我国5种医药大学学报在国内外数据库中高被引论文的对比分析
|
摘要
【目的】对比国内高被引论文在国外的被引情况与国外高被引论文在国内的被引情况,探讨二者的相关性,以了解国内外高被引论文的差异。【方法】选择2017年《中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版)》医药大学学报类综合评价总分排名前5位的期刊,选取2008—2017年各期刊在CNKI中的高被引论文共512篇及Wo S中高被引论文共486篇,统计分析所选文献的被引频次等相关指标。【结果】5种期刊的CNKI高被引论文的被引频次差异较小,而Wo S高被引论文的被引频次差异较大; CNKI高被引论文的被引频次远高于Wo S高被引论文的被引频次;除《南方医科大学学报》外,CNKI/Wo S高被引论文的被引频次与其在Wo S/CNKI中的被引频次的差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。【结论】我国5种国内学术影响力较高的医药大学学报的国际影响力均较低,这些期刊国内/外高被引论文的被引频次与其在国外/内的被引频次之间的相关性均不明显,国内外对5种期刊的引用存在差异。
[Purposes]In order to find the discrepancy of the highly cited articles in domestic and foreign databases,this study compares the foreign citation of the highly cited articles in domestic database and the domestic citation of the highly cited articles in foreign databases so as to explore the correlation between them. [Methods]Five journals with the highest comprehensive evaluation score in the category of medical university journals from Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports in 2017 were included,and 512 articles with the highest citation frequency in CNKI database and 486 articles in Web of Science( WoS) database from 2008 to 2017 were selected and their citation frequencies were analyzed. [Findings] There exists a small citation frequency gap among those highly cited articles for these 5 journals in CNKI database,which is more obvious in WoS database. The citation frequencies of highly cited articles in CNKI database are significantly higher than those in WoS database. Except for Journal of Southern Medical University,there exists no significant correlation( P>0.05) between the citation frequencies of highly cited articles from CNKI/WoS database and those in WoS/CNKI database. [Conclusions]The domestic influence of these 5 medical university journals in China is high,while their international influence is relatively low. Highly cited articles in domestic databases do not necessarily get highly cited in foreign databases,and vice versa. Therefore,there is a citation difference between domestic and foreign databases.
[Purposes]In order to find the discrepancy of the highly cited articles in domestic and foreign databases,this study compares the foreign citation of the highly cited articles in domestic database and the domestic citation of the highly cited articles in foreign databases so as to explore the correlation between them. [Methods]Five journals with the highest comprehensive evaluation score in the category of medical university journals from Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports in 2017 were included,and 512 articles with the highest citation frequency in CNKI database and 486 articles in Web of Science( WoS) database from 2008 to 2017 were selected and their citation frequencies were analyzed. [Findings] There exists a small citation frequency gap among those highly cited articles for these 5 journals in CNKI database,which is more obvious in WoS database. The citation frequencies of highly cited articles in CNKI database are significantly higher than those in WoS database. Except for Journal of Southern Medical University,there exists no significant correlation( P>0.05) between the citation frequencies of highly cited articles from CNKI/WoS database and those in WoS/CNKI database. [Conclusions]The domestic influence of these 5 medical university journals in China is high,while their international influence is relatively low. Highly cited articles in domestic databases do not necessarily get highly cited in foreign databases,and vice versa. Therefore,there is a citation difference between domestic and foreign databases.
引文
[1]韩维栋,薛秦芬,王丽珍.挖掘高被引论文有利于提高科技期刊的学术影响力[J].中国科技期刊研究,2010,21(4):514-518.
[2]王维朗,游滨,张苹,等.科技期刊高被引论文对编辑工作的启示[J].编辑学报,2016,28(6):572-574.
[3]张美慧. 2010—2014年国内外光学研究的高被引文章比较[J].科技与出版,2015(10):102-105.
[4]倪明,闫雷,陆瑶,等.基于Wo S和CSCD的肿瘤类高被引文章分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(12):1311-1318.
