基于主成分分析与聚类分析的黄肉猕猴桃品种(系)主要果实性状的综合评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Fruit Characters of Yellow Flesh Kiwifruit Cultivars(Strains) Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis
  • 作者:陈璐 ; 廖光联 ; 杨聪 ; 黄春辉 ; 钟敏 ; 陶俊杰 ; 曲雪艳 ; 徐小彪
  • 英文作者:CHEN Lu;LIAO Guang-lian;YANG Cong;HUANG Chun-hui;ZHONG Min;TAO Jun-jie;QU Xue-yan;XU Xiao-biao;College of Agronomy/Institute of Kiwifruit,Jiangxi Agricultural University;
  • 关键词:黄肉猕猴桃 ; 果实性状 ; 主成分分析 ; 聚类分析 ; 综合评价
  • 英文关键词:yellow flesh kiwifruit;;fruit characters;;principal component analysis;;cluster analysis;;comprehensive evaluation
  • 中文刊名:JXND
  • 英文刊名:Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis
  • 机构:江西农业大学农学院/猕猴桃研究所;
  • 出版日期:2018-12-20
  • 出版单位:江西农业大学学报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.40;No.212
  • 基金:江西省重大科技专项(20161ACF60007);; 江西省现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(JXARS-05)~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JXND201806015
  • 页数:10
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:36-1028/S
  • 分类号:121-130
摘要
通过建立21个黄肉猕猴桃品种(系)的果实品质综合评价体系,为开发利用黄肉猕猴桃种质资源、丰富猕猴桃市场和建立高效的栽培技术提供理论依据。以21个黄肉猕猴桃品种(系)为试材,测定其果形指数、单果质量、可溶性固形物、干物质、可滴定酸、可溶性糖、维生素C、类胡萝卜素等主要性状,对其进行主成分分析,根据综合得分对这21个黄肉猕猴桃品种(系)进行排序,并进一步对主要果实性状做系统聚类分析。结果表明:供试的21个黄肉猕猴桃品种(系)的主要果实性状变异程度不同,其中维生素C含量的变异最大,果形指数的变异系数最小。经主成分分析提取出3个特征根大于1的公因子,累计方差贡献率为79.121%,决定第1主成分大小的主要是糖酸比、固酸比、可溶性糖、可溶性固形物、维生素C和可滴定酸;决定第2主成分大小的主要是可滴定酸、果形指数和干物质;决定第3主成分大小的主要是类胡萝卜素和维生素C。聚类分析在欧氏距离5处将21个黄肉猕猴桃品种(系)分成6类,聚类结果与主成分分析的综合性状得分排序结果基本一致。在江西省奉新地区‘WN-1’、‘云海1号’、‘庐山香’、‘华优’和‘金果’的综合品质表现较好,‘金丰’、‘YH-1’、‘FH-4’、‘金什1号’和‘金桃’综合品质表现较差。
        A comprehensive evaluation system for fruit quality of 21 cultivars( strains) of yellow flesh ki-wifruit was established to provide a theoretical basis for the development and utilization of the germplasm re-sources of yellow flesh kiwifruit,enriching the market of kiwifruit and establishing efficient cultivation techniques.The fruit shape index,fruit mass,soluble solids content,dry matter,titratable acid,soluble sugar,vitamin Cand carotenoid were measured.These characters were analyzed by principal component analysis( PCA),andthe 21 yellow kiwifruit cultivars were ranked according to the comprehensive scores. Furthermore,the maincharacters of fruit were further analyzed using systematic cluster analysis.The results showed that the variationdegrees of the main fruit characters of the 21 yellow flesh kiwifruit varieties were different.The variation coef-ficient of vitamin c content was the largest,and the coefficient of variation of fruit shape index was the least.Three common factors with characteristic roots greater than 1 were extracted by PCA,and the cumulative va-riance contribution rate was 79.121%.The main factors determining the size of the first principal componentwere the ratio of sugar-to-acid,solid-acid,soluble sugar,soluble solids,and vitamin C. And the titratableacid,fruit shape index and dry matter determined the size of the second principal component.The size of themain component of the third principal component was mainly carotenoids and vitamin C. 21 yellow flesh ki-wifruit cultivars were divided into 6 groups in the cluster analysis at a Euclidean distance of 5.And the resultsof clustering were basically consistent with the results of the principal component analysis.The comprehensivequality of ‘WN-1',‘Yunhai 1',‘Lushanxiang',‘Huayou'and ‘Jinguo'in Fengxin area,Jiangxi Prov-ince performed well in this study,while the overall quality performance of ‘Jinfeng',‘YH-1',‘FH-4',‘Jinshi 1'and‘Jintao'was poor.
