“一带一路”国家经济社会发展水平测度与评价研究——基于丝路沿线64国指标数据的分析
|
摘要
"一带一路"建设是一项宏大而又复杂的系统工程,若要实现"突出重点、远近结合,有力有序有效"地建设推进,对丝路国家经济社会发展水平的基础性研究十分必要。据此,以可持续发展理论"均衡、开放、包容、共同发展"的新理念为理论依据,在对国际组织典型经济社会发展评价指标体系的理论支撑、组织宗旨进行梳理分析的基础上,构建了"一带一路"国家经济社会发展评价指标体系,从可持续发展、竞争力和开放度三个方面对沿线64国经济社会发展水平进行了测度和评价,旨在得出沿线国家经济社会发展状况的重要特征,为沿线各国做好政策沟通、战略对接以及企业部门更好地选择投资国与投资方向提供决策参考。
The construction of"The belt and road"is an immense and complicated Systematic Project.It is important to know the economic and social development level of related countries under the guidance of"Emphasizing the key points,integrating distal and proximal region,and Executing,Ordering &Efficiency".This paper is adopted the new philosophy of "Balance,Open,Inclusion and Common development",analyses the theoretical foundation and organizational objective of the typical countries of economic and social development evaluation system,and finally,establishes "The belt and road"state economic and social development evaluation system with 3 aspects as sustainability,competitiveness and opening degree.Through the measure and evaluation of 64 countries' economic and social development,this paper concluded the main characteristics of related countries' economic and social development.And it could be a reference for governments to take their communication policy and for enterprises to choose investment country and investment direction.
The construction of"The belt and road"is an immense and complicated Systematic Project.It is important to know the economic and social development level of related countries under the guidance of"Emphasizing the key points,integrating distal and proximal region,and Executing,Ordering &Efficiency".This paper is adopted the new philosophy of "Balance,Open,Inclusion and Common development",analyses the theoretical foundation and organizational objective of the typical countries of economic and social development evaluation system,and finally,establishes "The belt and road"state economic and social development evaluation system with 3 aspects as sustainability,competitiveness and opening degree.Through the measure and evaluation of 64 countries' economic and social development,this paper concluded the main characteristics of related countries' economic and social development.And it could be a reference for governments to take their communication policy and for enterprises to choose investment country and investment direction.
引文
[1]侯利民.“一带一路”倡议的地缘政治经济学分析[J].西安财经学院学报,2017(3).
[2]吴易风.经济增长理论的历史辨析[J].学术月刊,2003(2).
[3]President’s Research Committee on Social Trends.Recent Social Trends in the United States:Report of the President’s Research Committee on Social Trends[M].New York.New York:McGraw-Hill Book Co.,Inc.,1934.
[4]查尔斯·P·金德尔伯格(美).经济发展[M].张欣,等.译.上海:上海译文出版社,1986.
[5]席恒.孔德其人及对社会学的理论贡献[J].西北大学学报,2001,31(4).
[6]M Queisser,M Ladaique,MM D’Ercole.OECD List of Social Indicators[R].Springer Netherlands,2014.
[7]Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.OECD Factbook 2005-Economic Environmental and Social Statistics[M].OECD Publishing,2005.
[8]周长城,谢颖.经济社会发展综合评价指标体系研究[J].社会科学研究,2008(1).
[9]贺春临,周长城.福利概念与生活质量指标—欧洲生活质量指标体系的概念框架和结构研究[J].国外社会科学,2002(1).
[10]陈迎.可持续发展指标体系与国际比较研究[J].世界经济,1997(6).
[11]崔维军.欧盟创新指数研究进展[J].中国科技论坛,2009(11).
[12]胡健,王命宇.张淮群,等.经济社会发展测度指标体系以理论演变[J].统计与信息论坛,2016(8).
[13]谢洪礼.关于可持续发展指标体系的述评[J].统计研究,1998(6).
[14]李龙熙.对可持续发展理论的诠释与解析[J].行政与法:行政与法,2005(1).
[15]朱瑞庭.中国零售业“走出去”如何对接“一带一路”?——对五通的经济学分析[J].商业研究,2017(4).
(1)本评价数据来自于各组织2015年数据库的统计数据,中国各指标数据仅包括中国大陆地区。
(1)本研究涉及的“一带一路”64国与《愿景与行为》设计的“一带一路”64国有所区别,包括了希腊、塞浦路斯,去掉了东帝汶、叙利亚、巴勒斯坦,分布在六大地区。
[2]吴易风.经济增长理论的历史辨析[J].学术月刊,2003(2).
[3]President’s Research Committee on Social Trends.Recent Social Trends in the United States:Report of the President’s Research Committee on Social Trends[M].New York.New York:McGraw-Hill Book Co.,Inc.,1934.
[4]查尔斯·P·金德尔伯格(美).经济发展[M].张欣,等.译.上海:上海译文出版社,1986.
[5]席恒.孔德其人及对社会学的理论贡献[J].西北大学学报,2001,31(4).
[6]M Queisser,M Ladaique,MM D’Ercole.OECD List of Social Indicators[R].Springer Netherlands,2014.
[7]Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.OECD Factbook 2005-Economic Environmental and Social Statistics[M].OECD Publishing,2005.
[8]周长城,谢颖.经济社会发展综合评价指标体系研究[J].社会科学研究,2008(1).
[9]贺春临,周长城.福利概念与生活质量指标—欧洲生活质量指标体系的概念框架和结构研究[J].国外社会科学,2002(1).
[10]陈迎.可持续发展指标体系与国际比较研究[J].世界经济,1997(6).
[11]崔维军.欧盟创新指数研究进展[J].中国科技论坛,2009(11).
[12]胡健,王命宇.张淮群,等.经济社会发展测度指标体系以理论演变[J].统计与信息论坛,2016(8).
[13]谢洪礼.关于可持续发展指标体系的述评[J].统计研究,1998(6).
[14]李龙熙.对可持续发展理论的诠释与解析[J].行政与法:行政与法,2005(1).
[15]朱瑞庭.中国零售业“走出去”如何对接“一带一路”?——对五通的经济学分析[J].商业研究,2017(4).
(1)本评价数据来自于各组织2015年数据库的统计数据,中国各指标数据仅包括中国大陆地区。
(1)本研究涉及的“一带一路”64国与《愿景与行为》设计的“一带一路”64国有所区别,包括了希腊、塞浦路斯,去掉了东帝汶、叙利亚、巴勒斯坦,分布在六大地区。