P<0.01) and health education base mode(P<0.01).The awareness rate had the biggest increase in 3 questions "can mosquito bites spread HIV?", "can you get AIDS from eating with people who are infected or sick?" and "does the correct use of condoms reduce the risk of HIV transmission?",which increased from 22.67% to 46.77%,18.56% to 56.63% and 20.28% to 42.88% respectively. Conclusion 4 health education modes including public propaganda,online intervention,health education base and art form all increase the awareness rate of AIDS-related knowledge effectively,and the health education base mode has the best effect.
引文
[1] 成小弟,樊景春.中国儿童艾滋病的流行现状与面临挑战[J].预防医学论坛,2016,22(7):551-557.
    [2] 国务院防治艾滋病工作委员会办公室.中国艾滋病防治与督导评估框架(试行)[M].北京:人民出版社,2007.
    [3] 万绍平,刘明艳,徐保华,等.规模化实施农村居民艾滋病防治知识入户宣传的效果分析[J].中国艾滋病性病,2012,16(11):773-775.
    [4] 吴李梅,许亚平,严丽英,等.初中生艾滋病/性病健康教育近期效果评价[J].中国健康教育,2006,22(2):106-107.
    [5] 李晋芬,任学锋.中国健康教育与健康促进的挑战机遇与展望[J].中国预防医学杂志,2018,19(2):156-158.
    [6] 张桐亮,王春学,孙淑艳,等.临朐县部分育龄妇女健康教育状况调查[J].预防医学论坛,2015,21(9):706-707.
    [7] 张劲松,唐宇钧.大学生艾滋病健康教育模式效果评价研究[J].湖南人文科技学院学报,2007,99(6):68-70.
    [8] 屠晓梅,王佳佳.桐乡市人体健康科普基地活动实践与探索[J].中国健康教育,2015,31(8):812-813.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700