非农就业对林地流转的影响——基于双内生视角的MV Tobit估计
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The effects of off-farm employment on forestland transfer:the MV Tobit estimation with endogeneity perspectives
  • 作者:张寒 ; 杨红强 ; 陈海滨 ; 刘晶 ; 许时蕾 ; 刘浩 ; 刘璨
  • 英文作者:ZHANG Han;YANG Hongqiang;CHEN Haibin;LIU Jing;XU Shilei;LIU Hao;LIU Can;College of Economics and Management, Northwest A & F University;College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University;Economic and Development Research Center,State Forestry Administration;
  • 关键词:林地流转 ; 非农就业 ; 集体林改 ; 双内生农户决策模型 ; 影响因素 ; MV ; Tobit
  • 英文关键词:forestland transfer;;off-farm employment;;collective forest tenure reform;;endogenous household decision model;;influence factors;;Multivariate Tobit
  • 中文刊名:ZRZY
  • 英文刊名:Resources Science
  • 机构:西北农林科技大学经济管理学院;南京林业大学经济管理学院;国家林业局经济发展研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2018-08-25
  • 出版单位:资源科学
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.40
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金青年项目(71403213);; 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(18YJA790104);; 西北农林科技大学基本科研业务费人文社科项目(2018RWSK06)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZRZY201808002
  • 页数:10
  • CN:08
  • ISSN:11-3868/N
  • 分类号:13-22
摘要
新一轮集体林权制度改革后,林地的市场交易行为并未如政策预期。为了探讨非农就业是否阻碍了林地流转,本文构建了双内生农户决策模型,并利用国家林业局对全国9省区1497个农户的固定样本连续监测数据进行实证检验。考虑到林地流转和非农就业的双内生性、以及被解释变量的数据删截性问题,采用了多方程系统Tobit模型进行回归分析。研究结果显示,非农就业对林地流入具有显著的抑制作用;相反,非农就业对林地流出的作用并不显著,这与林地流转契约的长期性和林地生计保障功能密切相关;无论是对流入还是流出,交易成本都是一个重要的负向因素,且在1%的统计水平上显著;其他显著影响林地流转的因素还包括工资水平、林木价格、林地面积、林地细碎化程度、家庭人口数等,这些因素对林地流入和流出的影响方向相反。上述发现有助于理解林地流转不活跃的经济机理,为后续配套改革提供决策参考。
        After the new round of collective forest tenure reform, the forestland transactions seem still inactive in China, which is not as expected as policymakers. Under this background, it is crucial to understand what are the factors that determine farmers' behavior of forestland transfer.To investigate whether off-farm employment hinders forestland transfer, we established a household decision model, where the forestland transfer decision and off-farm employment decision are endogenous. Then the empirical analysis is performed based on a household survey dataset, which involves 1497 households from 9 provinces in China. This dataset is collected by the State Forestry Administration and is ranged from 2003 to 2013. Given the endogeneity of farmers' decision-making process, the off-farm employment should be regarded as an endogenous variable.Meanwhile, the fact that the majority of households didn't transfer their forestland implies that the explained variable is censored. Hence, the multivariate Tobit approach is applied to deal with the endogeneity and censoring issues. The results show that off-farm employment has a significantly negative effect on forestland rent-in, while the effect on rent-out is insignificant. This insignificance might be owing to the long-period feature of forestland transfer contracts and the role of forestland on household livelihood. For rural farmers, forestlands are considered to be a"safety net"once they lose their employments in off-farm sector. Moreover, transaction cost is an important factor that influence the decision of forestland transfer. That is, the variable of transaction cost imposes a negative effect on both rent-in and rent-out at the 1% statistical level.Besides, off-farm wage rate, timber prices, forestland area, forestland fragmentation, and the amount of household members also have significant effects on behaviors of forestland transfer.Their effects are opposite with regard to rent-in and rent-out behaviors. These findings will facilitate policymakers to understand what factors determine forestland transfer, and will provide beneficial suggestions in the following-up reform.