引文
[1]徐小彪,张秋明.中国猕猴桃种质资源的研究与利用[J].植物学通报,2003,20(6):648-655.Xu X B,Zhang Q M.Researches and utilizations of germplasm resources of kiwifruit in China[J].Chinese Bulletin of Bota-ny,2003,20(6):648-655.
    [2]黄春辉,葛翠莲,高洁,等.不同类型猕猴桃果实发育过程中内果皮色泽的动态变化[J].江西农业大学学报,2014,36(3):501-506.Huang C H,Ge C L,Gao J,et al.Dynamic changes in flesh color in different kiwifruit types during fruit development[J].Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis,2014,36(3):501-506.
    [3]Vainionpaa J,Smolander M,Alakomi H L,et al.Comparison of different analytical methods in the monitoring of the quality ofmodified atmosphere packaged broiler chicken cuts using principal component analysis.[J]. Journal of Food Engineering,2004,65(2):273-280.
    [4]符勇,陶菲,郜海燕,等.荔枝干品质评价指标体系的建立[J].中国食品学报,2013,13(1):158-164.Fu Y,Tao F,Gao H Y,et al.Establishment of quality evaluation index system for dehydrated litchi[J].Journal of ChineseInstitute of Food Science and Technology,2013,13(1):158-164.
    [5]张运锋,黄光和,李希国,等.普通菜豆农艺性状相关性分析及主成分分析[J].安徽农学通报,2008,14(7):97-98.Zhang Y F,Huang G H,Li X G,et al.Correlation analysis and principal component analysis of agronomic traits of commonbean[J].Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin,2008,14(7):97-98.
    [6]段卞慧,冯一峰,林敏娟,等.引进16个鲜食枣品种品质性状的主成分分析和综合评价[J].新疆农业科学,2017,54(12):2198-2210.Duan B H,Feng Y F,Lin M J,et al.Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the quality traits of 16fresh Chinese jujube varieties introduced[J].Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences,2017,54(12):2198-2210.
    [7]曲雪艳,郎彬彬,钟敏,等.野生毛花猕猴桃果实品质主成分分析及综合评价[J].中国农学通报,2016,32(1):92-96.Qu X Y,Lang B B,Zhong M,et al.Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of Actinidiaeriantha[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2016,32(1):92-96.
    [8]仇占南,张茹阳,彭明朗,等.北京野生软枣猕猴桃果实品质综合评价体系[J].中国农业大学学报,2017,22(2):45-53.Qiu Z N,Zhang R Y,Peng M L,et al.Comprehensive evaluation system of the fruit quality of wild Actinidia arguta in Bei-jing[J].Joutnal China Agricultural University,2017,22(2):45-53.
    [9]邓健康,刘璇,吴昕烨,等.基于层次分析和灰色关联度法的苹果(等外果)汁品质评价[J].中国食品学报,2017,17(4):197-208.Deng J K,Liu X,Wu X Y,et al.Quality evaluation of apple(substandard)juice from different cultivars based on analytichierarchy process and grey interconnect degree analysis[J].Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology,2017,17(4):197-208.
    [10]杨玲,张彩霞,康国栋,等.‘华红’苹果果肉的流变特性及其主成分分析[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(12):2417-2427.Yang L,Zhang C X,Kang G D,et al.Rheologic properties of‘Huahong’apple pulp and their principal component analysis[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2015,48(12):2417-2427.
