不同植被过滤带对农田径流泥沙和氮磷拦截效果与途径
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Interception Ways and Effects of Grass Filter Strips on Sediment,Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Agricultural Runoff
  • 作者:李晓娜 ; 张国芳 ; 武美军 ; 杨可伟 ; 史瑞双
  • 英文作者:LI Xiaona;ZHANG Guofang;WU Meijun;YANG Kewei;SHI Ruishuang;Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences,Beijing Research &Development Center for Grass and Environment;
  • 关键词:农业面源污染 ; 氮磷流失 ; 植被过滤带 ; 拦截率
  • 英文关键词:agricultural non-point source pollution;;nitrogen and phosphorus loss;;vegetation filter strip;;interception rate
  • 中文刊名:TRQS
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
  • 机构:北京市农林科学院北京草业与环境研究发展中心;
  • 出版日期:2017-06-15
  • 出版单位:水土保持学报
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.31;No.150
  • 基金:公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201503106);; 北京市农林科学院科技创新能力建设专项(KJCX20161502-1);北京市农林科学院院级科技创新团队(TNKYT201605)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:TRQS201703007
  • 页数:7
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:61-1362/TV
  • 分类号:42-47+53
摘要
在我国农业面源污染已经成为水环境质量恶化和湖泊富营养化的重要原因,其中氮磷对地表水富营养化的贡献超过了50%。通过浑水冲刷试验,研究了3种禾本科植被过滤带((黑麦草Lolium perenne Linn.)、偃麦草((京草2号)Elytrigia repens(L.)Nevski)、无芒雀麦(Bromus inermis Leyss.)对径流、泥沙以及氮磷的拦截效果,同时分析了3种植被过滤带拦截氮磷的主要途径。结果表明:(1)与裸地相比,3种植被过滤带均能显著提高径流与氮磷的拦截率。3种植被过滤带之间对径流、氮磷拦截率没有显著差异。黑麦草过滤带泥沙流失量显著低于无芒雀麦过滤带;同时径流、泥沙与氮磷拦截率之间存在显著正相关关系,表明植被对径流和泥沙的拦截一定程度上决定对氮磷的拦截量;(2)径流过程中磷的流失量均低于氮的流失量。氮的流失主要以溶解态氮为主,占总氮流失量的90%以上;磷的流失则主要以颗粒态磷为主;(3)植被过滤带拦截氮磷的途径不同,氮主要通过增加土壤入渗的途径来拦截,磷则主要通过植物茎秆基部进行物理拦截;(4)京草2号对氮的拦截效果优于黑麦草和无芒雀麦,而黑麦草则在磷的拦截方面表现突出。因此在植被过滤带的优化设计方面可以考虑黑麦草与京草2号2者混播以达到最佳的拦截吸附效果。
        In China,agricultural non-point source pollution has become an important reason for water environmental deterioration and lake eutrophication,with the contribution of nitrogen and phosphorus to the eutrophication of surface water being more than 50%.This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of herbaceous grass filter strips established by perennial ryegrass(Lolium perenne Linn),Jingcao No.2(Elytrigia repens(L.)Nevski)and smooth bromegrass(Bromus inermis Leyss.)on the interception of runoff,sediment,nitrogen,and phosphorus in a simulated experiment in soil boxes with runoff generators.The results showed that:(1)The runoff,nitrogen,and phosphorus loss on the plot were significantly reduced by the three types grass filter strips.The sediment loss of ryegrass filter strip was significantly less than that of Jincao No.2and smooth bromegrass.The result of correlation analysis showed that the nitrogen,phosphorus interception rate was significantly correlated with the runoff,and sediment interception rate.(2)The loss of phosphorus in four kinds of treatments were lower than that of nitrogen,with more than 90%of nitrogen being lost in dissolved nitrogen,and phosphorus being mainly lost in particulate phosphorus.(3)Nitrogen was mainly intercepted by soil infiltration,and phosphorus was mainly intercepted by plant stem.(4)The nitrogen loss of Jingcao No.2filter strip was less than that of ryegrass and smooth bromegrass filter strip,and the phosphorus loss of ryegrass filter strip was less than that of Jingcao No.2and smooth bromegrass filter strip.Therefore,in order to improve the interception of nitrogen and phosphorus,ryegrass and Jingcao No.2can be planted in a mixing way when building the herbaceous filter strips.
