用户名: 密码: 验证码:
陆相断陷盆地页岩油资源潜力评价——以东营凹陷沙三段下亚段为例
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Evaluation of shale oil resource potential in continental rift basin:A case study of Lower Es_3 Member in Dongying Sag
  • 作者:朱日房 ; 张林晔 ; 李政 ; 王茹 ; 张守春 ; 张蕾
  • 英文作者:ZHU Rifang;ZHANG Linye;LI Zheng;WANG Ru;ZHANG Shouchun;ZHANG Lei;Exploration and Development Research Institute,Shengli Oilfield Company,SINOPEC;Shengli Oilfield Branch,State Energy Center for Shale Oil Research and Development;Key Laboratory of Shale Oil/Gas Exploration and Production,SINOPEC;State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics,Northwest University;
  • 关键词:陆相断陷盆地 ; 页岩油 ; 资源评价 ; 沙三段下亚段 ; 东营凹陷
  • 英文关键词:continental rift basin;;shale oil;;resource evaluation;;Lower Es3 Member;;Dongying Sag
  • 中文刊名:YQCS
  • 英文刊名:Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency
  • 机构:中国石化胜利油田分公司勘探开发研究院;国家能源局页岩油研发中心胜利油田分室;中国石化页岩油气勘探开发重点实验室;西北大学大陆动力学国家重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-03 11:23
  • 出版单位:油气地质与采收率
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.26;No.136
  • 基金:国家“973”计划“中国东部古近系陆相页岩油富集机理与分布规律”子课题“陆相页岩油资源潜力与分布规律”(2014CB239105);; 国家科技重大专项“济阳坳陷页岩油勘探开发目标评价”(2017ZX05049-004);; 国家自然科学基金项目“湖相页岩油可动性基本地质条件研究”(41372129);
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YQCS201901014
  • 页数:8
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:37-1359/TE
  • 分类号:133-140
摘要
页岩油资源潜力分析是页岩油勘探实践最重要的基础工作之一,可动资源量是最直接的资源潜力衡量指标。在借鉴页岩油资源评价和页岩油可动性等已有研究成果的基础上,分别应用氯仿沥青"A"参数法和热解参数法计算东营凹陷沙三段下亚段页岩油资源量和可动资源量。结果表明,2种方法的计算结果基本一致,页岩油资源量分别为11.39×10~8和11.57×10~8t。平面上,页岩油资源主要分布在各次级洼陷带,资源丰度为100×10~4~250×10~4t/km~2。纵向上,页岩油资源主要分布在埋深3 000~3 500 m,资源量为7.01×10~8t,其次分布在3 500~4 000 m,资源量为4.37×10~8t;从页岩油可动资源量来看,两者接近,分别为0.75×10~8和0.73×10~8t,但深部页岩油具有较高可动率。利津洼陷带具有较高的页岩油资源丰度和可动率,页岩油资源潜力大,为有利的页岩油勘探区。
        Shale oil resource potential analysis is one of the most important basic works in shale oil exploration practice. Recoverable oil resource is the most direct index of resource potential evaluation. Based on the existing research results of shale oil resources evaluation and the recovery of shale oil,the total resources and recoverable resources of the shale oil in Lower Es_3 Member in Dongying Sag were calculated by the chloroform asphalt"A"method and the pyrolysis parameter method respectively. The calculation results show that the calculation results obtained by the two methods are basically consistent,which are 1 139 million tons and 1 157 million tons respectively. The shale oil resources are mainly distributed horizontally in the central zone of the subsags,which the abundance of the resources is between1 million and 2.5 million t/km~2.Vertically,the shale oil resources are mainly occurred at the depth from 3 000 m to 3 500 m with 701 million tons shale oil resources,followed occurred at the depth from 3 500 to 4 000 m,which is 437 million tons shale oil resources. However,the amount of recoverable resources of shale oil are roughly equivalent at those two deep segments,which is 75 million tons and 73 million tons respectively. Shale oil located deeply has a higher recoverable rate. Lijin Subsag has high shale oil resource abundance and recovery mobility,high shale oil resource potential,and is a favorable area for shale oil exploration.
引文
[1]董冬,杨申镳,项希勇,等.济阳坳陷的泥质岩类油气藏[J].石油勘探与开发,1993,20(6):15-22.DONG Dong,YANG Shenbiao,XIANG Xiyong,et al.Muddy hydrocarbon reservoirs in Jiyang depression[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1993,20(6):15-22.
