厚朴野生资源的野外回归植株苗期适应性评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Adaptability Evaluation of Wild Houpoёa officinalis Seedling in the Process of Reintroduction
  • 作者:谭美 ; 杨志玲 ; 杨旭 ; 程小燕
  • 英文作者:TAN Mei;YANG Zhi-ling;YANG Xu;CHENG Xiao-yan;Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding of Zhejiang Province;
  • 关键词:厚朴 ; 回归 ; 苗期性状 ; 适应性
  • 英文关键词:Houpoёa officinalis;;reintroduction;;seedling trait;;adaptability
  • 中文刊名:LYKX
  • 英文刊名:Forest Research
  • 机构:中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所浙江省林木育种技术研究重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:林业科学研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.32
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目“珍稀濒危木本药材厚朴繁育系统及其保护策略”(31270585);; 科技部农业科技成果转化项目“厚朴优良种源规范化培育关键技术示范”(2013GB24320613);; 林业公益性行业专项“南方林源多用途药用植物种质保护与选育技术”(200704022)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:LYKX201901018
  • 页数:8
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:11-1221/S
  • 分类号:128-135
摘要
[目的]对2个回归样地内8个不同种源厚朴幼苗生长适应性进行评价,为厚朴野生资源回归保护提供科学依据。[方法]观测幼苗生长性状指标,并运用主成分分析和灰色关联分析评价其回归适应性。[结果]表明:(1)厚朴回归苗木与理想种关联度为0.794 7;(2)1号回归样地(浙江磐安)和2号回归样地(浙江遂昌)与理想种关联度分别为0.774 1和0.815 4;(3)8个回归种源与理想种关联度由高到低分别为:浙江遂昌>浙江磐安>浙江安吉>福建光泽>杂交幼苗>江西庐山>福建建宁>江西铜鼓种源。[结论]厚朴野外回归幼苗总体长势良好,适应性较好,不同种源、同一种源在不同回归样地内生长差异较大,回归幼苗来源和回归地可能是影响其回归保护的关键因子。
        [Objective] In order to provide evidence for the protection of Houpoёa officinalis wild resources,this study evaluated the adaptability of 8 H. officinalis provenances at two reintroduction sample plots which located at Pan'an and Suichang of Zhejiang Province). [Method] Botanical characteristics including plant morphology and growth situation were observed and principal component analysis and gray-correlation analysis were used to evaluate the seedlings adaptability of reintroduction. [Result](1) The correlation coefficients of H. officinalis seedling in the process of reintroduction to the ideal species was 0.794 7;(2) The correlation coefficients of the two reintroduction sample plots to the ideal species was 0.774 1(Pan'an) and 0.815 4(Suichang);(3) The correlation coefficient of 8 H. officinalis provenances with the ideal species from high to low were Suichang provenance from Zhejiang Province, Pan'an provenance from Zhejiang Province, Anji provenance from Zhejiang Province, Guangze provenance from Fujian Province, hybird seedling, Lushan provenance from Jiangxi Province, Jianning province from Fujian Province and Tonggu provenance from Jiangxi Province. [Conclusion] The H. officinalis seedling in the process of reintroduction has good growth and good adaptability. The adaptability differed in different provenances and different habitats, the origin population and destination area for reintroduction may be the main factors affecting reintroduction.
引文
[1] Xia N H, Liu Y H, Nooteboom H P. Magnoliaceae[M] // Wu Z Y,Raven P H. Flora of China: Vol. 7. Beijing:Science Press & St. Louis:Missouri Botanical Garden, 2008: 64.
    [2] 斯金平, 张志松, 潘心平. 厚朴研究综述[J]. 浙江林业科技, 1994,14(1):51-54.
    [3] Tsai J R,Chong I W,Chen Y H,et al.Magnolol induces apoptosis via caspase-independent pathways in non-small cell lung cancer cells[J].Archives of Pharmacal Research,2014,37(4):548-557.
