基于组织合法性与社会化行为的文件形成机制研究
|
摘要
组织文件在传统认知中被视为组织事务的客观记录,而近年来的研究却表明其形成涉及诸多社会因素,其本质是社会建构的产物。本文提出一个宏观与微观相结合的解释框架,对具有社会建构性本质的组织文件形成机制进行综合解释,宏观解释层次基于组织合法性视角,微观解释层次基于组织成员的社会化文件形成行为。宏观层次的解释路径包括组织文件是组织合法性的承载物、象征物与建构性资源。微观层次的解释路径则指出组织成员的社会化行为包含两个层次:一个层次是组织成员通过惩罚、模仿和规范学习机制对于社会化文件形成行为的习得过程;另一个层次是组织成员在文件形成过程中采取的迎合、回避、选择等具体策略。
Organizational records are regarded as an objective record of organizational affairs in traditional cognition.However,recent studies have shown that the creation of organizational records involves many social factors,and its essence is the product of social construction.This paper proposes an interpretation framework combining macro and micro perspectives.It comprehensively explains the organizational records formation mechanism with social constructive essence.The macro interpretation level is based on the perspective of organizational legitimacy,and the micro interpretation level is based on the social records formation behavior of the organization members.The explanation path at the macro level includes that the organization document is the bearer,symbol and constructive resource of the organization's legitimacy.The micro-level explanation path points out that the social behavior of an organization member consists of two levels:one is the acquisition process of the organization's members through punishment,imitation,and standardization of the learning mechanism for the formation of socialized documents; the other is specific strategies such as meeting,avoiding,and selecting are adopted in the records formation process.
Organizational records are regarded as an objective record of organizational affairs in traditional cognition.However,recent studies have shown that the creation of organizational records involves many social factors,and its essence is the product of social construction.This paper proposes an interpretation framework combining macro and micro perspectives.It comprehensively explains the organizational records formation mechanism with social constructive essence.The macro interpretation level is based on the perspective of organizational legitimacy,and the micro interpretation level is based on the social records formation behavior of the organization members.The explanation path at the macro level includes that the organization document is the bearer,symbol and constructive resource of the organization's legitimacy.The micro-level explanation path points out that the social behavior of an organization member consists of two levels:one is the acquisition process of the organization's members through punishment,imitation,and standardization of the learning mechanism for the formation of socialized documents; the other is specific strategies such as meeting,avoiding,and selecting are adopted in the records formation process.
引文
[1]Ciaran B.Trace.Resistance and the Underlife:Informal Written Literacies and Their Relationship to Human Information Behavior[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2008,59(10):1540-1554.
[2][12]Nancy Cochran,Andrew C.Gordon,and Merton S.Krause.Proactive Records:Reflections on the Village Watchman[J].Science Communication,1980,2(1):5-18.
[3]Merry Morash.Establishment of a Juvenile Police Record:The Influence of Individual and Peer Group Characteristics[J].Criminology,1984,22(1):97-111.
[4][14][23]John Van Maanen and Brian T.Pentland.Cops and Auditors:The Rhetoric of Records[M]//Sim B.Sitkin and Robert J.Bies.The Legalistic Organization.Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications,1994:73,77,61.
[5][27]Ciaran B.Trace.What is Recorded is Never Simply What Happened:Record Keeping in Modern Organizational Culture[J].Archival Science,2002(2):137-159.
[6]贾春增.外国社会学史[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000:242.
[7][8][10][15]周雪光.组织社会学十讲[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003:73,74,78,77.
[9][16][17][18][20]W.理查德·斯科特.制度与组织--思想观念与物质利益[M].姚伟,王黎芳,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010:69-71,180,27,28,32.
[11]张慧玉,杨俊.组织话语研究述评及展望[J].外国经济与管理,2016,38(7):57-75.
[13]付磊.刑事司法科层制之反思[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2016:31.
[19]苏海泉.多视角下的组织合法性策略研究[J].现代管理科学,2018(1):100-102.
[21]赵孟营.现代社会中个人与组织如何联结:理性的行动关联[J].人文杂志,2006(2):140-146.
[22]DiMaggio,Powell.The Iron Cage Revisited:Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields[J].American Sociological Review,1983,48(2):147-160.
[24]Ciaran B.Trace.Information Creation and the Notion of Membership[J].Journal of Documentation,2007,63(1):142-163.
[25]Malcolm Coulthard.The Official Version:Audience Manipulation in Police Records of Interviews with Suspects[M]//Carmen Rosa,Caldas Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard.Texts and Practices:Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis.London:Routledge,1996:166-178.
[26]Albert J.Meehan.Internal Police Records and the Control of Juveniles:Politics and Policing in a Suburban Town British Journal of Criminology,1993,33(3):504-524.
[2][12]Nancy Cochran,Andrew C.Gordon,and Merton S.Krause.Proactive Records:Reflections on the Village Watchman[J].Science Communication,1980,2(1):5-18.
[3]Merry Morash.Establishment of a Juvenile Police Record:The Influence of Individual and Peer Group Characteristics[J].Criminology,1984,22(1):97-111.
[4][14][23]John Van Maanen and Brian T.Pentland.Cops and Auditors:The Rhetoric of Records[M]//Sim B.Sitkin and Robert J.Bies.The Legalistic Organization.Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications,1994:73,77,61.
[5][27]Ciaran B.Trace.What is Recorded is Never Simply What Happened:Record Keeping in Modern Organizational Culture[J].Archival Science,2002(2):137-159.
[6]贾春增.外国社会学史[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000:242.
[7][8][10][15]周雪光.组织社会学十讲[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003:73,74,78,77.
[9][16][17][18][20]W.理查德·斯科特.制度与组织--思想观念与物质利益[M].姚伟,王黎芳,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010:69-71,180,27,28,32.
[11]张慧玉,杨俊.组织话语研究述评及展望[J].外国经济与管理,2016,38(7):57-75.
[13]付磊.刑事司法科层制之反思[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2016:31.
[19]苏海泉.多视角下的组织合法性策略研究[J].现代管理科学,2018(1):100-102.
[21]赵孟营.现代社会中个人与组织如何联结:理性的行动关联[J].人文杂志,2006(2):140-146.
[22]DiMaggio,Powell.The Iron Cage Revisited:Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields[J].American Sociological Review,1983,48(2):147-160.
[24]Ciaran B.Trace.Information Creation and the Notion of Membership[J].Journal of Documentation,2007,63(1):142-163.
[25]Malcolm Coulthard.The Official Version:Audience Manipulation in Police Records of Interviews with Suspects[M]//Carmen Rosa,Caldas Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard.Texts and Practices:Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis.London:Routledge,1996:166-178.
[26]Albert J.Meehan.Internal Police Records and the Control of Juveniles:Politics and Policing in a Suburban Town British Journal of Criminology,1993,33(3):504-524.