    [2]张善文,张林晔,李政,等.济阳坳陷古近系页岩油气形成条件[J].油气地质与采收率,2012,19(6):1-5.ZHANG Shanwen,ZHANG Linye,LI Zheng,et al.Formation conditions of Palaeogene shale oil and gas in Jiyang depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2012,19(6):1-5.
    [3]张林晔,李政,李钜源,等.东营凹陷古近系泥页岩中存在可供开采的油气资源[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(1):1-13.ZHANG Linye,LI Zheng,LI Juyuan,et al.Feasibility analysis of existing recoverable oil and gas resource in the Palaeogene shale of Dongying depression[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(1):1-13.
    [4]杨傲然,贾艳雨,谭静娟,等.南阳凹陷陆相页岩油形成条件及勘探潜力分析[J].石油地质与工程,2013,27(3):8-11.YANG Aoran,JIA Yanyu,TAN Jingjuan,et al.Research on continental shale oil forming conditions and exploration potential analysis in Nanyang depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2013,27(3):8-11.
    [5]孙焕泉.济阳坳陷页岩油勘探实践与认识[J].中国石油勘探,2017,22(4):1-14.SUN Huanquan.Exploration practice and cognitions of shale oil in Jiyang depression[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2017,22(4):1-14.
    [6]王勇,宋国奇,刘惠民,等.济阳坳陷页岩油富集主控因素[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(4):20-25.WANG Yong,SONG Guoqi,LIU Huimin,et al.Main control factors of enrichment characteristics of shale oil in Jiyang depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(4):20-25.
    [7]宁方兴.济阳坳陷不同类型页岩油差异性分析[J].油气地质与采收率,2014,21(6):6-9,14.NING Fangxing.Difference analysis on different types of shale oils in Jiyang depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2014,21(6):6-9,14.
    [8]朱日房,张林晔,李钜源,等.页岩滞留液态烃的定量评价[J].石油学报,2015,36(1):13-18.ZHU Rifang,ZHANG Linye,LI Juyuan,et al.Quantitative evaluation of residual liquid hydrocarbons in shale[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(1):13-18.
    [9]薛海涛,田善思,王伟明,等.页岩油资源评价关键参数--含油率的校正[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(1):15-22.XUE Haitao,TIAN Shansi,WANG Weiming,et al.Correction of oil content-one key parameter in shale oil resource assessment[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2016,37(1):15-22.
    [10]余涛,卢双舫,李俊乾,等.东营凹陷页岩油游离资源有利区预测[J].断块油气田,2018,25(1):16-21.YU Tao,LU Shuangfang,LI Junqian,et al.Prediction for favorable area of shale oil free resources in Dongying Sag[J].Fault-Block Oil&Gas Field,2018,25(1):16-21.
    [11]薛海涛,田善思,卢双舫,等.页岩油资源定量评价中关键参数的选取与校正--以松辽盆地北部青山口组为例[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2015,34(1):70-78.XUE Haitao,TIAN Shansi,LU Shuangfang,et al.Selection and verification of key parameters in the quantitative evaluation of shale oil:A case study at the Qingshankou Formation,Northern Songliao Basin[J].Bulletin of Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry,2015,34(1):70-78.
    [12]钱门辉,蒋启贵,黎茂稳,等.湖相页岩不同赋存状态的可溶有机质定量表征[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(2):278-286.QIAN Menhui,JIANG Qigui,LI Maowen,et al.Quantitative characterization of extractable organic matter in lacustrine shale with different occurrences[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2017,39(2):278-286.
    [13]蒋启贵,黎茂稳,钱门辉,等.不同赋存状态页岩油定量表征技术与应用研究[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(6):842-849.JIANG Qigui,LI Maowen,QIAN Menhui,et al.Quantitative characterization of shale oil in different occurrence states and its application[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2016,38(6):842-849.
    [14]李钜源.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系泥页岩孔隙特征及孔隙度演化规律[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(5):566-574.LI Juyuan.Pore characteristics and their evolution in Paleogene mud shales,Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2015,37(5):566-574.
    [15]LI T,JIANG Z,LI Z,et al.Continental shale pore structure characteristics and their controlling factors:A case study from the lower third member of the Shahejie Formation,Zhanhua Sag,Eastern China[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science&Engineering,2017,45:670-692.
    [16]LI T,JIANG Z,XU C,et al.Effect of pore structure on shale oil accumulation in the lower third member of the Shahejie formation,Zhanhua Sag,eastern China:Evidence from gas adsorption and nuclear magnetic resonance[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2017,88:932-949.
