科技论文审稿偏倚类型及应对措施
|
摘要
论文审稿是决定科技期刊发表稿件质量和保持期刊水平的重要环节。在这一过程中,审稿偏倚是影响审稿质量的重要因素之一。探讨审稿偏倚的来源、发生的规律以及如何应对具有重要意义。鉴于此,文章将审稿偏倚按照来源分成4个类型,对每个类型逐一分析,并提出相应的应对措施,以期为期刊编辑提供一些有价值的提示和帮助,进而更好地选择和邀请审稿人。
Peer review has great significance in regarding the quality of manuscripts and the academic level of journals.In this course,a vital factor affecting the quality of reviewing is the peer review bias.It is greatly meaningful for editors to investigate the sources of these bias,analysis their occurrence rules and conclude the strategies to cope with them.Consequently,this study classifies these bias into four types,analyses them profoundly and proposes the corresponding strategies,so as to provide some valuable hints and instructions in selec ting and inviting peer reviewers.
Peer review has great significance in regarding the quality of manuscripts and the academic level of journals.In this course,a vital factor affecting the quality of reviewing is the peer review bias.It is greatly meaningful for editors to investigate the sources of these bias,analysis their occurrence rules and conclude the strategies to cope with them.Consequently,this study classifies these bias into four types,analyses them profoundly and proposes the corresponding strategies,so as to provide some valuable hints and instructions in selec ting and inviting peer reviewers.
引文
[1]王桂珍.科技期刊审稿偏倚与编辑作为[J].南阳师范学院学报,2007(11):79-80.
[2]王福军.刍议医学期刊如何提高审稿质量[J].遵义医学院学报,2005(6):591-593.
[3]郭焕芳,邓颖,岳瑞,等.发挥审稿人作用提高科技期刊质量[J].中国科技信息,2012(10):167-168.
[4]DANIEL H D.Guardians of science:fairness and reliability of peer review[M].Weinheim Wiley-VCH,1993.
[5]熊松.提高科技期刊审稿质量的几点思考[J].出版科学,2010(4):35-36.
[6]ROOYEN V S.The evaluation of peer-review quality[J].Learned Publishing,2001(2):85-91.
[7]KLIEWER M A,FREED K S,DELONG D M,et al.Reviewing the reviewers:comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology[J].Ajr American Journal of Roentgenology,2005(6):1731.
[8]BLACK N.What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical Journal?[J].JAMA,1998(3):231.
[9]ARTHUR T E,ROBERT A M,SUZANNE W F,et al.The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews[J].Journal of General Internal Medicine,1993(8):422-428.
[10]NYLENNA M,RIIS P,KARLSSON Y.Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts effects of referee characteristics and publication language[J].JAMA,1994(2):149.
[11]STOSSEL T P.Reviewer status and review quality,experience of the Journal of Clinical Investigation[J].New England Journal of Medicine,1985(10):658-659.
[12]CALLAHAM M L,WEARS R L,WAECKERLE JF.Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance[J].Annals of Emergency Medicine,1998(3):318-322.
[13]WAGER E,PARKIN E C,TAMBER P S.Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors?Results of a rater-blinded,retrospective study[J].BMC Medicine,2006(5):4-13.
[14]卢圣芳.对科技期刊审稿专家的选择与搭配[J].长江大学学报(社会科学版),2010(4):111-112.
[15]李群,袁桂清.科技期刊审稿偏倚及其控制[J].中国科技期刊研究,2001(4):295-297.
[16]BORNMANN L,DANIEL H D.The effectiveness of the peer review process:inter-referee agreement and predictive validity of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie[J].Angewandte Chemie International Edition,2010(38):7173-7178.
[17]HARGENS L L,HERTING J R.Neglected considerations in the analysis of agreement among journal referees[J].Scientometrics,1990(1-2):91-106.
[2]王福军.刍议医学期刊如何提高审稿质量[J].遵义医学院学报,2005(6):591-593.
[3]郭焕芳,邓颖,岳瑞,等.发挥审稿人作用提高科技期刊质量[J].中国科技信息,2012(10):167-168.
[4]DANIEL H D.Guardians of science:fairness and reliability of peer review[M].Weinheim Wiley-VCH,1993.
[5]熊松.提高科技期刊审稿质量的几点思考[J].出版科学,2010(4):35-36.
[6]ROOYEN V S.The evaluation of peer-review quality[J].Learned Publishing,2001(2):85-91.
[7]KLIEWER M A,FREED K S,DELONG D M,et al.Reviewing the reviewers:comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology[J].Ajr American Journal of Roentgenology,2005(6):1731.
[8]BLACK N.What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical Journal?[J].JAMA,1998(3):231.
[9]ARTHUR T E,ROBERT A M,SUZANNE W F,et al.The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews[J].Journal of General Internal Medicine,1993(8):422-428.
[10]NYLENNA M,RIIS P,KARLSSON Y.Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts effects of referee characteristics and publication language[J].JAMA,1994(2):149.
[11]STOSSEL T P.Reviewer status and review quality,experience of the Journal of Clinical Investigation[J].New England Journal of Medicine,1985(10):658-659.
[12]CALLAHAM M L,WEARS R L,WAECKERLE JF.Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance[J].Annals of Emergency Medicine,1998(3):318-322.
[13]WAGER E,PARKIN E C,TAMBER P S.Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors?Results of a rater-blinded,retrospective study[J].BMC Medicine,2006(5):4-13.
[14]卢圣芳.对科技期刊审稿专家的选择与搭配[J].长江大学学报(社会科学版),2010(4):111-112.
[15]李群,袁桂清.科技期刊审稿偏倚及其控制[J].中国科技期刊研究,2001(4):295-297.
[16]BORNMANN L,DANIEL H D.The effectiveness of the peer review process:inter-referee agreement and predictive validity of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie[J].Angewandte Chemie International Edition,2010(38):7173-7178.
[17]HARGENS L L,HERTING J R.Neglected considerations in the analysis of agreement among journal referees[J].Scientometrics,1990(1-2):91-106.