长沙市2013—2016年HFMD重症病例肠道病毒谱及其基因特征
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:VP1 gene analysis of CAV 6 and CAV 10 infected severe hand, foot and mouth disease case in Changsha, 2013-2016
  • 作者:杨人贵 ; 孙边成 ; 欧新华 ; 黄政 ; 李灵之 ; 陈静芳
  • 英文作者:YANG Rengui;SUN Biancheng;OU Xinhua;HUANG Zheng;LI Lingzhi;CHEN Jingfang;Changsha Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
  • 关键词:重症手足口病 ; 柯萨奇病毒 ; 进化树分析 ; 柯萨奇病毒A组6型 ; 柯萨奇病毒A组10型
  • 英文关键词:severe hand foot and mouth disease;;Coxsackievirus;;phylogenetic;;CAV 6;;CAV 10
  • 中文刊名:RDYX
  • 英文刊名:China Tropical Medicine
  • 机构:长沙市疾病预防控制中心;
  • 出版日期:2018-02-18
  • 出版单位:中国热带医学
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.18
  • 基金:湖南省卫生计生委科研项目(No.B2016-166)1967
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:RDYX201802005
  • 页数:4
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:46-1064/R
  • 分类号:25-28
摘要
目的了解2013年至2016年长沙市手足口重症病例感染柯萨奇病毒A组6型(CAV 6)和柯萨奇病毒A组10型(CAV 10)肠道病毒的流行趋势,并对其VP1基因进化概况进行分析。方法运用描述性统计学分析方法对全市重症手足口病流行病学资料进行整理。CAV 6和CAV 10型肠道病毒阳性咽拭子、肛拭子或粪便标本用逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)扩增VP1基因片段,序列比对后用MEGA软件构建进化树。结果 2013—2016年全市共检测111份重症手足口病例标本,肠道病毒阳性标本80份,检出率为72.07%。80份肠道病毒阳性标本中,CAV 6型10株,CAV 10型8株。核苷酸序列的同源性分析发现,CAV 6型肠道病毒核苷酸序列之间存在0.8%~6.6%的差异。CAV 10型肠道病毒核苷酸序列之间存在1.1%~5.6%的变化差异。8株CAV 6型毒株均位于D2分支,1株处于D1分支。6株CAV 10型毒株位于E分支。结论 CAV 6和CAV 10肠道病毒在基因水平并未发生明显突变。重症病例中出现CAV 6型和CAV 10型感染高峰年份,但2016年有所降低,应将CAV 6和CAV 10型肠道病毒纳入常规监测,降低手足口发病风险。
        Objective To investigate the molecular characterization and epidemic trend of CAV 6 and CAV 10 subtypein hand, foot and mouth disease severe cases during 2013 and 2016. Methods Epidemiological data was treated withdescriptive statistics methods. Clinical specimens, such as anal and throat swab samples, were identified using real-time PCRafter RNA nucleic acid had been extracted. Then, the VP1 gene segment of CAV 6 and CAV 10 positive samples wereamplified, and sequencing. We used MEGA 6.0 to construct the phylogenetic trees. Results Severe HFMD cases positiveratio was 72.07%, which indicated that 80 cases in 111 samples of enterovirus detection. Then, RT-PCR experiment showedthat all the strains contained three subtypes, including 45 strains of EV 71, 10 strains of CAV 6 and 8 strains of CAV 10. Thehomologous analysis of nucleotide sequence found that there was a difference of 0.8%-6.6% between the nucleotide sequenceof CAV 6. There was a difference of between 1.1% and 5.6% of the nucleotide sequence of CAV 10. Phylogenetic analyzationproved that 8 strains of CAV 6 were belong to D2 branch, one CAV 6 strain belonged to D1 branch. However, 6 strains of CAV10 strains were belong to E branch. Conclusion The genotype of CAV 6 and CAV 10 in severe HFMD cases were tendingtowards stability in Changsha City among 2013 to 2016. The prevalence and genetic evolution of the CAV 6 and CAV 10 viruscould be closely monitored, to prevent a new human pandemics.
