美国社区公民法治教育研究
|
摘要
美国的公民法治教育因其卓有成效而备受关注,但目前国内关于如何在社区这一社会基本单位实施公民法治教育的研究并未全面展开。通过全面梳理、分析美国社区公民法治教育的经验,能够为我国社区开展公民法治教育提供有益借鉴。本文基于已有资料深入剖析了美国社区公民法治教育的历史沿革、支持体系与实践方式,结果显示:美国社区公民法治教育经历了从空白到再发展的过程,移民大量增加与国民认同成其触发点;追溯历史,韦伯、杜威等大家的哲学理论成其支持,而当今又有法律、政策、人员等方面的支持;上至州治理结构,下至实践从形式到内容都有其独特之处,如法学院的社区法律诊所。最后,基于法学和教育学角度的解读,对我国开展社区法治教育提出建议,希望能对我国社区教育模式持续健康发展提供有益参考。
American citizenship law education is the experience learning objects of China for its successful effect. There are not many research papers on how it works in community. To provide useful references, this paper analyzes the history, practices, support system of American citizenship law education in community, and concludes that American citizenship law education in community developed from vacancy, triggered by increasing immigration and national identity. It was supported by the philosophical theory of Max Weber and John Dewey at the beginning. It has the supporting of law, policy, personnel at present. It is unique from state governance structure to contents and forms of practice(Community Law Clinic of law school is an example). Based on the interpretation of law and education, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the development of community legal education and community education in China, hoping to provide useful references for the sustainable and healthy development of community education model in China.
American citizenship law education is the experience learning objects of China for its successful effect. There are not many research papers on how it works in community. To provide useful references, this paper analyzes the history, practices, support system of American citizenship law education in community, and concludes that American citizenship law education in community developed from vacancy, triggered by increasing immigration and national identity. It was supported by the philosophical theory of Max Weber and John Dewey at the beginning. It has the supporting of law, policy, personnel at present. It is unique from state governance structure to contents and forms of practice(Community Law Clinic of law school is an example). Based on the interpretation of law and education, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the development of community legal education and community education in China, hoping to provide useful references for the sustainable and healthy development of community education model in China.
引文
[1]陈晨(2010).学校与社区:美国服务学习对我国中小学公民教育的启示[J].现代教育论丛,(9):36-37.
[2]杜海坤,孙来麟,黄少成(2014).美国“主动”公民教育理念和实践及启示研究[J].湖北社会科学,(6):178.
[3]封丽霞(2016).辛普森“杀妻”案判决的启示[J].理论视野,(3):42.
[4]桂敏(2018).终身学习视角下大学社会服务:社区参与的国际经验[J].开放学习研究,(4):57-59.
[5]黄琴(2007).社区教育发展中政府职能及其实现方式研究[D].上海:上海交通大学.
[6]教育部社会科学研究与思想政治工作司(2001).比较思想政治教育学[M].北京:高等教育出版社:217.
[7]李先军,张晓琪(2015).美国中小学法治教育的历史演进、特点及启示[J].外国中小学教育,(5):17.
[8]罗贵明(2014).美国中小学公民教育评价实践探究[J].现代中小学教育,(1):124.
[9]阮一帆,孙文沛(2016).美国公民教育的历史变迁与启示(1776-1976)[J].武汉大学学报,(1):53.
[10]史蒂芬·R·奥顿(2002).从马伯里诉麦迪逊案到布什诉戈尔案看美国司法审查制度的两百年[J].法学评论,(3):125.
[11]史枫,徐新容(2018).北京建设可持续发展学习型城市:行动、模式与展望[J].开放学习研究,(3):43-49+55.
[12]舒晓莉(2017).服务学习模式探究—美国社区学院保障学生发展的举措及启示[J].安徽文学,(10):143.
[13]王慧(2015).权责一致基础上的国家认同教育—来自美国公民教育的启示[J].当代教育科学,(10):4.
[14]王康(2006).中国社区法律诊所的构建[D].北京:首都师范大学.
[15]杨燕燕(2001).社区教育模式及其本质[J].杭州师范学院学报(人文社会科学版),(4):115.
[16]于海静(2004).美国公民教育的历史沿革、现状与发展趋势[J].外国教育研究,(3):10-12.
[17]于学涛,李征(2003).中美社区学院的比较与思考[J].陕西师范大学继续教育学报,(9):22-23.
[18]袁翔珠(2016).论美国法律诊所教育的特点及其启示[J].大学教育,(2):155.
[19]张斌闲,高玲(2015).艰难历程:《史密斯—休斯法》的创制[J].华中师范大学学报(社会科学版),(3):158-159.
[20]Educational Political Commission(1938).The Purposes of Education in American Democracy[M]. Educational Policies Commission,NationalEducationAssociationoftheUnited States, and the American Association of School Administrators.
[21]Kirby, E. H.(2006). Federal Policies on Civic Education and Service[R].The Center for Information&Research on Civic Learning&Engagement:87.
