交互方式对航天员虚拟训练效率和体验影响研究
|
摘要
目的研究不同交互方式对航天员虚拟训练效率和体验的影响,制定更好的航天员虚拟训练交互方案。方法针对选择/操纵类虚拟交互任务,设计用户实验,对比研究航天员虚拟训练过程中动作捕捉手套和交互手柄两种交互方式的差异。通过比较任务完成时间,客观比较两种交互方式的交互效率,同时通过主观量表比较两种交互方式的用户体验。结果两种交互方式在不同类型任务中交互效率不同;动作捕捉手套用户体验评分更高,但交互手柄也能带来出色的体验。结论在航天员虚拟训练系统开发过程中,应该优先根据任务类型选择交互方式,以更高的交互效率保证航天员虚拟训练效率。
Objective To study the effects of different interactive modes on the efficiency and experience of astronaut virtual training and thus develop a preferred human-computer interaction solution for astronaut virtual training system. Methods A user experiment was developed for selecting/manipulating virtual tasks,and the interaction efficiency of motion-capture gloves and handle controllers in astronaut virtual training was compared by the task completion time. At the same time,user experience of the two interactive modes was compared through subjective scale. Results There were significant differences in the efficiency of the two equipment while dealing with tasks of different types. Although the user score of the motion capture gloves was higher,the handle controller could also bring excellent experience. Conclusion While developing the astronaut virtual training system,the interactive mode should be selected according to the task type,and the virtual training efficiency of the astronauts should be ensured with higher interaction efficiency.
Objective To study the effects of different interactive modes on the efficiency and experience of astronaut virtual training and thus develop a preferred human-computer interaction solution for astronaut virtual training system. Methods A user experiment was developed for selecting/manipulating virtual tasks,and the interaction efficiency of motion-capture gloves and handle controllers in astronaut virtual training was compared by the task completion time. At the same time,user experience of the two interactive modes was compared through subjective scale. Results There were significant differences in the efficiency of the two equipment while dealing with tasks of different types. Although the user score of the motion capture gloves was higher,the handle controller could also bring excellent experience. Conclusion While developing the astronaut virtual training system,the interactive mode should be selected according to the task type,and the virtual training efficiency of the astronauts should be ensured with higher interaction efficiency.
引文
[1]姜国华,刘玉庆,朱秀庆,等.虚拟现实技术在空间站舱内定向训练中的应用[J].载人航天,2015,21(2):115-120.Jiang GH,Liu YQ,Zhu XQ,et al. Application of virtual reality in spatial orientation training for space station[J]. Manned Spaceflight,2015,21(2):115-120.
[2]刘鹏,姜国华,刘玉庆等.航天员虚拟训练系统可用性实验研究[J].航天医学与医学工程,2018,31(3):311-318.Liu P,Jiang GH,Liu YQ,et al. Experimental study on usability of astronaut virtual training system[J]. Space Medicine&Medical Engineering,2018,31(3):311-318.
[3]张凤军,戴国忠,彭晓兰.虚拟现实的人机交互综述[J].中国科学:信息科学,2016,46(12):1711-1736.Zhang FJ,Dai GZ,Peng XL. A survey on human-computer interaction in virtual reality[J]. SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis,2016,46(12):1711-1736.
[4] Mine M. Virtual environment interaction techniques[R]. UNC Chapel Hill CS Dept Technical Report TR95-018. 1995.
[5] Liang J,Green M. JDCAD:A highly interactive 3D modeling system[C]//International Conference on Cad and Computer Graphics,Beijing,China,Aug. 1994:499-506.
[6] Zhang Z. Microsoft kinect sensor and its effect[J]. IEEE Multimedia,2012,19(2):4-10.
[7] Bowman DA,Kruijff E,Laviola JJ,et al. 3D User Interfaces:Theory and Practice[M]. Boston:Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc. 2004.
[8] Witmer BG,Jerome CJ,Singer MJ. The factor structure of the presence questionnaire[J]. Presence,2005,14(3):298-312.
[9] Lewis JR. Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction,2002,14(3-4):463-488.
[2]刘鹏,姜国华,刘玉庆等.航天员虚拟训练系统可用性实验研究[J].航天医学与医学工程,2018,31(3):311-318.Liu P,Jiang GH,Liu YQ,et al. Experimental study on usability of astronaut virtual training system[J]. Space Medicine&Medical Engineering,2018,31(3):311-318.
[3]张凤军,戴国忠,彭晓兰.虚拟现实的人机交互综述[J].中国科学:信息科学,2016,46(12):1711-1736.Zhang FJ,Dai GZ,Peng XL. A survey on human-computer interaction in virtual reality[J]. SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis,2016,46(12):1711-1736.
[4] Mine M. Virtual environment interaction techniques[R]. UNC Chapel Hill CS Dept Technical Report TR95-018. 1995.
[5] Liang J,Green M. JDCAD:A highly interactive 3D modeling system[C]//International Conference on Cad and Computer Graphics,Beijing,China,Aug. 1994:499-506.
[6] Zhang Z. Microsoft kinect sensor and its effect[J]. IEEE Multimedia,2012,19(2):4-10.
[7] Bowman DA,Kruijff E,Laviola JJ,et al. 3D User Interfaces:Theory and Practice[M]. Boston:Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc. 2004.
[8] Witmer BG,Jerome CJ,Singer MJ. The factor structure of the presence questionnaire[J]. Presence,2005,14(3):298-312.
[9] Lewis JR. Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction,2002,14(3-4):463-488.