    [11]王伟,吕旭健,张玉,等.基于聚类分析和主成分分析法的杨梅营养品质评价研究[J].食品工业科技,2017,38(1):278-280.Wang W,LüX J,Zhang Y,et al. Evaluation of nutritional quality of red bayberry based on cluster analysis and principalcomponent[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry,2017,38(1):278-280.
    [12]倪志华,张思思,辜青青,等.基于多元统计法的南丰蜜橘品质评价指标的选择[J].果树学报,2011,28(5):918-923.Ni Z H,Zhang S S,Gu Q Q,et al.Evaluation of fruit quality of Nanfeng Tangerine based on multivariate statistics[J].Jour-nal of Fruit Science,2011,28(5):918-923.
    [13]齐晓茹,侯丽娟,师旭,等.不同年份、不同葡萄品种葡萄酒品质特征分析研究[J].食品工业科技,2017,38(9):285-289.Qi X R,Hou L J,Shi X,et al.Research of quality characteristics in grape wines from different aging vintages,grape varieties[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry,2017,38(9):285-289.
    [14]刘丙花,孙锐,王开芳,等.不同蓝莓品种果实品质比较与综合评价[J/OL].食品科学:1-9[2018-02-25].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2206.TS.20171212.1612.090.html.Liu B H,Sun R,Wang K F,et al.Comparison and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of different blueberry(Vaccini-um Spp.)varieties[J/OL]. Food Science,1-9[2018-02-25]. http://kns. cnki. net/kcms/detail/11. 2206. TS. 2017121 2.1612.090.html.
    [15]王俊宇,尹蓉,张倩茹,等.16个草莓品种品系果实品质的多元分析与评价[J].农学学报,2017,7(9):36-41.Wang J Y,Yin R,Zhang Q R,et al.Multivariate analysis and evaluation on fruit quality of 16 strawberry varieties and strains[J].Journal of Agriculture,2017,7(9):36-41.
    [16]冷传祝,王鹏翔,王威,等.不同采收成熟度树上干杏的品质分析[J].食品研究与开发,2017,38(11):1-4.Leng C Z,Wang P X,Wang W,et al.Quality analysis of ‘Shushanggan’apricot at different ripening stages[J].Food Re-search and Development,2017,38(11):1-4.
    [17]李云晋.非标准化数据的聚类分析方法[J].昆明冶金高等专科学校学报,2005,21(1):34-36.Li Y J.Clustering analysis method for non-standardized data[J].Journal of Kunming Metallurgy College,2005,21(1):34-36.
    [18]蔡晓洋,张思荻,曾俊,等.基于主成分分析和聚类分析的栀子种质资源评价[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2017,23(14):30-37.Cai X Y,Zhang S D,Zeng J,et al.Evaluation of germplasm resources of gardeniae fructus based on principal component andhierarchical cluster analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2017,23(14):30-37.
    [19]徐回林,辜青青.利用主成分分析和聚类分析综合评价南丰蜜橘果实品质[C]//中国园艺学会设施园艺与园艺作物标准化生产技术交流会,2012:6.Xu H L,Gu Q Q.Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of Nanfeng tangerine by principal component analysis and clusteranalysis[C]//Chinese Society for Horticultural Science:Workshop on Standardization production Technology of protectedHorticulture and Horticultural crops,2012:6.
    [20]张海英,韩涛,王有年,等.桃果实品质评价因子的选择[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(8):235-239.Zhang H Y,Han T,Wang Y N,et al.Selection of factors for evaluating peach(Prunus persica)fruit quality[J].Transactionsof the Chinese Society of Agricultural Enginering,2006,22(8):235-239.
    [21]傅隆生,宋思哲,邵玉玲,等.基于主成分分析和聚类分析的海沃德猕猴桃品质指标综合评价[J].食品科学,2014,35(19):6-10.Fu L S,Song S Z,Shao Y L,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of kiwifruit quality based on principal component and cluster a-nalysis[J].Food Science,2014,35(19):6-10.