    [17]朱日房,张林晔,李钜源,等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷泥页岩有机储集空间研究[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(4):352-356.ZHU Rifang,ZHANG Linye,LI Juyuan,et al.Organic matter reservoir space of shale in Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2012,34(4):352-356.
    [18]黄睿哲,姜振学,高之业,等.页岩储层组构特征对自发渗吸的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2017,24(1):111-115.HUANG Ruizhe,JIANG Zhenxue,GAO Zhiye,et al.Effect of composition and structural characteristics on spontaneous imbibition of shale reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2017,24(1):111-115.
    [19]宋国奇,张林晔,卢双舫,等.页岩油资源评价技术方法及其应用[J].地学前缘,2013,20(4):221-228.SONG Guoqi,ZHANG Linye,LU Shuangfang,et al.Resource evaluation method for shale oil and its application[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(4):221-228.
    [20]卢双舫,陈国辉,王民,等.辽河坳陷大民屯凹陷沙河街组四段页岩油富集资源潜力评价[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(1):8-14.LU Shuangfang,CHEN Guohui,WANG Min,et al.Potential evaluation of enriched shale oil resource of Member4 of the Shahejie Formation in the Damintun Sag,Liaohe Depression[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2016,37(1):8-14.
    [21]陈小慧.页岩油赋存状态与资源量评价方法研究进展[J].科学技术与工程,2017,17(3):136-144.CHEN Xiaohui.Advances in the research on the occurrence state and resources assessment of shale oil[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2017,17(3):136-144.
    [22]刘庆.东营凹陷樊页1井沙河街组烃源岩元素地球化学特征及其地质意义[J].油气地质与采收率,2017,24(5):40-45,52.LIU Qing.Element geochemical characteristics of source rocks in the Shahejie Formation in Well Fangye-1,Dongying sag and their geological significance[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2017,24(5):40-45,52.
    [23]刘惠民,孙善勇,操应长,等.东营凹陷沙三段下亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征及其分布模式[J].油气地质与采收率,2017,24(1):1-10.LIU Huimin,SUN Shanyong,CAO Yingchang,et al.Lithofacies characteristics and distribution model of fine-grained sedimentary rock in the lower Es3member,Dongying sag[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2017,24(1):1-10.
    [24]颜永何,邹艳荣,屈振亚,等.东营凹陷沙四段烃源岩留-排烃量的实验研究[J].地球化学,2015,44(1):79-86.YAN Yonghe,ZOU Yanrong,QU Zhenya,et al.Experimental study on hydrocarbon retention-expulsion of Es4formation source rock in the Dongying Depression[J].Geochimica,2015,44(1):79-86.
    [25]LI Zheng,ZOU Yanrong,XU Xingyou,et al.Adsorption of mudstone source rock for shale oil-Experiments,model and a case study[J].Organic Geochemistry,2016,92:55-62.
    [26]ZOU Yanrong,SUN Jianan,LI Zheng,et al.Evaluating shale oil in the Dongying Depression,Bohai Bay Basin,China,using the oversaturation zone method[J].Journal of Petroleum Science&Engineering,2018,161:291-301.
    [27]张林晔,包友书,李钜源,等.湖相页岩中矿物和干酪根留油能力实验研究[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(6):776-780.ZHANG Linye,BAO Youshu,LI Juyuan,et al.Hydrocarbon and crude oil adsorption abilities of minerals and kerogens in lacustrine shales[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2015,37(6):776-780.
    [28]张林晔,李钜源,李政,等.陆相盆地页岩油气地质研究与实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2017:146-154.ZHANG Linye,LI Juyuan,LI Zheng,et al.Geological research and practice of shale oil and gas in continental basin[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2017:146-154.
    [29]PEPPER Andrew S,CORVI Peter J.Simple kinetic models of petroleum formation,PartⅢ:Modelling an open system[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,1995,12(4):417-452.
    [30]JARVIE D M.Shale resource systems for oil and gas:Part2-Shaleoil resource systems[J].AAPG Memoir 97,2012:89-119.
    [31]卢双舫,黄文彪,陈方文.页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):249-256.LU Shuangfang,HUANG Wenbiao,CHEN Fangwen.Classification and evaluation criteria of shale oil and gas resources:Discussion and application[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):249-256.
    [32]胡慧婷,卢双舫,刘超,等.测井资料计算源岩有机碳含量模型对比及分析[J].沉积学报,2011,29(6):1 199-1 205.HU Huiting,LU Shuangfang,LIU Chao,et al.Models for calculating organic carbon content from logging information:Comparison and analysis[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2011,29(6):1 199-1 205.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700