引文
[1]MURPHY F A.On target:“Virus Taxonomy.Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses-Sixth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses”will be published in March1995 by Springer-Verlag Wien New York[J].Archives of Virology,1995,140(2):391-392.
    [2]ANG LW,KOH BK,CHAN KP,et al.Epidemiology and control of hand,foot and mouth disease in Singapore,2001-2007[J].Ann Acad Med Singap,2009,38(2):106-112.
    [3]ABUBAKAR S,CHEE HY,SHAFEE N,et al.Molecular detection of enteroviruses from an outbreak of hand,foot and mouth disease in Malaysia in 1997[J].Scand J Infect Dis,1999,31(4):331-335.
    [4]ZHANG Y,TAN XJ,WANG HY,et al.An outbreak of hand,foot,and mouth disease associated with subgenotype C4 of human enterovirus 71 in Shandong,China[J].J Clin Virol,2009,44(4):262-267.
    [5]SHAHMAHMOODI S,MEHRABI Z,ESHRAGHIAN MR,et al.First detection of enterovirus 71 from an acute flaccid paralysis case with residual paralysis in Iran[J].J Clin Virol,2008,42(4):409-411.
    [6]曾汉日,陆靖,李晖,等.广东省2008-2013年柯萨奇A6型肠道病毒的流行及其基因特征分析[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,2014,34(10):742-746.
    [7]陈炜,翁育伟,何文祥,等.2011~2013年福建省手足口病相关病原柯萨奇病毒A组6型的分子流行病学研究[J].病毒学报,2014,30(6):624-629.
    [8]谢国良,崔大伟,郑书发,等.2013~2014年杭州地区手足口病柯萨奇病毒A6型和A10型VP1基因特征分析[J].临床检验杂志,2015,33(12):938-941.
    [9]袁芳,陈慧,马江涛,等.2013~2015年宁夏地区手足口病柯萨奇病毒A组6型基因特征分析[J].病毒学报,2016,32(6):702-706.
    [10]武晶,杨军勇,董晓根,等.2016年北京市丰台区两起柯萨奇病毒A组10型引起的幼儿园疱疹性咽峡炎暴发疫情调查[J].疾病监测,2017,32(2):168-170.
    [11]李静,张婷,邹文菁,等.2016年湖北省部分地区手足口病肠道病毒病原谱及柯萨奇病毒A6型和A10型基因特征分析[J].疾病监测,2017,32(6):462-466.
    [12]欧新华,黄政,孙边成,等.2013-2015年长沙市手足口病病原学监测结果分析[J].现代预防医学,2016,43(20):3803-3806.
    [13]ZHANG Y,WANG D,YAN D,et al.Molecular Evidence of Persistent Epidemic and Evolution of Subgenotype B1Coxsackievirus A16-Associated Hand,Foot,and Mouth Disease in China[J].Journal of Clinical Microbiology,2009,48(2):619-622.
    [14]ZHU J,LUO Z,WANG J,et al.Phylogenetic analysis of Enterovirus71 circulating in Beijing,China from 2007 to 2009[J].PLo S ONE,2013,8(2):e56318.
    [15]CHAN YF,WEE KL,CHIAM CW,et al.Comparative genetic analysis of VP4,VP1 and 3D gene regions of enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 circulating in Malaysia between 1997-2008[J].Trop Biomed,2012,29(3):451-466.
    [16]李洋,张相萍,翟明强,等.安阳地区2013年手足口病柯萨奇病毒A6 VP1基因特征研究[J].病毒学报,2016,32(3):324-330.
    [17]HAN JF,XU S,ZHANG Y,et al.Hand,foot,and mouth disease outbreak caused by coxsackievirus A6,China,2013[J].J Infect,2014,69(3):303-305.
    [18]LI JL,YUAN J,YANG F,et al.Epidemic characteristics of hand,foot,and mouth disease in southern China,2013:coxsackievirus A6has emerged as the predominant causative agent[J].J Infect,2014,69(3):299-303.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700