磁共振和CT在股骨头坏死患者中的诊断效果对比观察
|
摘要
目的:对比探讨磁共振和CT在股骨头坏死患者中的诊断效果。方法:选取本院在2016年1月—2017年12月间接收的100例股骨头坏死患者的临床资料作为本次研究样本,按照诊断方法的差别采用随机分配的方式将患者分为对照组与实验组(每组各50名),对照组采取CT检查方法,实验组采取磁共振检查方法,观察对比两组患者的诊断效果。结果:实验组患者阳性检出率和髋关节积液检出率明显优于对照组(P <0.05),差异具有统计学意义;同时,实验组患者股骨头分级也明显优于对照组(P <0.05),差异显著。结论:通过对比两种诊断方法可以看出,实施磁共振影像检查在股骨头坏死患者中的诊断效果更为显著,能够有效提高诊断率和准确性,并且能够有效排查早期股骨头坏死,对于股骨头坏死患者的早期防治有积极作用,故值得深入研究并在临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the diagnostic results of MRI and CT in patients with femoral head necrosis. Methods The clinical data of 100 patients with femoral head necrosis received by our hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 were selected as the samples of this study, according to the diagnostic method of difference with the method of randomized divided the patients into control group and experimental group(50) in each group, control group adopts the method of CT examination, the experimental group adopts the method of magnetic resonance imaging, contrast observation the diagnosis effect of two groups of patients. Results The positive detection rate and hip effusion detection rate of patients in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group(P < 0.05), and the difference was statistically significant. At the same time, the femoral head grading of the experimental group was also significantly superior to that of the control group(P < 0.05), with significant difference. Conclusion It can be seen by comparing the two methods of diagnosis, implementation of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of patients with femoral head necrosis effect is more pronounced, can effectively improve the diagnostic rate and accuracy, and can effectively screen early avascular necrosis of the femoral head necrosis in patients with early prevention and treatment has a positive effect, so it is worth further research and application in clinical.
Objective To compare the diagnostic results of MRI and CT in patients with femoral head necrosis. Methods The clinical data of 100 patients with femoral head necrosis received by our hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 were selected as the samples of this study, according to the diagnostic method of difference with the method of randomized divided the patients into control group and experimental group(50) in each group, control group adopts the method of CT examination, the experimental group adopts the method of magnetic resonance imaging, contrast observation the diagnosis effect of two groups of patients. Results The positive detection rate and hip effusion detection rate of patients in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group(P < 0.05), and the difference was statistically significant. At the same time, the femoral head grading of the experimental group was also significantly superior to that of the control group(P < 0.05), with significant difference. Conclusion It can be seen by comparing the two methods of diagnosis, implementation of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of patients with femoral head necrosis effect is more pronounced, can effectively improve the diagnostic rate and accuracy, and can effectively screen early avascular necrosis of the femoral head necrosis in patients with early prevention and treatment has a positive effect, so it is worth further research and application in clinical.
引文
[1]张丽.用CT检查和MRI检查诊断股骨头坏死准确性的对比[J].当代医药论丛,2014,12(17):45-46.
[2]苏仲生,王明,杨海成,等.CT与MRI对股骨头坏死患者的诊断学价值对比分析[J].中国保健营养,2016,26(7):300.
[3]郭鹏举.比较CT与MRI技术在股骨头坏死诊断中的应用价值[J].中国卫生产业,2014,5(32):162-163.
[4]熊建明.CT与MRI技术在股骨头坏死诊断中的比较分析[J].大家健康旬刊,2014,8(4):346-347.
[5]范辉,孙传顺,赵庆龄.多层螺旋CT与磁共振成像诊断缺血性股骨头坏死的价值分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2014,8(10):86-87.
[6]张光岩,易礼海,付志刚,等.股骨头坏死患者CT与MRI的临床诊断价值[J].医药前沿,2015,5(9):147-148.
[2]苏仲生,王明,杨海成,等.CT与MRI对股骨头坏死患者的诊断学价值对比分析[J].中国保健营养,2016,26(7):300.
[3]郭鹏举.比较CT与MRI技术在股骨头坏死诊断中的应用价值[J].中国卫生产业,2014,5(32):162-163.
[4]熊建明.CT与MRI技术在股骨头坏死诊断中的比较分析[J].大家健康旬刊,2014,8(4):346-347.
[5]范辉,孙传顺,赵庆龄.多层螺旋CT与磁共振成像诊断缺血性股骨头坏死的价值分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2014,8(10):86-87.
[6]张光岩,易礼海,付志刚,等.股骨头坏死患者CT与MRI的临床诊断价值[J].医药前沿,2015,5(9):147-148.