摘要
目的:研究对比磷酸酸蚀牙釉质与牙本质前后,Rely X U200自粘接树脂水门汀对Vita MarkⅡ陶瓷与牙的粘接强度。方法:分别制备20个牙釉质块(A组)和20个牙本质块(B组),各组随机分成2组;制备40个瓷块,随机分成4小组;从各组中随机抽取一小组样本表面用磷酸酸蚀(A_(EH)组和B_(DH)组),另外一小组不酸蚀(A_E组和B_D组),用Rely X U200将各小组牙块与Vita MarkⅡ陶瓷进行粘接,测量其剪切强度,体视显微镜观察其断裂界面。结果:A_(EH)组和A_E组的剪切强度(MPa)分别为22.20±2.85和12.37±2.98(P<0.05),界面破坏分别为1例和5例,混合破坏分别为9例和5例;B_(DH)组和B_D组的剪切强度分别为7.30±2.43和10.71±2.02,界面破坏分别是8例和7例,混合破坏分别为2例和3例。结论:表面酸蚀可增强自粘接树脂水门汀与釉质的粘接强度,降低牙本质的粘接强度。牙釉质界面破坏主要为混合破坏,牙本质界面主要为粘接界面破坏。
Objective:To compare the shear strengths of Vita Mark II ceramic blocks bonded to enamel and dentin with and without etching respectively by self-adhesive resin cement of Rely X U200.Methods:20 enamel slices(group A)and 20 dentin slices(group B)were respectively divided into 2 groups.10 slices of each group were etched by phosphoric acid,then 40 Vita Mark II ceramic blocks were respectively bonded to the slices,the sample were grouped into A_E(without etching),A_(EH)(with etching),B_D(without etching)and B_(DH)(with etching),shear strength of the samples was measured and the failure types were evaluated after debonding.Results:The shear strength(MPa)of group A_(EH)and A_Ewas 22.20±2.85 and 12.37±2.98(P<0.05),that of group B_(DH)and B_D7.30±2.43 and 10.71±2.02(P<0.05),respectively.Tooth-adhesive interfacial failure was observed in 5,1,7 and 8,mixed failure in 5,9,3 and 2 cases of group A_E,A_(EH),B_Dand B_(DH)respectively.Conclusion:Acid etching for enamel bond to ceramic by selfadhesive resin cement Rely X U200 may increase the bonding strength.Mixed failure is the main type of debonding,that for dentine may decrease the bonding strength and interface failure in the main type of debonding
引文
[1]刘一帆,郑秀丽,马瑞,等.数字化制造技术在口腔修复中的应用[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2017,33(2):277-282.
[2]王雷.后牙根管治疗后椅旁即刻全瓷修复全瓷嵌体高嵌体的微创修复[J].中国药物与临床,2015,15(1):130-131.
[3]李蓉,蒋滔,王贻宁,等.Cerec CAD/CAM全瓷嵌体和高嵌体3年临床研究[J].口腔医学研究,2005,21(6):664-666.
[4]Sadowsky SJ.An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations:A review of the literature[J].J Prosthet Dent,2006,96(6):433-442.
[5]Bindl A,Lüthy H,M9rmann WH.Thin-wall ceramic CAD/CAM crown copings:Strength and fracture pattern[J].J Oral Rehabil,2006,33(7):520-528.
[6]Della Bona A,Anusavice KJ,Mecholsky JJ Jr.Failure analysis of resin composite bonded to ceramic[J].Dent Mater,2003,19(8):693-699.
[7]Della Bona A,Northeast SE.Shear bond strength of resin bonded ceramic after different try-in procedures[J].J Dent,1994,22(2):103-107.
[8]De Muncka J,Vargas M,Van Landuyt K,et al.Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin[J].Dent Mater,2004,20(10):963-971.
[9]Hikita K,Van Meerbeek B,De Munck J,et al.Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin[J].Dent Mater,2007,23(1):71-80.
[10]WANG Linhu,XU Haixing,LI Songyang,et al.Bonding efficacy of a self-adhesive resin cement to enamel and dentin[J].武汉理工大学学报:材料科学英文版.2014,29(6):1307-1312.
[11]Baader K,Hiller KA,Buchalla W,et al.Self-adhesive luting of partial ceramic crowns:Selective enamel etching leads to higher survival after 6.5 Years in vivo.[J].J Adhesive Dent,2015,18(1):69.
[12]Federlin M,Hiller KA,Schmalz G.Effect of selective enamel etching on clinical performance of CAD/CAM partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement.[J].Clin Oral Investig,2014,18(8):1975-1984.
[13]宣桂红,王海花.酸蚀对自黏结树脂水门汀与牙本质黏结强度的影响[J].上海口腔医学,2015,24(3):302-306.
[14]Sekhri S,Mittal S,Garg S.Tensile bond strength of self adhesive resin cement after various surface treatment of enamel.[J].J Clin Diagn Res,2016,10(1):ZC01-04.
[15]张晓燕,吴凤鸣.Er:YAG激光和酸蚀预处理对自粘接树脂水门汀粘接强度的影响[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2015,35(5):732-736.