引文
[1]刘璨,张永亮,刘浩.我国集体林权制度改革现状、问题及对策-中国集体林产权制度改革相关政策问题研究报告[J].林业经济,2015,37(4):3-11.[Liu C,Zhang Y L,Liu H.The present situation,problems and countermeasures on the reform of collective forestland tenure in China:the report of key issues on reform of collective forestland tenure in China[J].Forestry Economics,2015,37(4):3-11.]
    [2]贺东航,朱冬亮.关于集体林权制度改革若干重大问题的思考[J].经济社会体制比较,2009,(2):21-28.[He D H,Zhu D L.Thinking on some important issues in the reform of collective forest property right system[J].Comparative Economic and Social Systems,2009,(2):21-28.]
    [3]Wang H,Tong J,Su F,et al.To reallocate or not:reconsidering the dilemma in China's agricultural land tenure policy[J].Land Use Policy,2011,28(4):805-814.
    [4]李周.林权改革的评价与思考[J].林业经济,2008,(9):3-8.[Li Z.Assessment and thinking on forestry property reformation[J].Forestry Economics,2008,(9):3-8.]
    [5]郜亮亮,黄季焜,Rozelle Scott,等.中国农地流转市场的发展及其对农户投资的影响[J].经济学(季刊),2011,10(4):1499-1514.[Gao L L,Huang J K,Rozelle S,et al.Emerging rental markets and investment in agricultural land in China[J].China Economic Quarterly,2011,10(4):1499-1514.]
    [6]国家林业局.深化集体林权制度改革提升经营发展水平[EB/OL].(2015-09-15)[2017-10-20].http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/195/content-800247.html.[State Forestry Administration of China.Deepen the Collective Forest Tenure Reform and Improve the Forestry Development Level[EB/OL].(2015-09-15)[2017-10-20].http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/195/content-800247.html.]
    [7]Deininger K,Jin S.The potential of land rental markets in the process of economic development:evidence from China[J].Journal of Development Economics,2005,78(1):241-270.
    [8]史清华,贾生华.农户家庭农地要素流动趋势及其根源比较[J].管理世界,2002,(1):71-77.[Shi Q H,Jia S H.A comparison between the farmland factor trend and its root[J].Management World,2002,(1):71-77.]
    [9]周来友,饶芳萍,马贤磊,等.丘陵地区非农就业类型对农地流转的影响-基于江西省东北部农户调查数据的分析[J].资源科学,2017,39(2):209-219.[Zhou L Y,Rao F P,Ma X L,et al.The effects of off-farm employment type on arable land transfer in hilly areas of Jiangxi[J].Resources Science,2017,39(2):209-219.]
    [10]钟甫宁,纪月清.土地产权、非农就业机会与农户农业生产投资[J].经济研究,2009,(12):43-51.[Zhong F N,Ji Y Q.Land rights,non-agricultural employment opportunities and farmers'agricultural investment[J].Economic Research,2009,(12):43-51.]
    [11]陈飞,翟伟娟.农户行为视角下农地流转诱因及其福利效应研究[J].经济研究,2015,50(10):163-177.[Chen F,Zhai W J.Land transfer incentive and welfare effect research from perspective of farmers'behavior[J].Economic Research,2015,50(10):163-177.]
    [12]黄枫,孙世龙.让市场配置农地资源:劳动力转移与农地使用权市场发育[J].管理世界,2015,(7):71-81.[Huang F,Sun S L.Market allocation of agricultural land resources:Labor transfer and the development of farmland use rights market[J].Management World,2015,(7):71-81.]
    [13]孔凡斌,廖文梅.基于收入结构差异化的农户林地流转行为分析-以江西省为例[J].中国农村经济,2011,(8):89-97.[Kong FB,Liao W M.An analysis of farmer households’woodland transferring behaviour based on their differential income structure-taking Jiangxi province as example[J].Chinese Rural Economy,2011,(8):89-97.]
    [14]谢屹,温亚利.农户林地林木转出行为影响因素的实证分析[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2009,8(4):48-54.[Xie Y,Wen Y L.Empirical study on the influence factors of farmers'forestland and forest transfer[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University(social science edition),2009,8(4):48-54.]
