杰拉德·维兹诺的《自由的恶作剧者》中的狂欢化研究
|
摘要
在《自由的恶作剧者》中,杰拉德.维兹诺开篇传达了对美国白人政府颁发的道斯法案强行的侵占印第安人的土地来挤压生存空间以及后续的同化政策极度不满。作者通过巴赫金的狂欢理论,借助印第安传统中独特的"恶作剧者"形象和他们的反叛精神,戏讽和打破常规品质,反抗了主流社会(白人群体)对边缘社会(印第安民族)的压迫。恶作剧者们分别从狂欢化的反教条主义,反二元对立,和反排他性三方面提升了民族的社会地位,同时完成了印第安民族文化传统的保留和重塑,保证了未来的发展。
In The Tricksters of Liberty, from the beginning, Gerald Vizenor delivers his extreme dissatisfaction for the Dawes Act the American government enacted which forcibly invades and occupies Indian land to compress their living space and for the consequential assimilation policy. Through Bakhtin' s Carnival theory, by means of particular "trickster figure" in Indian tradition and their rebellion spirit, the traits of buffoonery and breaking away from conventions,Vizenor subverts the oppression from dominant society(Whites community) to marginal society( Indian community). Tricksters elevate the social status respectively from carnival anti-dogmatism,anti-dualism and anti-exclusiveness, and at the same time, they accomplish the survivance and reconstruction and guarantee the future development.
In The Tricksters of Liberty, from the beginning, Gerald Vizenor delivers his extreme dissatisfaction for the Dawes Act the American government enacted which forcibly invades and occupies Indian land to compress their living space and for the consequential assimilation policy. Through Bakhtin' s Carnival theory, by means of particular "trickster figure" in Indian tradition and their rebellion spirit, the traits of buffoonery and breaking away from conventions,Vizenor subverts the oppression from dominant society(Whites community) to marginal society( Indian community). Tricksters elevate the social status respectively from carnival anti-dogmatism,anti-dualism and anti-exclusiveness, and at the same time, they accomplish the survivance and reconstruction and guarantee the future development.
引文
[1]Bruchac,J.1987."Follow the Trickroutes:An Interview with Gerald Vizenor."Survival This Way:Interviews with American Indian Poets[M].Tucson:University of Arizona Press.
[2]Lee,A.1999.Postindian Conversations:Gerald Vizenor and A.Robert Lee[M].Lincoln:University of Nebraska Press.
[3]Linda,R.1999.Gerald Vizenor:Writing in the Oral Tradition[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press.
[4]Vizenor,G.1988.The Trickster of Liberty:Native Heirs to a Wild Baronage[M].Norman:University of Oklahoma Press.
[5]高丽萍.2017.从对抗到对话——摆脱中西文化二元对立的后殖民主义启示[J].特约书评人专栏,(7):30-33.
[6]刘保民.2017.教条主义的多维审视[J].陕西大学学报(社会科学版),(3):1-3.
[7]刘康.2011.对话的喧声——巴赫金的文化转型理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
[8]李雪梅张淑琴.2017.恶作剧者的空间政治一解读维兹诺的小说《自由的恶作剧者》[J].当代外国文学,(2):13-17.
[9]林贤治主编.1998.巴赫金集[C],上海:上海远东出版社.
[10]秦苏钰.2010.生态批评视野中的当代美国土著小说研究[D].成都:四川大学外国语学院.
[11]夏忠宪.2000.巴赫金狂欢化诗学研究[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社.
[2]Lee,A.1999.Postindian Conversations:Gerald Vizenor and A.Robert Lee[M].Lincoln:University of Nebraska Press.
[3]Linda,R.1999.Gerald Vizenor:Writing in the Oral Tradition[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press.
[4]Vizenor,G.1988.The Trickster of Liberty:Native Heirs to a Wild Baronage[M].Norman:University of Oklahoma Press.
[5]高丽萍.2017.从对抗到对话——摆脱中西文化二元对立的后殖民主义启示[J].特约书评人专栏,(7):30-33.
[6]刘保民.2017.教条主义的多维审视[J].陕西大学学报(社会科学版),(3):1-3.
[7]刘康.2011.对话的喧声——巴赫金的文化转型理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
[8]李雪梅张淑琴.2017.恶作剧者的空间政治一解读维兹诺的小说《自由的恶作剧者》[J].当代外国文学,(2):13-17.
[9]林贤治主编.1998.巴赫金集[C],上海:上海远东出版社.
[10]秦苏钰.2010.生态批评视野中的当代美国土著小说研究[D].成都:四川大学外国语学院.
[11]夏忠宪.2000.巴赫金狂欢化诗学研究[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社.