墙板与框架梁柱间连接方式对结构抗震性能的影响
|
摘要
墙板与框架梁柱连接方式多种多样,通过对2榀采用不同连接方式的框架-墙板结构缩尺模型进行水平推覆试验,观察其受力变形破坏全过程,研究不同连接方式对结构抗震性能的影响。研究表明,在柱顶水平位移逐渐增大的过程中,两种不同连接方式填充墙的斜撑作用机制均随着墙板的错动、开裂、破坏或平面外偏转而发生变化,相应地,框架梁柱的内力分布发生动态变化,但是两者也呈现出明显的差异。采用图集给出的卡件连接方式时,加载前期墙板与梁柱之间可发生相对位移,该阶段墙板对结构整体刚度贡献相对较小,但L形卡件的设置能够对墙体平面外的位移起到约束作用,直到结构整体失效,墙体始终参与抵抗水平荷载直至出现对角斜拉裂缝;采用企业现行安装工艺进行连接时,拉结钢筋的设置使得轻质墙板与主体框架从受力之始即具有较好的整体性,加载前期对结构的抗侧刚度和抗侧承载力具有较大贡献,但后期因墙板发生平面外偏转而退出工作。
Wallboard and frame beam-column connections are diverse. The pushover test was conducted on 2 pieces of scaling models of frame-wallboard structures with different connection modes to observe the whole process of mechanical deformation and failure, and the effect of different connection modes on seismic performance of structures was studied. The results show that in the process of increasing horizontal displacement at the top of columns, the bracing mechanism of the infilled walls with two different connection modes changes with the dislocation, cracking, failure or out-of-plane deflection of the wallboards. Correspondingly, the internal force distribution of the frame beams and columns changes dynamically, but there are also obvious differences between the two modes. Relative displacement may occur between wallboard and beam-column in the early stage of loading when using the card component connection method given in the code. In this stage, the contribution of wallboard to the overall stiffness of the structure is relatively small, but the setting of L-shaped card component can restrict the out-of-plane displacement of the wall until the whole structure fails, and the wall always participates in resisting horizontal load until diagonal tension cracks appear. When using the current installation technology in enterprises, the setting of tied reinforcing bars makes the light wallboard and the main frame have a better integrity from the beginning of the stress. The pre loading period contributes greatly to the lateral stiffness and the lateral bearing capacity of the structure, but later the wallboard withdraws from work because of the out-of-plane deflection of the wallboard.
Wallboard and frame beam-column connections are diverse. The pushover test was conducted on 2 pieces of scaling models of frame-wallboard structures with different connection modes to observe the whole process of mechanical deformation and failure, and the effect of different connection modes on seismic performance of structures was studied. The results show that in the process of increasing horizontal displacement at the top of columns, the bracing mechanism of the infilled walls with two different connection modes changes with the dislocation, cracking, failure or out-of-plane deflection of the wallboards. Correspondingly, the internal force distribution of the frame beams and columns changes dynamically, but there are also obvious differences between the two modes. Relative displacement may occur between wallboard and beam-column in the early stage of loading when using the card component connection method given in the code. In this stage, the contribution of wallboard to the overall stiffness of the structure is relatively small, but the setting of L-shaped card component can restrict the out-of-plane displacement of the wall until the whole structure fails, and the wall always participates in resisting horizontal load until diagonal tension cracks appear. When using the current installation technology in enterprises, the setting of tied reinforcing bars makes the light wallboard and the main frame have a better integrity from the beginning of the stress. The pre loading period contributes greatly to the lateral stiffness and the lateral bearing capacity of the structure, but later the wallboard withdraws from work because of the out-of-plane deflection of the wallboard.
引文
[1] ABDEL-HAFEZ L M,ABOUELEZZ A E Y,ELZEFEARY F.Behavior of masonry strengthened infilled reinforced concrete frames under in-plane load [J].HBRC Journal,2015,11(2):213-223.
[2] 刘翔.考虑填充墙影响的RC框架结构的抗震性能分析[D].长沙:湖南大学,2012.
[3] 叶列平,曲哲,马千里,等.从汶川地震中框架结构震害谈“强柱弱梁”屈服机制的实现[J].建筑结构,2008,38 (11):52-59.
[4] 郁彦.日本建筑的墙板连接构造[J].建筑技术,1978,8(3):51-54.
[5] 姚谦峰,张旭峰,魏晓.新型节能复合墙体保温性能及连接构造研究[J].工业建筑,2007,37(9):69-72.
[6] 夏军武,谢伟,骆泽新.内嵌墙板对框架抗震性能影响的试验研究[J].华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,40(5):89-92.
[7] 王静峰,李响,龚旭东,等.带轻质墙板钢管混凝土框架的低周反复荷载试验研究[C]// 全国防震减灾工程学术研讨会暨纪念汶川地震五周年学术研讨会.成都,2013.
[8] 方明霁,李国强.轻质外墙板和砌块墙的抗震特性对比研究[J].建筑结构,2008,38(5):55-58.
[9] 陆天佐,王曙光,杜东升,等.外保温叠合填充墙板框架结构振动台试验研究[J].建筑结构,2015,45(4):73-77.
[10] OZSAYIN B,YILMAZ E,ISPIR M,et al.Characteristics of CFRP retrofitted hollow brick infill walls of reinforced concrete frames[J].Construction & Building Materials,2011,25(10):4017-4024.
[11] RICARDO P.Performance evaluation of masonry-inflled RC frames under cyclic loading based on damage mechanic [J].Engineering Structures,2005,27(8):1278-1288.
[12] 建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
[13] 混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50010—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
[14] 中国建筑科学研究院.建筑抗震试验方法规程:JTJ/T 101—2015[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
[2] 刘翔.考虑填充墙影响的RC框架结构的抗震性能分析[D].长沙:湖南大学,2012.
[3] 叶列平,曲哲,马千里,等.从汶川地震中框架结构震害谈“强柱弱梁”屈服机制的实现[J].建筑结构,2008,38 (11):52-59.
[4] 郁彦.日本建筑的墙板连接构造[J].建筑技术,1978,8(3):51-54.
[5] 姚谦峰,张旭峰,魏晓.新型节能复合墙体保温性能及连接构造研究[J].工业建筑,2007,37(9):69-72.
[6] 夏军武,谢伟,骆泽新.内嵌墙板对框架抗震性能影响的试验研究[J].华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,40(5):89-92.
[7] 王静峰,李响,龚旭东,等.带轻质墙板钢管混凝土框架的低周反复荷载试验研究[C]// 全国防震减灾工程学术研讨会暨纪念汶川地震五周年学术研讨会.成都,2013.
[8] 方明霁,李国强.轻质外墙板和砌块墙的抗震特性对比研究[J].建筑结构,2008,38(5):55-58.
[9] 陆天佐,王曙光,杜东升,等.外保温叠合填充墙板框架结构振动台试验研究[J].建筑结构,2015,45(4):73-77.
[10] OZSAYIN B,YILMAZ E,ISPIR M,et al.Characteristics of CFRP retrofitted hollow brick infill walls of reinforced concrete frames[J].Construction & Building Materials,2011,25(10):4017-4024.
[11] RICARDO P.Performance evaluation of masonry-inflled RC frames under cyclic loading based on damage mechanic [J].Engineering Structures,2005,27(8):1278-1288.
[12] 建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
[13] 混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50010—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
[14] 中国建筑科学研究院.建筑抗震试验方法规程:JTJ/T 101—2015[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.