语篇衔接的主体可及性分析路径探索
|
摘要
语篇衔接研究长期以来主要围绕话语的本体属性展开。在话语认知研究的影响下,衔接的概念本质、手段分类、研究范围等问题值得进一步探讨。本研究以"主体可及性"话语分析模式为视角,在全面反思上述问题的同时,探索语篇衔接的话语主体属性,进而重新界定衔接与连贯的关系。在此基础上,本文试图通过主体可及性框架下的"话语可及"视角改进和发展传统的衔接分析手段,重新解读其相应的语篇组织机制。
Discourse cohesion has long been investigated in line with its discursive attribute. The cognitive perspective on discourse analysis results in a further survey of the nature of cohesion, the classification of cohesive devices, as well as the scope of cohesion research. The present study, on the basis of Subjects' Accessibility(SA), is directed towards a reflection on the above issues to explore the subject's attribute of discourse and redefine the relationship between cohesion and coherence. This paper also attempts to revise and elaborate cohesive devices, and reinterpret their mechanisms in discourse organization by virtue of "discursive access" in the framework of SA.
Discourse cohesion has long been investigated in line with its discursive attribute. The cognitive perspective on discourse analysis results in a further survey of the nature of cohesion, the classification of cohesive devices, as well as the scope of cohesion research. The present study, on the basis of Subjects' Accessibility(SA), is directed towards a reflection on the above issues to explore the subject's attribute of discourse and redefine the relationship between cohesion and coherence. This paper also attempts to revise and elaborate cohesive devices, and reinterpret their mechanisms in discourse organization by virtue of "discursive access" in the framework of SA.
引文
Ariel,M.1994.Interpreting anaphoric expressions:A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach[J].Journal of Linguistics 30:3-42.
Beaugrande,R.&W.Dressler.1981.Introduction to Text Linguistics[M].London:Longman.
Beaver,D.2004.The optimization of discourse anaphora[J].Linguistics and Philosophy 27:3-56.
Berry,M.1977.Introduction to Systemic Linguistics[M].London:Batsford.
Blakemore,D.2002.Relevance and Linguistic Meaning:The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Connectives[M].Cambridge:CUP.
Brown,G.&G.Yule.1983.Discourse Analysis[M].Cambridge:CUP.
Halliday,M.1985/1994.An Introduction to Functional Grammar[M].London:Edward Arnold.
Halliday,M.&R.Hasan.1976.Cohesion in English[M].London:Longman.
Halliday,M.&R.Hasan.1985.Language,Context and Text:Aspects of Language as a Sociosemantic Perspective[M].Victoria:Deakin University Press.
Harnett,C.1986.Static and dynamic cohesion:Signals of thinking[A].In B.Conture(ed.).Functional Approaches in Writing:Research Perspectives[C].London:Printer.142-152.
Hoey,M.1991.Patterns of Lexis in Text[M].Oxford:OUP.
Martin,J.1992.English Text[M].Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
Matthiessen,C.1992.Interpreting the textual metafunction[A].In M.Davies&L.Ravelli(eds.).Systemic Linguistics:Recent Theory and Practice[C].London:Printer.37-82.
Mc Carthy,M.&R.Carter.1994.Language as Discourse:Perspectives for Language Teaching[M].London:Longman.
Nunan,D.1993.Discourse Analysis[M].London:Penguin Group.
Sanders,T.&M.Gernsbacher.2004.Accessibility in text and discourse processing[J].Discourse Processes 37(2):79-89.
Widdowson,H.1978.Teaching Language as Communication[M].Oxford:OUP.
胡曙中,2005,《英语语篇语言学研究》[M]。上海:上海外语教育出版社。
胡壮麟,1994,《语篇的衔接与连贯》[M]。上海:上海外语教育出版社。
张德禄,2005,语篇衔接中的形式与意义[J],《外国语》(5):32-38。
张德禄、刘汝山,2003,《语篇连贯与衔接理论的发展及应用》[M]。上海:上海外语教育出版社。
张玮,2015,话语研究的主体可及性理论模型及其应用[J],《中国外语》(4):26-32。
Beaugrande,R.&W.Dressler.1981.Introduction to Text Linguistics[M].London:Longman.
Beaver,D.2004.The optimization of discourse anaphora[J].Linguistics and Philosophy 27:3-56.
Berry,M.1977.Introduction to Systemic Linguistics[M].London:Batsford.
Blakemore,D.2002.Relevance and Linguistic Meaning:The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Connectives[M].Cambridge:CUP.
Brown,G.&G.Yule.1983.Discourse Analysis[M].Cambridge:CUP.
Halliday,M.1985/1994.An Introduction to Functional Grammar[M].London:Edward Arnold.
Halliday,M.&R.Hasan.1976.Cohesion in English[M].London:Longman.
Halliday,M.&R.Hasan.1985.Language,Context and Text:Aspects of Language as a Sociosemantic Perspective[M].Victoria:Deakin University Press.
Harnett,C.1986.Static and dynamic cohesion:Signals of thinking[A].In B.Conture(ed.).Functional Approaches in Writing:Research Perspectives[C].London:Printer.142-152.
Hoey,M.1991.Patterns of Lexis in Text[M].Oxford:OUP.
Martin,J.1992.English Text[M].Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
Matthiessen,C.1992.Interpreting the textual metafunction[A].In M.Davies&L.Ravelli(eds.).Systemic Linguistics:Recent Theory and Practice[C].London:Printer.37-82.
Mc Carthy,M.&R.Carter.1994.Language as Discourse:Perspectives for Language Teaching[M].London:Longman.
Nunan,D.1993.Discourse Analysis[M].London:Penguin Group.
Sanders,T.&M.Gernsbacher.2004.Accessibility in text and discourse processing[J].Discourse Processes 37(2):79-89.
Widdowson,H.1978.Teaching Language as Communication[M].Oxford:OUP.
胡曙中,2005,《英语语篇语言学研究》[M]。上海:上海外语教育出版社。
胡壮麟,1994,《语篇的衔接与连贯》[M]。上海:上海外语教育出版社。
张德禄,2005,语篇衔接中的形式与意义[J],《外国语》(5):32-38。
张德禄、刘汝山,2003,《语篇连贯与衔接理论的发展及应用》[M]。上海:上海外语教育出版社。
张玮,2015,话语研究的主体可及性理论模型及其应用[J],《中国外语》(4):26-32。