[5]陈汐敏,丁贵鹏,接雅俐,等.国内外临床医学高被引论文来源期刊的差异及思考[J].科技与出版,2015(4):92-96.
[6]陈汐敏,丁贵鹏,接雅俐,等.国内外临床医学高被引论文的对比分析及启示[J].预防医学情报杂志,2015,31(10):837-843.
[7]韩玺,史昱天.四种国内情报学核心期刊的国际影响力对比研究——基于Web of Science数据库的统计分析[J].情报杂志,2017,36(7):144-148,143.
[8]莫愚,王旭,谢秋红,等.由Web of Science数据库分析高影响力中华医学会系列期刊引发的思考[J].编辑学报,2015,27(4):405-408.
[9]尚利娜,牛晓勇,刘改换.基于Wo S引文检索的煤矿开采类期刊国际影响力提升策略思考[J].编辑学报,2017,29(5):463-466.
[10]方红玲.我国科技期刊论文被引量和下载量峰值年代——多学科比较研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2011,22(5):708-710.
[11]顾萍,谢志耘.医学文献检索[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2013:90-91.
[12]伍军红,肖宏.中国科技期刊的国际影响力统计分析[J].编辑学报,2013,25(5):507-510.
[13]刘筱敏,马娜.中国科协科技期刊国际影响力分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(3):335-339.
[14]刘小燕.高校科技期刊的发展路径思考——基于5届高校精品科技期刊的统计分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(3):286-291.
[15]刘群,孙昌朋,王谦,等.入选PubMed数据库对提升医学期刊国际影响力的作用[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(12):1344-1347.
[16]丁佐奇,张伟,郑晓南.江苏省国际品牌学术期刊研究与启示[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(10):906-912.
[2]王维朗,游滨,张苹,等.科技期刊高被引论文对编辑工作的启示[J].编辑学报,2016,28(6):572-574.
[3]张美慧. 2010—2014年国内外光学研究的高被引文章比较[J].科技与出版,2015(10):102-105.
[4]倪明,闫雷,陆瑶,等.基于Wo S和CSCD的肿瘤类高被引文章分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(12):1311-1318.
[5]陈汐敏,丁贵鹏,接雅俐,等.国内外临床医学高被引论文来源期刊的差异及思考[J].科技与出版,2015(4):92-96.
[6]陈汐敏,丁贵鹏,接雅俐,等.国内外临床医学高被引论文的对比分析及启示[J].预防医学情报杂志,2015,31(10):837-843.
[7]韩玺,史昱天.四种国内情报学核心期刊的国际影响力对比研究——基于Web of Science数据库的统计分析[J].情报杂志,2017,36(7):144-148,143.
[8]莫愚,王旭,谢秋红,等.由Web of Science数据库分析高影响力中华医学会系列期刊引发的思考[J].编辑学报,2015,27(4):405-408.
[9]尚利娜,牛晓勇,刘改换.基于Wo S引文检索的煤矿开采类期刊国际影响力提升策略思考[J].编辑学报,2017,29(5):463-466.
[10]方红玲.我国科技期刊论文被引量和下载量峰值年代——多学科比较研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2011,22(5):708-710.
[11]顾萍,谢志耘.医学文献检索[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2013:90-91.
[12]伍军红,肖宏.中国科技期刊的国际影响力统计分析[J].编辑学报,2013,25(5):507-510.
[13]刘筱敏,马娜.中国科协科技期刊国际影响力分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(3):335-339.
[14]刘小燕.高校科技期刊的发展路径思考——基于5届高校精品科技期刊的统计分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(3):286-291.
[15]刘群,孙昌朋,王谦,等.入选PubMed数据库对提升医学期刊国际影响力的作用[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(12):1344-1347.
[16]丁佐奇,张伟,郑晓南.江苏省国际品牌学术期刊研究与启示[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(10):906-912.