    [4] Hahm E R,Sakao K,Singh S V.Honokiol activates reactive oxygen species-mediated cytoprotective autophagy in human prostate cancer cells[J].Prostate,2014,74(12):1209-1221.
    [5] 傅立国. 中国植物红皮书 : 稀有濒危植物[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1991.
    [6] 郭承则, 马培珍, 郭大祝. 观赏兼药用的珍贵花木厚朴[J]. 中国花卉盆景, 2004, (10):16-17.
    [7] Ren H, Zhang Q, Lu H, et al. Wild plant species with extremely small populations require conservation and reintroduction in China[J]. Ambio, 2012, 41(8):913-917.
    [8] 汪越, 易慧琳, 邵玲,等. 紫背天葵(Begonia fimbristipula Hance)回归植株存活及叶片生物学特性研究[J]. 生态科学, 2017, 36(2):32-41.
    [9] 任海. 植物园与植物回归[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(9):945-950.
    [10] Godefroid S,Piazza C,Rossi G,et al. How successful are plant species reintroductions?[J].Biological Conservation,2011,144(2):672-682.
    [11] Eojr G, Kaye T N. Reintroduction of rare and endangered plants: common factors, questions and approaches[J]. Australian Journal of Botany, 2007, 55(3):362-370.
    [12] 肖培根, 陈士林, 张本刚,等. 中国药用植物种质资源迁地保护与利用[J]. 中国现代中药, 2010, 12(6):3-6.
    [13] Schemske D W, Husband B C, Ruckelshaus M H, et al. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants[J]. Ecology, 1994, 75(3):585-606.
    [14] Chen F Q, Xie Z Q, Xiong G M, et al. Reintroduction and population reconstruction of an endangered plant Myricaria laxiflora in the Three Gorges Reservoir area,China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(7):1811-1817.
    [15] 王洁. 凹叶厚朴繁育系统研究及其濒危的生殖生物学原因分析[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2012.
    [16] 麦静. 厚朴杂交亲本及子代遗传多样性分析[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2015.
    [17] Lauterbach D, Burkart M, Gemeinholzer B. Rapid genetic differentiation between ex situ and their in situ source populations: an example of the endangered Silene otites (Caryophyllaceae)[J]. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 168(1):64-75.
    [18] 李秀玲, 王晓国, 李春牛,等. 基于灰色关联分析方法评价13种野生兜兰的迁地保护适应性[J]. 植物科学学报, 2015, 33(3):326-335.
    [19] 邓聚龙. 灰色系统基本方法:汉英对照[M]. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 2005.
    [20] 李正文, 陈丽丽, 李志刚,等. 德保苏铁回归后几个生理指标的比较研究[J]. 广西植物, 2012, 32(2):243-247.
    [21] 杨志玲, 杨旭, 谭梓峰,等. 厚朴不同种源苗期生长模型的拟合[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 39(4):60-68.
    [22] 于华会, 杨志玲, 谭梓峰,等. 厚朴苗期性状及种源选择初步研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2010, 18(2):189-195.
    [23] 舒枭, 杨志玲, 杨旭,等. 不同种源厚朴苗期性状变异及主成分分析[J]. 植物科学学报, 2010, 28(5):623-630.
    [24] 冯正波, 庄平, 张超,等. 野生杜鹃花迁地保护适应性评价[J]. 植物分类与资源学报, 2004, 26(5):497-506.
    [25] Hai R, Zeng S, Li L, et al. Reintroduction of Tigridiopalma magnifica, a rare and critically endangered herb endemic to China[J]. Oryx, 2012, 46(3):391-398.
    [26] Ren H, Yang L, Liu N. Nurse plant theory and its application in ecological restoration in lower subtropics of China[J].Progress in Natural Science:Materials International,2008,18(2):137-142.
    [27] Hai R, Ma G, Zhang Q, et al. Moss is a key nurse plant for reintroduction of the endangered herb, Primulina tabacum Hance[J]. Plant Ecology, 2010, 209(2):313-320.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700