    [15]柯水发,李周,赵铁珍.农户林地使用权流转的成本收益分析及流转策略[J].农业经济问题,2011,32(5):71-77.[Ke S F,Li Z,Zhao T Z.The cost-benefit analysis and strategies on forest land use right transfer among households[J].Issues in Agricultural Economy,2011,32(5):71-77.]
    [16]王成军,费喜敏,徐秀英.农村劳动力转移与农户间林地流转-基于浙江省两个县(市)调查的研究[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(6):893-900.[Wang C J,Fei X M,Xu X Y.Rural labor transfer and woodland circulation between rural households-research statistics on two counties of Zhejiang province[J].Resources Science,2012,27(6):893-900.]
    [17]Feng S,Heerink N.Are farm households'land renting and migration decisions inter-related in rural China?[J].NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences,2008,55(4):345-362.
    [18]游和远,吴次芳.农地流转、禀赋依赖与农村劳动力转移[J].管理世界,2010,(3):65-75.[You H Y,Wu C F.Farmland circulation,endowment dependence and rural labor transfer[J].Management World,2010,(3):65-75.]
    [19]杜鑫.劳动力转移、土地租赁与农业资本投入的联合决策分析[J].中国农村经济,2013,(10):63-75.[Du X.Joint-decision making analysis of labor transfer,land lease and agriculture capital investment[J].Chinese Rural Economy,2013,(10):63-75.]
    [20]温涛,张梓榆,王定祥.城乡工资水平差距与农地流转[J].农业技术经济,2017,(2):4-14.[Wen T,Zhang Z Y,Wang D X.Wage difference between urban and rural and farmland transfer[J].Journal of Agrotechnical Economics,2017,(2):4-14.]
    [21]周华林,李雪松.Tobit模型估计方法与应用[J].经济学动态,2012,(5):105-119.[Zhou H L,Li X S.The estimation method and application of Tobit model[J].Economics Information,2012,(5):105-119.]
    [22]Carter M R,Yao Y.Local versus global separability in agricultural household models:the factor price equalization effect of land transfer rights[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2002,84(3):702-715.
    [23]Mullan K,Grosjean P,Kontoleon A.Land tenure arrangements and rural-urban migration in China[J].World Development,2011,39(1):123-133.
    [24]Louzada F,Ferreira P H.On the classical estimation of bivariate copula-based Seemingly unrelated Tobit models through the proposed inference function for augmented margins method[J].Journal of Data Science,2015,13(4):771-794.
    [25]王向楠,孙祁祥,王晓全.中国家庭寿险资产和其他资产选择研究-基于生命周期风险和资产同时配置[J].当代经济科学,2013,35(3):1-10.[Wang X N,Sun Q X,Wang X Q.On the selection of households'life insurance and other assets-based on life cycle risk and simultaneous assets allocation[J].Modern Economic Science,2013,35(3):1-10.]
    [26]苏卫良,刘承芳,张林秀.非农就业对农户家庭农业机械化服务影响研究[J].农业技术经济,2016,(10):4-11.[Su W L,Liu C F,Zhang L X.The impact of off-farm employment on agricultural mechanization service[J].Journal of Agrotechnical Economics,2016,(10):4-11.]
    [27]Lee L F.Multivariate Tobit Models in Econometrics[A].Maddala G S,Rao C R,Vinod H D.Handbook of Statistics[M].Amsterdam:North-Holland,2007.
    [28]Chen S,Zhou X.Semiparametric estimation of a bivariate Tobit model[J].Journal of Econometrics,2011,165(2):266-274.
    [29]Liu C,Susilo Y O,Karlstr?m A.Jointly modelling individual’s daily activity-travel time use and mode share by a nested multivariate Tobit model system[J].Transportmetrica A:Transport Science,2017,13(6):491-518.
    [30]国家林业局.中国森林资源报告(2009-2013)[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2014.[State Forestry Administration of China.Forest Resource Report of China(2009-2013)[M].Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House,2014.]
    [31]国家统计局.中国农村居民人均可支配收入[EB/OL].[2017-10-20].http://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01.[National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China.Per Capita Disposable Income of Rural Households[EB/OL].[2017-10-20].http://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01.]
