摘要
为引进和推广饲用玉米(Zea mays)提供理论依据,利用单因素方差分析和主成分分析对5个品种(科多四号、科多八号、BMS001、BMS002和中原单32)饲用玉米的10个主要农艺性状进行分析和评价。结果表明:饲用玉米各品种间农艺性状差异均达到极显著水平(P<0.05)。主成分分析得到的前2个主成分特征值的累积贡献率达到了90.02%,分别表示生产性能和营养生长的特点。通过第1和第2主成分值为坐标作图,得出BMS001和BMS002的综合性能表现最好。
In order to provide theoretical basis for introduction and extension the Zea mays,ten agronomic traits from five forage maize varieties(Keduo 4,Keduo 8,BMS001,BMS002 and Zhongyuandan 32) were evaluated by one-way ANOVA and principal component.Results showed that agronomic traits were significantly different among all of the five forage maize varieties(P<0.01).The component contributin rate of two extracted principal component factors was 90.02% in principal component analysis.The first and second principal component were productive performance and vegetative growth respectively.Coordinate drawing by means of first and second principal component values,the comprehensive performance of BMS001 and BMS002 were the best.
引文
[1]王益军,邓德祥,卞云龙.多叶型玉米研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(16):129-133.
[2]李向拓,吴权明,毛建昌.饲用玉米育种要求性状特征及研究进展[J].西北农业学报,2003,12(2):36-40.
[3]田效琴,李卓,刘永红.川中丘陵区夏播青贮玉米品种特性试验[J].草地学报,2018,26(1):256-260.
[4]陈锡东,徐泽进.奶牛场中青贮玉米的调制与利用[J].中国乳业,2002,03:14-15.
[5]王霞,王振华,金益,等.种植密度对青贮玉米生物产量及部分农艺性状的影响[J].玉米科学,2005,13(2):94-96
[6]李德锋,姜义宝,付楠,等.青贮玉米品种比较试验[J].草地学报,2013,21(3):612-617.
[7]闫慧颖,李春喜,唐生华,等.青海旱地3个青贮玉米品种的生产性能及品质评价[J].草业科学,2017,34(9):1915-1921.
[8]武路广,霍梅俊,董宽虎.山西不同居群白羊草主要农艺性状评价[J].草地学报,2013,21(3):626-630.
[9]杨建华,李淑芳,范志远,等.美国山核桃主要经济性状的主成分分析及良种选择[J].浙江农林大学学报,2011,28(6):907-911.