国际接口、资源体系与技术创新共演过程研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The co-evolution process of international interface,resource system and technology innovation strategy
  • 作者:徐雨森 ; 郑稣鹏 ; 李金茹
  • 英文作者:XU Yu-sen;ZHENG Su-peng;LI Jin-ru;Faculty of Management and Economics;
  • 关键词:后发企业 ; 国际接口 ; 资源体系 ; 技术创新战略 ; 序贯演化
  • 英文关键词:latecomer enterprise;;international interface;;resource system;;technology innovation strategy;;sequential evolution
  • 中文刊名:KXYJ
  • 英文刊名:Studies in Science of Science
  • 机构:大连理工大学管理与经济学部;
  • 出版日期:2018-11-15
  • 出版单位:科学学研究
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.36;No.235
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71272095);; 国家软科学重大项目(2014GXS2D015);; 中央高校基本科研业务费资助(DUT17RW229)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:KXYJ201811019
  • 页数:11
  • CN:11
  • ISSN:11-1805/G3
  • 分类号:174-184
摘要
选取海尔集团作为主案例、华为技术有限公司与TCL公司作为辅案例展开纵向案例研究,分析了国际接口、资源体系及技术创新战略在后发企业国际化三个阶段的演化进程,得到以下研究发现:一是归纳了国际接口、资源体系与技术创新战略在国际化三个阶段的渐次演化规律,即国际接口从"内向引入"为主要特征向"全球配置"为主要特征演变;资源体系从"产业配套资源主导"为主要特征向"行业声誉资源主导"为主要特征演变;技术创新战略从"外来技术本土化"研发、"外向技术学习"为主要特征向"全球化研发""全球战略性学习"为主要特征演变。二是依次分析了三者在各个阶段的静态适配以及动态协同演化关系,提出三者间"链式旋进"的共演模型。
        By selecting Haier Group as the main case,Huawei Technologies co.,LTD and TCL as the auxiliary cases,this research analyzes the co-evolution of international interface,resource system and technology innovation strategy during the three stages of internationalization.The results are as follows.Firstly,sequential evolutions and regulations of international interface,resource system and technology innovation strategy are concluded,including international interface evolving from"internal lead-in connections" to "global allocation connections",resource system evolving from"associated industries resources" to "industry reputation resources" and technology innovation strategy evolving from"technology localization","external learning" to "global R&D","strategic learning".Secondly,the static adaptation and dynamic co-evolution of these three aspects are analyzed,and the co-evolution model has been proposed.
引文
[1]Oviatt B M,McDougall P P.Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2005,29(5):537-554.
    [2]Child J,Suzana B,Rodrigues.The internationalization of Chinese firms:A case for theoretical extension[J].Management and Organization Review,2005,1(3):381-410.
    [3]Hagerdoorn J.Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering:Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences[J].Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(5):371-386.
    [4]Laursen K,Salter A.Open for innovation:The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms[J].Strategic Management Journal,2006,27(2):131-150.
    [5]Barney J B.Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J].Journal of Management,1991,17(1):99-120.
    [6]Johanson J,Vahlne J E.The internationalization process of the firm:A model of knowledge development and increasing market commitment[J].Journal of International Business Studies,1977,(8):23-32.
    [7]Welch L S,Luostarinen R K.Inward-outward connections in internationalization[J].Journal of International Marketing,1993,1(1):44-56.
    [8]Chen C J,Huang Y F,Lin B W.How firms innovate through R&D internationalization?An S-curve hypothesis[J].Research Policy,2012,41(9):1544-1554.
    [9]Hitt M A,Ahlstrom D,Dacin M T,et al.The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies:China vs.Russia[J].Organization Science,2004,15(2):173-185.
    [10]Albers S,Wohlgezogen F,Zajac E J.Strategic alliance structures:An organization design perspective[J].Journal of Management,2016,42(3):582-614.
    [11]Oxley J E,Sampson R C.The scope and governance of international R&D alliances[J].Strategic Management Journal,2004,25(8):723-749.
    [12]Tortoriello M,McEvily B,Krackhardt D.Being a catalyst of innovation:The role of knowledge diversity and network closure[J].Organization Science,2014,26(2):423-438.
    [13]耿紫珍,刘新梅,杨晨辉.战略导向、外部知识获取对组织创造力的影响[J].南开管理评论,2012,15(4):15-27.
    [14]Mathews J A.Dragon multinationals:New players in21st century globalization[J].Asia Pacific journal of management,2006,23(1):5-27.
    [15]徐雨森,徐娜娜,逯垚迪.“综合优势”后发企业快速国际化关键影响因素研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(6):128-136.
    [16]Li H,Yi X,Cui G.Emerging market firms'internationalization:How do firms'gains from inward activities affect their outward activities?[J].Strategic Management Journal,2017,38(13).
    [17]陈劲,景劲松.从ZT公司看中国企业的技术创新国际化之路[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002,(11):37-40.
    [18]Cantwell J A,Piscitello L.Accumulating technological competence:Its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalization[J].Industrial and Corporate Change,2000,9(1):21-51.
    [19]曾萍,邓腾智.企业国际化程度与技术创新的关系:一种学习的观点[J].国际贸易问题,2012,(10):59-67,85.
    [20]Bellamy M A,Ghosh S,Hora M.The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation[J].Journal of Operations Management,2014,32(6):357-373.
    [21]高太山,柳卸林.企业国际研发联盟是否有助于突破性创新?[J].科研管理,2016,37(1):48-57.
    [22]Beers C,Zand F.R&D cooperation,partner diversity,and innovation performance:An empirical analysis[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management,2014,31(2):292-312.
    [23]黄玮强,庄新田,姚爽.企业创新网络的自组织演化模型[J].科学学研究,2009,27(5):793-800.
    [24]刘锦英.核心企业自主创新网络演化机理研究---以鸽瑞公司“冷轧钢带”自主创新为例[J].管理评论,2014,26(2):157-164.
    [25]Newbert S L.Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm:An assessment and suggestions for future research[J].Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(2):121-146.
    [26]毛清华,湛敬贤,程卫霞.基于资源能力的风电企业技术创新战略动态选择---一个决策树逆向判断方法[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(18):74-79.
    [27]赵晓庆,许庆瑞.技术能力积累途径的螺旋运动过程研究[J].科研管理,2006,(1):40-46.
    [28]陈劲,景劲松,吴沧澜,等.我国企业技术创新国际化的模式及其动态演化[J].科学学研究,2003,(3):315-320.
    [29]吴先明,黄春桃.从内向国际化到外向国际化:后发企业技术追赶的可持续性[J].当代经济管理,2016,38,(2):11-18.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700