    [32]许庆,刘进,钱有飞.劳动力流动、农地确权与农地流转[J].农业技术经济,2017,(5):4-16.[Xu Q,Liu J,Qian Y F.Labor mobility,farmland real right and farmland circulation[J].Journal of Agrotechnical Economics,2017,(5):4-16.]
    [33]林坚,李德洗.非农就业与粮食生产:替代抑或互补-基于粮食主产区农户视角的分析[J].中国农村经济,2013,(9):54-62.[Lin J,Li D X.Off-farm and food production:substitution or complementation-an analysis based on household in main food production areas[J].Chinese Rural Economy,2013,(9):54-62.]
    [34]Kimura S,Otsuka K,Sonobe T,et al.Efficiency of land allocation through tenancy markets:evidence from China[J].Economic Development and Cultural Change,2011,59(3):485-510.
    [35]Jin S,Deininger K.Land rental markets in the process of rural structural transformation:productivity and equity impacts from China[J].Journal of Comparative Economics,2009,37(4):629-646.
    [36]邹宝玲,仇童伟,罗必良,等.农地福利保障如何影响农地转出-基于制度保障与社区保障调节效应的分析[J].上海财经大学学报,2017,19(3):68-80.[Zou B L,Qin T W,Luo B L,et al.Impacts of farmland welfare security on farmland transfer-analysis based on moderating effects of institutional security and community security[J].Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,2017,19(3):68-80.]
    [37]苏群,汪霏菲,陈杰.农户分化与土地流转行为[J].资源科学,2016,38(3):377-386.[Su Q,Sun F F,Chen J.Rural-household differentiation and land transfer behavior[J].Resources Science,2016,38(3):377-386.]
    [38]徐珍源,孔祥智.转出土地流转期限影响因素实证分析-基于转出农户收益与风险视角[J].农业技术经济,2010,(7):30-40.[Xu Z Y,Kong X Z.Empirical analysis on the influence factors of land-out transfer term-based on the land-out farmers’income and risk[J].Journal of Agrotechnical Economics,2010,(7):30-40.]
    [39]叶剑平,丰雷,蒋妍,等.2008年中国农村土地使用权调查研究-17省份调查结果及政策建议[J].管理世界,2010,(1):64-73.[Ye J P,Feng Lei,Jiang Y,et al.Investigation and study on China rural land use right in 2008-17 provinces survey results and policy suggestions[J].Management World,2010,(1):64-73.]
    [40]Rupelle D L M,Deng Q,Shi L,et al.Land Rights Insecurity and Temporary Migration in Rural China[R].IZA discussion paper No.4668,2009.
    [41]罗必良,汪沙,李尚蒲.交易费用、农户认知与农地流转--来自广东省的农户问卷调查[J].农业技术经济,2012,(1):11-21.[Luo B L,Wang S,Li S P.Transaction cost,farmers’awareness and land transfer:a household survey from Guangdong province[J].Journal of Agrotechnical Economics,2012,(1):11-21.]
    [42]何欣,蒋涛,郭良燕,等.中国农地流转市场的发展与农户流转农地行为研究-基于2013~2015年29省的农户调查数据[J].管理世界,2016,(6):79-89.[He X,Jiang T,Guo L Y,et al.The development of China rural land transfer and study of farmer’transfer behavior-based on 29 provinces farmers’survey dates from 2013-2015[J].Management World,2016,(6):79-89.]
    [43]程名望,潘烜.个人特征、家庭特征对农村非农就业影响的实证[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(2):94-99.[Cheng M W,Pan X.Empirical analysis on the effects of individual features and family traits to non-farm employment[J].China Population Resources and Environment,2012,22(2):94-99.]
    [44]蒋乃华,卞智勇.社会资本对农村劳动力非农就业的影响-来自江苏的实证[J].管理世界,2007,(12):158-159.[Jiang N H,Bian Z Y.A research on the influence of social capital causing labor force in rural areas non-agricultural employment-empirical evidence from Jiangsu[J].Management World,2007,(12):158-159.]
    1)进行倒数化处理的原因是,取倒数之后的指标与交易成本在逻辑上是一致的,即倒数指标越大,交易成本越高;反之亦然。将倒数进一步进行对数化处理仅仅改变了估计值的符号,并不影响估计值的大小,即ln(1/x)=-ln(x)。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700