摘要
针对某厂2×660 MW超超临界机组项目可用煤源(包括煤泥、煤矸石和烟煤)情况,对机组锅炉选型问题进行了分析研究。从机组建设成本、运行成本、环保指标等方面,比较了高效煤粉(PC)锅炉和循环流化床(CFB)锅炉优缺点。分析研究表明,该厂采用CFB锅炉具有投资省,运行成本低等综合优势。
According to the coal resource(including slime,gangue,bituminous coal),type selections of 2×660 MW CFB boilers were discussed. The advantages and disadvantages of high efficiency pulverized coal(PC)and circulating fluidized bed(CFB)boiler were compared in terms of construction cost,operating cost and environmental protection. The analyses showed that the CFB boiler had the advantages of low investment,low running cost and good comprehensive advantages.
引文
[1]张敏,肖平,吕怀安,等.410/h锅炉传热系数试验研究[J].中国电机工程学报,2014,34(5):741-746.
[2]李斌,李建峰,吕俊复,等.我国大型循环流化床锅炉机组运行现状[J].锅炉技术,2012,43(1):22-27.
[3]程乐鸣,许霖杰,夏云飞,等.600 MW超临界循环流化床锅炉关键问题研究[J].中国电机工程学报,2015,35(21):5520-5532.
[4]胡昌华,卢啸风.600 MW超临界循环流化床锅炉设备与运行[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2012:166-168.
[5]杨建华,姜烈,樊真一.循环流化床锅炉设备与运行[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2006:3-5.
[6]孙献斌,黄中.大型循环流化床锅炉技术与工程应用[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2013:155-173.
[7]孙献斌,胡昌华,李星华,等.600 MW超临界循环流化床锅炉外置床壁温特性分析[J].电力建设,2014,35(4):6-9.
[8]吕俊复,张缦,杨海瑞,等.简约型660 MW超超临界循环流化床锅炉设计开发[J].中国电机工程学报,2014,34(5):741-746.
[9]聂立,王鹏,彭累,等.600 MW超临界循环流化床锅炉的设计[J].动力工程,2008,28(5):701-706.
[10]钱宇,张敏,李力全.600 MW循环流化床锅炉防磨技术[J].热力发电,2007(6):72-74.
[11]冯俊凯,沈幼庭,杨瑞昌.锅炉原理及计算[M].3版.北京,科学出版社,2003:247-261.
[12]孙献斌,时正海,金森旺.循环流化床锅炉超低排放技术研究[J].中国电力,2014,47(1):155-157.