[22]Leming,R.S.(1996).EssentialsofLaw-Related Education.ERIC Digest(ED390779)[EB/OL].(1996-03).[2017-10-15].http://www.ericdigests.org/1996-3/law.htm.
[23] Mandelbaum,L.(2010).“AGING OUT:DON’T MISS OUT”-A MODEL OFCOMMUNITY LEGAL EDUCATION[J].FAMILY COURT REVIEW, 48(2):338-361.
[24]Mar x-Singer,L.C.(1985).POLITICA LA DU LT E DUCAT ION:AST U DYOFC OM M U N I T YL E GA L EDUCATION IN ONE MAJOR CITY[EB/OL].(1985-10).[2017-9-27].https://fordham.bepress.com/dissertations/AAI8508122.
[25]Naylor,D.T.(1977).ACommunityBasedApproach to Law-Related Education:The Cincinnati Model Peabody[J].Journal of Education, 55(1):24-27.
[26]Pereira, C.(1988). Law-related Education in Elementary and Secondary School[EB/OL].(1988-6).[2017-10-15].https://fi les.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED296948.pdf.
[2]杜海坤,孙来麟,黄少成(2014).美国“主动”公民教育理念和实践及启示研究[J].湖北社会科学,(6):178.
[3]封丽霞(2016).辛普森“杀妻”案判决的启示[J].理论视野,(3):42.
[4]桂敏(2018).终身学习视角下大学社会服务:社区参与的国际经验[J].开放学习研究,(4):57-59.
[5]黄琴(2007).社区教育发展中政府职能及其实现方式研究[D].上海:上海交通大学.
[6]教育部社会科学研究与思想政治工作司(2001).比较思想政治教育学[M].北京:高等教育出版社:217.
[7]李先军,张晓琪(2015).美国中小学法治教育的历史演进、特点及启示[J].外国中小学教育,(5):17.
[8]罗贵明(2014).美国中小学公民教育评价实践探究[J].现代中小学教育,(1):124.
[9]阮一帆,孙文沛(2016).美国公民教育的历史变迁与启示(1776-1976)[J].武汉大学学报,(1):53.
[10]史蒂芬·R·奥顿(2002).从马伯里诉麦迪逊案到布什诉戈尔案看美国司法审查制度的两百年[J].法学评论,(3):125.
[11]史枫,徐新容(2018).北京建设可持续发展学习型城市:行动、模式与展望[J].开放学习研究,(3):43-49+55.
[12]舒晓莉(2017).服务学习模式探究—美国社区学院保障学生发展的举措及启示[J].安徽文学,(10):143.
[13]王慧(2015).权责一致基础上的国家认同教育—来自美国公民教育的启示[J].当代教育科学,(10):4.
[14]王康(2006).中国社区法律诊所的构建[D].北京:首都师范大学.
[15]杨燕燕(2001).社区教育模式及其本质[J].杭州师范学院学报(人文社会科学版),(4):115.
[16]于海静(2004).美国公民教育的历史沿革、现状与发展趋势[J].外国教育研究,(3):10-12.
[17]于学涛,李征(2003).中美社区学院的比较与思考[J].陕西师范大学继续教育学报,(9):22-23.
[18]袁翔珠(2016).论美国法律诊所教育的特点及其启示[J].大学教育,(2):155.
[19]张斌闲,高玲(2015).艰难历程:《史密斯—休斯法》的创制[J].华中师范大学学报(社会科学版),(3):158-159.
[20]Educational Political Commission(1938).The Purposes of Education in American Democracy[M]. Educational Policies Commission,NationalEducationAssociationoftheUnited States, and the American Association of School Administrators.
[21]Kirby, E. H.(2006). Federal Policies on Civic Education and Service[R].The Center for Information&Research on Civic Learning&Engagement:87.
[22]Leming,R.S.(1996).EssentialsofLaw-Related Education.ERIC Digest(ED390779)[EB/OL].(1996-03).[2017-10-15].http://www.ericdigests.org/1996-3/law.htm.
[23] Mandelbaum,L.(2010).“AGING OUT:DON’T MISS OUT”-A MODEL OFCOMMUNITY LEGAL EDUCATION[J].FAMILY COURT REVIEW, 48(2):338-361.
[24]Mar x-Singer,L.C.(1985).POLITICA LA DU LT E DUCAT ION:AST U DYOFC OM M U N I T YL E GA L EDUCATION IN ONE MAJOR CITY[EB/OL].(1985-10).[2017-9-27].https://fordham.bepress.com/dissertations/AAI8508122.
[25]Naylor,D.T.(1977).ACommunityBasedApproach to Law-Related Education:The Cincinnati Model Peabody[J].Journal of Education, 55(1):24-27.
[26]Pereira, C.(1988). Law-related Education in Elementary and Secondary School[EB/OL].(1988-6).[2017-10-15].https://fi les.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED296948.pdf.