    [22]公丽艳,孟宪军,刘乃侨,等.基于主成分与聚类分析的苹果加工品质评价[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(13):276-285.Gong L Y,Meng X J,Liu N Q,et al.Evaluation of apple quality based on principal component and hierarchical cluster anal-ysis[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2014,30(13):276-285.
    [23]雷莹,张红艳,宋文华,等.利用多元统计法简化夏橙果实品质的评价指标[J].果树学报,2008,25(5):640-645.Lei Y,Zhang H Y,Song W H,et al.Utilization of multivariate statistics in simplifying the indices of fruit quality evaluationon late orange cultivars[J].Journal of Fruit Science,2008,25(5):640-645.
    [24]曹建康,姜微波.果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2007.Cao J K,Jiang W B.Post-harvest physiology and biochemistry experiment guidance in fruits and vegetables[M]. Beijing:China Light Industry Press,2007.
    [25]于国萍.食品生物化学实验[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2012.Yu G P.Biochemistry experiment of food[M].Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House,2012.
    [26]高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.Gao J F.Plant physiology experiment guide[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press,2006.
    [27]汤佳乐,黄春辉,刘科鹏,等.野生毛花猕猴桃叶片与果实As A含量变异分析[J].江西农业大学学报,2013,35(5):982-987.Tang J L,Huang C H,Liu K P,et al.A mutation analysis of ascorbic acid content in the leaves and fruit of wild Actinidiaeriantha Benth[J].Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis,2013,35(5):982-987.
    [28]刘科鹏,黄春辉,冷建华,等.‘金魁’猕猴桃果实品质的主成分分析与综合评价[J].果树学报,2012,29(5):867-871.Liu K P,Huang C H,Leng J H,et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of‘Jinkui’kiwifruit[J].Journal of Fruit Science,2012,29(5):867-871.
    [29]倪志华,郭娟华,辜青青,等.南丰蜜橘品质评价指标的聚类分析[J].江西农业大学学报,2011,33(4):670-673.Ni Z H,Guo J H,Gu Q Q,et al.Cluster analysis of fruit quality evaluation indices of Nanfeng Tangerine[J].Acta Agricultu-rae Universitatis Jiangxiensis,2011,33(4):670-673.
    [30]Khan N,Mukhtar H.Modulation of signaling pathways in prostate cancer by green tea polyphenols[J].Biochemical Pharma-cology,2013,85(5):667-72.
    [31]马庆华,李永红,梁丽松,等.冬枣优良单株果实品质的因子分析与综合评价[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(12):2491-2499.Ma Q H,Li Y H,Liang L S,et al.Factor analysis and synthetical evaluation of the fruit quality of dongzao(Ziziphus jujubaMill.‘Dongzao’)advanced selections[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2010,43(12):2491-2499.
    [32]徐臣善,高东升.基于主成分分析的设施桃果实品质综合评价[J].食品工业科技,2014,35(23):84-88.Xu C S,Gao D S.Comprehensive evaluation on fruit quality of peach cultivars in greenhouse based on prinpcipal conpenentanalysis[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry,2014,35(23):84-88.
    [33]林海明,张文霖.主成分分析与因子分析的异同和SPSS软件—兼与刘玉玫、卢纹岱等同志商榷[J].统计研究,2005,22(3):65-69.Lin H M,Zhang W L.Similarities and differences between principal component analysis and factor analysis and SPSS soft-ware[J].Statistical Research,2005,22(3):65-69.
    [34]袁华玲,周亚兰,陈延松,等.不同品种黄肉猕猴桃品质分析[J].合肥师范学院学报,2016,34(6):50-52.Yuan H L,Zhou Y L,Chen Y S,et al.The analysis and evaluation on yellow-fleshed kiwifruit quality of different variety[J].Journal of Hefei Normal University,2016,34(6):50-52.
    [35]李伟,郜海燕,陈杭君,等.基于主成分分析的不同品种杨梅果实综合品质评价[J].中国食品学报,2017,17(6):161-171.Li W,Gao H Y,Chen H J,et al. Evaluation of comprehensive quality of different varieties of bayberry based on principalcomponents analysis[J].Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology,2017,17(6):161-171.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700