国外4个苜蓿品种营养价值的比较研究
|
摘要
本试验引进国外4个紫花苜蓿品种,以国产品种公农1号为对照,通过测定苜蓿初花期的干物质、粗蛋白、粗脂肪、粗灰分、无氮浸出物、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维等营养成分,对不同品种间的营养价值进行综合评价。研究表明:5个供试苜蓿品种间的营养物质含量存在差异,运用隶属函数分析法对5个供试品种的营养价值进行综合评价,结果表明龙威6010、Barricade(标靶)、Magnum CR、Magnum Salt的营养品质均要优于国内苜蓿品种公农1号,其中龙威6010是营养价值高的最优品种。
This test of four alfalfa varieties introduced from abroad,with domestic variety Gongnong NO.1 as the contrast,through the determination of alfalfa early flowering of dry matter,crude protein,crude fat,crude ash,nitrogen free extract,neutral detergent fiber,acid detergent fiber and other nutrients,to evaluate the nutritional value of different varieties.Researchshows:Five were differences between the nutrient content of alfalfa varieties,subordinate function analysis method is used to comprehensive evaluation of the nutritional value of five varieties tested,the results showed that Longwei 6010,Barricade,Magnum CR,Magnum Salt is superior to the nutritional quality of domestic alfalfa varieties and Gongnong NO.1,including Longwei 6010 is a high nutritional value of the optimal varieties.
This test of four alfalfa varieties introduced from abroad,with domestic variety Gongnong NO.1 as the contrast,through the determination of alfalfa early flowering of dry matter,crude protein,crude fat,crude ash,nitrogen free extract,neutral detergent fiber,acid detergent fiber and other nutrients,to evaluate the nutritional value of different varieties.Researchshows:Five were differences between the nutrient content of alfalfa varieties,subordinate function analysis method is used to comprehensive evaluation of the nutritional value of five varieties tested,the results showed that Longwei 6010,Barricade,Magnum CR,Magnum Salt is superior to the nutritional quality of domestic alfalfa varieties and Gongnong NO.1,including Longwei 6010 is a high nutritional value of the optimal varieties.
引文
[1]王建光.牧草饲料作物栽培学(第二版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2018.
[2]李富娟,王永雄等.苜蓿蛋白质及影响苜蓿粗蛋白含量的主要因素[J].四川草原,2006(2):6-9.
[3]侯敏.30个苜蓿材料生长特性与品质的比较及综合评价[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古大学硕士学位论文,2010.
[4]朱新强.不同生态区4个苜蓿品种营养品质及抗旱性评价[D].甘肃兰州:甘肃农业大学硕士学位论文,2011.
[5]Lamb J.F.,Sheaffer C.C.,Samac,D.A.Population Density And Harvest Maturity Effects On Leaf And Stem Quality In Alfalfa[J].Agronomy Journal,2003,(95):635-641.
[6]徐玉鹏,赵忠祥,王秀领,等.几个苜蓿品种的农艺性状及品质分析[J].河北农业科学,2007,11(2):9-11.
[7]胡守林,王汉全,赵书珍,等.12个紫花苜蓿品种营养价值分析[J].草业科学,2005,22(4):22-25.
[8]刘冠明,王晓明,吴壮丽.基于主成分分析的青贮玉米品种生产性能的综合评价[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2006,41(3):35-39.
[9]张晓兵,夏琛,项波卡,等.基于灰色关联分析的云南烟叶化学成分适宜性评价[J].烟草科技,2011,10(7):32-35.
[10]刘晶,田新会,杜文华*,等.基于隶属函数法和GGE双标图的饲草型小黑麦种质适应性评价[J].草业学报,2018,27(5):85-96.
[11]韩瑞宏,卢欣石*,杨秀娟,等.紫花苜蓿抗旱性主成分及隶属函数分析[J].草地学报,2006,14(2):142-146.
[12]庞丹波,李生宝,潘占兵*,等.基于主成分分析和隶属函数的紫花苜蓿引种初步评价[J].西南农业学报,2015,28(6):2815-2819.
[13]张志华.雁门关区不同品种紫花苜蓿产量和营养价值比较分析[D].山西太谷:山西农业大学硕士学位论文,2015.
[2]李富娟,王永雄等.苜蓿蛋白质及影响苜蓿粗蛋白含量的主要因素[J].四川草原,2006(2):6-9.
[3]侯敏.30个苜蓿材料生长特性与品质的比较及综合评价[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古大学硕士学位论文,2010.
[4]朱新强.不同生态区4个苜蓿品种营养品质及抗旱性评价[D].甘肃兰州:甘肃农业大学硕士学位论文,2011.
[5]Lamb J.F.,Sheaffer C.C.,Samac,D.A.Population Density And Harvest Maturity Effects On Leaf And Stem Quality In Alfalfa[J].Agronomy Journal,2003,(95):635-641.
[6]徐玉鹏,赵忠祥,王秀领,等.几个苜蓿品种的农艺性状及品质分析[J].河北农业科学,2007,11(2):9-11.
[7]胡守林,王汉全,赵书珍,等.12个紫花苜蓿品种营养价值分析[J].草业科学,2005,22(4):22-25.
[8]刘冠明,王晓明,吴壮丽.基于主成分分析的青贮玉米品种生产性能的综合评价[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2006,41(3):35-39.
[9]张晓兵,夏琛,项波卡,等.基于灰色关联分析的云南烟叶化学成分适宜性评价[J].烟草科技,2011,10(7):32-35.
[10]刘晶,田新会,杜文华*,等.基于隶属函数法和GGE双标图的饲草型小黑麦种质适应性评价[J].草业学报,2018,27(5):85-96.
[11]韩瑞宏,卢欣石*,杨秀娟,等.紫花苜蓿抗旱性主成分及隶属函数分析[J].草地学报,2006,14(2):142-146.
[12]庞丹波,李生宝,潘占兵*,等.基于主成分分析和隶属函数的紫花苜蓿引种初步评价[J].西南农业学报,2015,28(6):2815-2819.
[13]张志华.雁门关区不同品种紫花苜蓿产量和营养价值比较分析[D].山西太谷:山西农业大学硕士学位论文,2015.