脊柱胸腰段骨折患者运用后路内固定融合术治疗的临床价值评估
|
摘要
目的:探讨脊柱胸腰段骨折运用后路内固定融合术治疗的临床价值。方法:随机将2016年8月-2017年8月笔者所在医院收治的脊柱胸腰段骨折患者80例分为两组,其中对照组行前固定术,而观察组则行后路内固定融合术,比较两组效果。结果:观察组治疗总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);同时,两组恢复情况比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:临床上给予脊柱胸腰段骨折患者后路内固定融合术治疗效果显著。
Objective:To explore the clinical value of posterior internal fixation and fusion for spinal thoracolumbar fracture.Method:A total of 80 cases of spinal thoracolumbar fracture patients admitted to our hospital from August 2016 to August 2017 were randomly divided into two groups,among which the control group received preimplantation surgery and the observation group received posterior internal fixation fusion surgery,and the effects of the two groups were compared.Result:The efficiency of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).At the same time,the recovery of the two groups was different(P<0.05).Conclusion:Posterior internal fixation and fusion for spinal thoracolumbar fracture is effective.
Objective:To explore the clinical value of posterior internal fixation and fusion for spinal thoracolumbar fracture.Method:A total of 80 cases of spinal thoracolumbar fracture patients admitted to our hospital from August 2016 to August 2017 were randomly divided into two groups,among which the control group received preimplantation surgery and the observation group received posterior internal fixation fusion surgery,and the effects of the two groups were compared.Result:The efficiency of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).At the same time,the recovery of the two groups was different(P<0.05).Conclusion:Posterior internal fixation and fusion for spinal thoracolumbar fracture is effective.
引文
[1]刘迎军.联用经后路椎弓根螺钉内固定术和伤椎内植骨术治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折的临床疗效观察[J].中国医药指南,2017,15(26):93-94.
[2]张顺聪,李大星,袁凯,等.后路减压固定融合术治疗伴椎管侵占的骨质疏松性重度椎体骨折塌陷的疗效评价[J].广州中医药大学学报,2017,34(4):504-509.
[3]赵艳君,赵玉.后路内固定融合术治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折的临床效果分析[J/OL].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(28):5423,5426.
[4]洪全明,杨可佳,沈飞,等.前、后路内固定融合术治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折的比较研究[J].创伤外科杂志,2016,18(12):708-712.
[5]田飞鹏,李春双,邵建萍.后路内固定融合术治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折临床疗效观察[J].中外医疗,2016,35(18):77-78.
[6]王朝武,杨再丰,欧常军.脊柱胸腰段骨折行后路椎弓根螺钉内固定联合植骨手术的效果分析[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2015,25(17):123-125.
[7]张建军,肖东,李金光,等.后路内固定融合术在治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折的可行性及安全性[J].医学理论与实践,2015,28(9):1135-1136.
[8]张云帆,谭志宏,贾培征,等.后路内固定融合术治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折患者应用的临床研究[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2014,35(6):837-838.
[9]何建华,冯大雄.后路内固定融合术治疗不同分型胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2016,26(7):596-601.
[10]张允帅,冯立君,林有志,等.后路内固定融合术治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折的临床效果分析[J].河南医学研究,2017,26(2):297-298.
[11]曾忠友,裴斐,张建乔,等.腰椎后路内固定融合术并发神经损伤的原因分析和处理[J].脊柱外科杂志,2016,14(2):83-86.
[12]徐双,李军,段毅,等.后路内固定融合手术治疗类风湿性寰枢椎不稳[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2017,27(4):289-295.
[13]冯彩英.后路内固定融合术治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折98例临床疗效分析[J].现代诊断与治疗,2013,24(10):2327-2328.
[2]张顺聪,李大星,袁凯,等.后路减压固定融合术治疗伴椎管侵占的骨质疏松性重度椎体骨折塌陷的疗效评价[J].广州中医药大学学报,2017,34(4):504-509.
[3]赵艳君,赵玉.后路内固定融合术治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折的临床效果分析[J/OL].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(28):5423,5426.
[4]洪全明,杨可佳,沈飞,等.前、后路内固定融合术治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折的比较研究[J].创伤外科杂志,2016,18(12):708-712.
[5]田飞鹏,李春双,邵建萍.后路内固定融合术治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折临床疗效观察[J].中外医疗,2016,35(18):77-78.
[6]王朝武,杨再丰,欧常军.脊柱胸腰段骨折行后路椎弓根螺钉内固定联合植骨手术的效果分析[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2015,25(17):123-125.
[7]张建军,肖东,李金光,等.后路内固定融合术在治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折的可行性及安全性[J].医学理论与实践,2015,28(9):1135-1136.
[8]张云帆,谭志宏,贾培征,等.后路内固定融合术治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折患者应用的临床研究[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2014,35(6):837-838.
[9]何建华,冯大雄.后路内固定融合术治疗不同分型胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2016,26(7):596-601.
[10]张允帅,冯立君,林有志,等.后路内固定融合术治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折的临床效果分析[J].河南医学研究,2017,26(2):297-298.
[11]曾忠友,裴斐,张建乔,等.腰椎后路内固定融合术并发神经损伤的原因分析和处理[J].脊柱外科杂志,2016,14(2):83-86.
[12]徐双,李军,段毅,等.后路内固定融合手术治疗类风湿性寰枢椎不稳[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2017,27(4):289-295.
[13]冯彩英.后路内固定融合术治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折98例临床疗效分析[J].现代诊断与治疗,2013,24(10):2327-2328.