论交通肇事罪中的自首问题
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:On the Problem of Surrender in the Crime of Traffic Accident
  • 作者:向铭
  • 英文作者:XIANG Ming;School of Criminal Justice,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law;
  • 关键词:交通肇事罪 ; 自首 ; 争议 ; 认定依据
  • 英文关键词:traffic accident crime;;surrender;;dispute;;basis of determination
  • 中文刊名:LYGJ
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Lianyungang Normal College
  • 机构:中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-25
  • 出版单位:连云港师范高等专科学校学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.36;No.126
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:LYGJ201902007
  • 页数:5
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:32-1618/G4
  • 分类号:29-33
摘要
由于交通肇事罪认定具有复杂性,在刑法理论和司法实践中,交通肇事罪能否适用自首规定及如何适用自首规定的争论长期存在。文章从《刑法》分则的所有罪名都适用总则的规定出发,认为行为人只要"自动投案,如实供述",就应该被认定为自首,并对交通肇事罪自首的具体适用提出建议:交通肇事后"在现场等候抓捕"不宜都被认定为"自动投案";交通肇事后履行救助义务而未报警应该具体问题具体分析;交通肇事后逃逸不应完全被排除在适用自首制度之外。
        Due to the complexity of the crime of traffic accidents,the dispute over whether surrender can be applied and how to apply in the crime of traffic accidents has always existed in the theory of criminal law and judicial practice.The article deems that all the offence in the Criminal Law are subject to the general provisions,and believes that the perpetrator should be deemed to be surrendering as long as one "automatically surrenders and truthfully confesses".It puts forward suggestions for the specific application of the crime of traffic accidents:afterwards "waiting for arrest at the scene" should not be regarded as"automatic case";after the implementation of the obligation of assistance without warning,the specific problem should be analyzed in detail;the escape after traffic accident should not be completely excluded from adapting to the surrender system.
引文
[1]梁健.从胡斌案谈交通肇事案件中的自首认定及量刑[J].人民司法,2009(20):15-17.
    [2]程婷,陈祺.交通肇事罪中自首的认定[J].山西省政法管理干部学院学报,2013(1):110-112.
    [3]李芳.交通肇事罪若干问题研究[J].佳木斯职业学院学报,2017(8):147-148.
    [4]张明楷.论交通肇事罪的自首[J].清华法学,2010(3):27-41.
    [5]李智.交通肇事罪中自首的认定[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2014(1):92-95,110.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700