引文
[1]中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[EB/OL].[2016-10-20].http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2012/indexch.htm.
    [2]中华人民共和国水利部.中国水土保持公报[EB/OL].[2016-10-20].http://www.mwr.gov.cn/zwzc/hygb/zgstbcgb/200902/U020160627481119687233.pdf.
    [3]袁金柱,李利华.我国农业面源污染对水体的影响及防治措施[J].内蒙古农业科技,2009(1):29-31.
    [4]黄欠如,章新亮,李清平,等.香根草篱防治红壤坡耕地侵蚀效果的研究[J].江西农业学报,2001,13(2):40-44.
    [5]范洪杰,黄欠如,秦江涛,等.稻草覆盖和草篱对红壤缓坡旱地水土流失及作物产量的影响[J].土壤,2014,46(3):550-554.
    [6]许峰,蔡强国,吴淑安,等.高植物篱控制紫色土坡耕地侵蚀的特点[J].土壤学报,2002,39(1):71-80.
    [7]Cao L X,Zhang Y G,Lu H Z.Grass hedge effects on controlling soil loss from concentrated flow:A case study in the red soil region of China[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2015,148(5):97-105.
    [8]许开平,吴家森,黄程鹏,等.不同植物篱在减少雷竹林氮磷渗漏流失中的作用[J].土壤学报,2012,49(5):980-987.
    [9]Shiono T,Yamamoto N,Haraguchi N.Performance of grass strips for sediment control in Okinawa[J].JaroJapan Agricultural Research Quarterly,2007,41(4):291-297.
    [10]Castelle A J,Johnson A W,Conolly C.Wetlands and stream buffer size requirements-a review[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,1994,23(5):878-882.
    [11]Abu-Zreig M,Ruda R P,Whiteley H R,et al.Phosphorus removal in vegetated filter strips[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2003,32(2):613-619.
    [12]国家环境保护总局,国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB3838-2002,地表水环境质量标准[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002:1-6.
    [13]申小波,陈传胜,张章,等.不同宽度模拟植被过滤带对农田径流、泥沙以及氮磷的拦截效果[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(4):721-729.
    [14]喻定芳,戴全厚,王庆海,等.北京地区等高草篱防治坡耕地水土及氮磷流失效果研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(6):11-15.
    [15]Shiono T,Yamamoto N,Haraguchi N.Performance of grass strips for sediment control in Okinawa[J].Jaro-Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly,2007,41(4):291-297.
    [16]Qwens P N,Duzant J H,Deeks L K.Evaluation of contrasting buffer within an agricultural landscape for reducing sediment and sediment-associated phosphorus delivery to surface waters[J].Soil Use and Management,2007,23(S1):165-175.
    [17]肖波,王慧芳,王庆海,等.坡耕地上等高草篱的功能与效益综合分析[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(7):1318-1329.
    [18]Julien F,Benoit T,Daniel G,et al.Biomass carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus stocks in hybrid poplar buffers,herbaceous buffers and natural woodlots in the riparian zone on agricultural land[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2015,154(5):333-345.
    [19]郭雨华,赵廷宁,孙保平,等.草地坡面水动力学特性及其阻延地表径流机制研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(4):264-267.
    [20]Pansak W,Hilger T H,Dercon G,et al.Changes in the relationship between soil erosion and N loss pathways after establishing soil conservation systems in uplands of Northeast Thailand[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2008,128(3):167-176.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700