循证护理对急性心肌梗死后心律失常的效果
|
摘要
目的研究循证护理对于急性心肌梗死后心律失常患者的作用与效果。方法选取我院在2016年2月—2018年11月采用常规护理的45例急性心肌梗死后心律失常患者,将其作为A组,另选出我院在2016年2月—2018年11月在此基础之上采用循证护理的45例急性心肌梗死后心律失常患者,将其作为B组,观察比较其结果。结果 B组患者在护理后其住院时间、心功能分级、卧床时间、住院花费等指标均优于A组患者,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论在运用循证护理后,对于急性心肌梗死后心律失常患者而言,其护理的效果与质量都十分良好,且其可以构建十分融洽的护患关系,改善心功能分级。
Objective To study the effect of evidence-based nursing on arrhythmia patients after acute myocardial infarction. Methods 45 patients with arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction received routine nursing in our hospital from February 2016 to November 2018 were selected as group A. In addition, 45 patients with arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction who received evidence-based nursing in our hospital from February 2016 to November 2018 were selected as group B. The results were observed and compared. Results After nursing, the indexes of hospitalization time, cardiac function classification, bed-rest time and hospitalization cost in group B were better than those in group A, with statistical significance(P < 0.05). Conclusion After the application of evidence-based nursing, for patients with arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction, its nursing effect and quality are very good, and it can build a very harmonious nurse-patient relationship, improve the classification of cardiac function.
Objective To study the effect of evidence-based nursing on arrhythmia patients after acute myocardial infarction. Methods 45 patients with arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction received routine nursing in our hospital from February 2016 to November 2018 were selected as group A. In addition, 45 patients with arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction who received evidence-based nursing in our hospital from February 2016 to November 2018 were selected as group B. The results were observed and compared. Results After nursing, the indexes of hospitalization time, cardiac function classification, bed-rest time and hospitalization cost in group B were better than those in group A, with statistical significance(P < 0.05). Conclusion After the application of evidence-based nursing, for patients with arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction, its nursing effect and quality are very good, and it can build a very harmonious nurse-patient relationship, improve the classification of cardiac function.
引文
[1]祖丽丽,袁杭.急性心肌梗死并发左心衰竭使用无创呼吸机的护理[J].中国继续医学教育,2018,10(32):148-150.
[2]刘春红,曹霞.优化护理在急性心肌梗死患者急救中的效果分析[J].中国卫生标准管理,2018,9(16):159-161.
[3]罗美.院前急救护理干预对急性心肌梗死患者的应用效果分析[J].中国继续医学教育,2018,10(22):161-163.
[4]李慧琴.心理护理干预在ICU急性心肌梗死患者治疗中的应用效果评价[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(12):219-220.
[5]李玲,周丽娜,李姗姗.浅谈急性心肌梗死急诊介入治疗中心律失常的有效护理措施[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(8):210-211.
[6]董欢欢,张玮玮.延续护理对急性心肌梗死患者自我护理能力及生活质量的影响[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(21):151-153.
[7]陈伟.美托洛尔治疗慢性心力衰竭32例效果及对患者心功能分级与心室重塑指标影响观察[J].世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2019,19(2):107-108.
[8]张继慧.心理护理对老年冠心病并发心律失常患者焦虑、抑郁情绪的影响[J].中国继续医学教育,2016,8(12):247-248.
[9]王岩峰. ST段抬高型心肌梗死急诊介入术治疗的临床护理配合方法研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(30):196-197.
[10]艾威,李翠琼,王永红.主动脉球囊反搏术辅助治疗急性心肌梗死并泵衰竭的护理进展研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2016,7(15):192-193.
[11]吴松鸽,刘晓静,韩露.急性心肌梗死患者行静脉溶栓与常规治疗的效果比较及护理[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(12):258-259.
[12]连美升,朱婉婷,陈建芳.优化急诊护理路径对急性心肌梗死患者静脉抢救效果及预后的影响[J].中国卫生标准管理,2017,8(27):182-184.
[2]刘春红,曹霞.优化护理在急性心肌梗死患者急救中的效果分析[J].中国卫生标准管理,2018,9(16):159-161.
[3]罗美.院前急救护理干预对急性心肌梗死患者的应用效果分析[J].中国继续医学教育,2018,10(22):161-163.
[4]李慧琴.心理护理干预在ICU急性心肌梗死患者治疗中的应用效果评价[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(12):219-220.
[5]李玲,周丽娜,李姗姗.浅谈急性心肌梗死急诊介入治疗中心律失常的有效护理措施[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(8):210-211.
[6]董欢欢,张玮玮.延续护理对急性心肌梗死患者自我护理能力及生活质量的影响[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(21):151-153.
[7]陈伟.美托洛尔治疗慢性心力衰竭32例效果及对患者心功能分级与心室重塑指标影响观察[J].世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2019,19(2):107-108.
[8]张继慧.心理护理对老年冠心病并发心律失常患者焦虑、抑郁情绪的影响[J].中国继续医学教育,2016,8(12):247-248.
[9]王岩峰. ST段抬高型心肌梗死急诊介入术治疗的临床护理配合方法研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(30):196-197.
[10]艾威,李翠琼,王永红.主动脉球囊反搏术辅助治疗急性心肌梗死并泵衰竭的护理进展研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2016,7(15):192-193.
[11]吴松鸽,刘晓静,韩露.急性心肌梗死患者行静脉溶栓与常规治疗的效果比较及护理[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(12):258-259.
[12]连美升,朱婉婷,陈建芳.优化急诊护理路径对急性心肌梗死患者静脉抢救效果及预后的影响[J].中国卫生标准管理,2017,8(27):182-184.