自测健康评定量表评价广州市城镇居民健康状况的信效度研究
|
摘要
目的考评自测健康评定量表(SRHMS V1.0)用于广州市城镇居民的信度和效度。方法采用分层随机抽样的方法,选取广州市范围内的城镇居民共1200名进行现场测试,收回有效问卷1044份。使用SPSS20.0和AMOS21.0进行数据的分析,考察量表的内部一致性信度和分半信度,并同时使用探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析考评量表的结构效度。结果总量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.941,分半信度系数为0.883。探索性因子分析共提取9个特征值大于1的因子,与理论构想基本吻合。验证性因子分析结果显示,修正后的总量表各拟合指标分别为CMIN/df=3.452<5,GFI=0.878>0.8,IFI=0.924>0.9,TLI=0.916>0.9,CFI=0.924>0.9,RMSEA=0.049<0.05,拟合较好。结论使用SRHMS V1.0测量广州市城镇居民的健康状况是可靠的、有效的。
Objective To assess the reliability and validity of Self-rated Health Measurement Scale Version 1. 0( SRHMS V1. 0) in evaluating the health status of urban residents in Guangzhou. Methods We selected 1200 urban residents in Guangzhou for investigation by stratified random sampling method,and took back 1044 effective questionnaires. The reliability was assessed with Cronbach's α coefficient and Guttman Split – Half coefficient,the structure validity was evaluated with exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis by SPSS 20. 0 and AMOS 21. 0. Results The Cronbach's α coefficient of total scale was 0. 941 and the split-half reliability was 0. 883. Nine factors obtained from exploratory factor analysis were basically consistent with the theoretical structure of SRHMS V1. 0. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the total scale after modification has good fitting effect: CMIN/df = 3. 452 < 5,GFI = 0. 878 > 0. 8,IFI = 0. 924 > 0. 9,TLI = 0. 916 > 0. 9,CFI = 0. 924 >0. 9,RMSEA = 0. 049 < 0. 05. Conclusion SRHMS V1. 0 is reliable and valid for measuring the health status of urban residents in Guangzhou.
Objective To assess the reliability and validity of Self-rated Health Measurement Scale Version 1. 0( SRHMS V1. 0) in evaluating the health status of urban residents in Guangzhou. Methods We selected 1200 urban residents in Guangzhou for investigation by stratified random sampling method,and took back 1044 effective questionnaires. The reliability was assessed with Cronbach's α coefficient and Guttman Split – Half coefficient,the structure validity was evaluated with exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis by SPSS 20. 0 and AMOS 21. 0. Results The Cronbach's α coefficient of total scale was 0. 941 and the split-half reliability was 0. 883. Nine factors obtained from exploratory factor analysis were basically consistent with the theoretical structure of SRHMS V1. 0. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the total scale after modification has good fitting effect: CMIN/df = 3. 452 < 5,GFI = 0. 878 > 0. 8,IFI = 0. 924 > 0. 9,TLI = 0. 916 > 0. 9,CFI = 0. 924 >0. 9,RMSEA = 0. 049 < 0. 05. Conclusion SRHMS V1. 0 is reliable and valid for measuring the health status of urban residents in Guangzhou.
引文
[1]刘海燕,龙红,温波.贵阳市大学生自测健康状况及影响因素分析.中国公共卫生,2013,29(2):202-206.
[2]Lyytikainen L,Kemppainen T.Regional inequalities in self-rated health in Russia:What is the role of social and economic capital.Social Science&M edicine,2016,161:92-99.
[3]Xu J,Zhang J,Feng L,et al.Self-rated health of population in Southern China:association with socio-demographic characteristics measured with multiple-item self-rated health measurement scale.BM C Public Health,2010,10(1):393.
[4]王莹莹,张远妮,林生趣,等.亚健康评定量表应用于华南地区大学生人群中的因子分析.中国健康心理学杂志,2016,24(11):1689-1692.
[5]邢星,闵捷,陈炳为,等.江苏省居民健康生活方式与行为素养水平影响因素的通径分析.中国卫生统计,2017,34(2):243-246.
[6]周少钦,罗舒仁,黎泽明,等.南宁市医学生手机使用情况以及手机成瘾影响因素研究.中国卫生统计,2017,34(2):200-202,206.
[7]Nascimento-Ferreira MV,Collese TS,de Moraes ACF,et al.Validity and reliability of sleep time questionnaires in children and adolescents:A systematic reviewand meta-analysis.Sleep M edicine Reviews,2016,30:85-96.
[8]黄晓霞,尉敏琦,吴燕,等.基于保护动机理论的成人控烟问卷的信效度评估.现代预防医学,2016,43(16):2984-2987.
[9]Alias R,Ismail MH,Sahiddan N.A Measurement Model for Leadership Skills Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA).Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2015,172:717-724.
[10]吴伟旋,许军,吴志华,等.自测健康评定量表应用于交通警察的验证性因子分析.中国卫生统计,2016,33(03):445-447.
[11]郭英,张梦柔,谢雨菲.社会支持量表(服刑人员版)的修订及信效度研究.现代预防医学,2016,43(18):3374-3378.
[12]Chui W,Leung M.Adult attachment internal working model of self and other in Chinese culture:M easured by the Attachment Style Questionnaire—Short Form(ASQ-SF)by confirmatory factor analysis(CFA)and item response theory(IRT).Personality and Individual Differences,2016,96:55-64.
[2]Lyytikainen L,Kemppainen T.Regional inequalities in self-rated health in Russia:What is the role of social and economic capital.Social Science&M edicine,2016,161:92-99.
[3]Xu J,Zhang J,Feng L,et al.Self-rated health of population in Southern China:association with socio-demographic characteristics measured with multiple-item self-rated health measurement scale.BM C Public Health,2010,10(1):393.
[4]王莹莹,张远妮,林生趣,等.亚健康评定量表应用于华南地区大学生人群中的因子分析.中国健康心理学杂志,2016,24(11):1689-1692.
[5]邢星,闵捷,陈炳为,等.江苏省居民健康生活方式与行为素养水平影响因素的通径分析.中国卫生统计,2017,34(2):243-246.
[6]周少钦,罗舒仁,黎泽明,等.南宁市医学生手机使用情况以及手机成瘾影响因素研究.中国卫生统计,2017,34(2):200-202,206.
[7]Nascimento-Ferreira MV,Collese TS,de Moraes ACF,et al.Validity and reliability of sleep time questionnaires in children and adolescents:A systematic reviewand meta-analysis.Sleep M edicine Reviews,2016,30:85-96.
[8]黄晓霞,尉敏琦,吴燕,等.基于保护动机理论的成人控烟问卷的信效度评估.现代预防医学,2016,43(16):2984-2987.
[9]Alias R,Ismail MH,Sahiddan N.A Measurement Model for Leadership Skills Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA).Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2015,172:717-724.
[10]吴伟旋,许军,吴志华,等.自测健康评定量表应用于交通警察的验证性因子分析.中国卫生统计,2016,33(03):445-447.
[11]郭英,张梦柔,谢雨菲.社会支持量表(服刑人员版)的修订及信效度研究.现代预防医学,2016,43(18):3374-3378.
[12]Chui W,Leung M.Adult attachment internal working model of self and other in Chinese culture:M easured by the Attachment Style Questionnaire—Short Form(ASQ-SF)by confirmatory factor analysis(CFA)and item response theory(IRT).Personality and Individual Differences,2016,96:55-64.