全球气候治理INDC制度发展及我国应对方略
|
摘要
INDC制度是国际气候治理的发展趋势。其与"共同但有区别责任原则"具有内在关联,后者是前者的理论及制度基础,前者是贯彻后者的新途径。《巴黎协定》对该制度的全面确立,标志着国际气候治理从"硬法"之治转向"硬法"与"软法"共治,从国际与国内"分离"之治转向国际、国内"协同"之治,从"自上而下"之治转向总目标控制下的"自下而上"之治。随着"塔拉诺阿对话"及"实施细则"相关谈判的深入,INDC制度的约束力及可操作性将不断提升。为此,我国应在对内与对外两个层面予以积极应对。
引文
[1]Luke Grunbaum,From Kyoto to Paris:How bottom-up regulation could revitalize the UNFCCC,Georgetown Environmental Law Review Online,November 30,2015.
[2]Sandrine Maljean-Dubois,Thomas Spencer,Matthieu Wemaere,The Legal Form of the Paris Climate Agreement:a Comprehensive Assessment of Options,Carbon&Climate Law Review,2015.
[3]Rafael Leal-Arcas,Luigi Carafa,Road to Paris COP21:Towards Soft Global Governance for Climate Change?Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review,2014.
[4]杨兴.试论国际环境法的共同但有区别的责任原则[J].时代法学,2003(1).
[5]Decision 2/CP.18 Advancing the Durban Platform,UN Doc,FCCC/CP/2012/8/Add.1,28 February,2013.
[6]Santa Barbara Declaration of Environmental Rights,Annals of American,Encyclopedia,Inc.,1976,Vol.19,p.100-101.
[7]边永民.论共同但有区别的责任原则在国际环境法中的地位[J].暨南大学(哲学社会科学版),2007(4).
[8]Luke Grunbaum,From Kyoto to Paris:How bottom-up regulation could revitalize the UNFCCC,Georgetown Environmental Law Review Online,November 30,2015.
[9]Andrew Schatz,Lima climate negotiations shed light on a future climate framework,ABA Trends July/August,2015.
[10]王绍武.京都议定书的执行情况[J].气候变化研究进展,2013(1)
[11]UN Environment(UNEP).The Emissions Gap Report2017:A UN Environment Synthesis Report(UNEP2017),http://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/22070/EGR_2017.Pdf.accessed 15 October,2017.
[12].强化应对气候变化行动---中国INDC[EB/OL].中国政府网,2017-10-02.
[13]习近平.携手构建合作共赢、公平合理的气候变化治理机制---在气候变化巴黎大会开幕式上的讲话[EB/OL].http://www.xinhuanet.com/world/2015-12/01/c_1117309642.htm,2016-01-15.
[2]Sandrine Maljean-Dubois,Thomas Spencer,Matthieu Wemaere,The Legal Form of the Paris Climate Agreement:a Comprehensive Assessment of Options,Carbon&Climate Law Review,2015.
[3]Rafael Leal-Arcas,Luigi Carafa,Road to Paris COP21:Towards Soft Global Governance for Climate Change?Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review,2014.
[4]杨兴.试论国际环境法的共同但有区别的责任原则[J].时代法学,2003(1).
[5]Decision 2/CP.18 Advancing the Durban Platform,UN Doc,FCCC/CP/2012/8/Add.1,28 February,2013.
[6]Santa Barbara Declaration of Environmental Rights,Annals of American,Encyclopedia,Inc.,1976,Vol.19,p.100-101.
[7]边永民.论共同但有区别的责任原则在国际环境法中的地位[J].暨南大学(哲学社会科学版),2007(4).
[8]Luke Grunbaum,From Kyoto to Paris:How bottom-up regulation could revitalize the UNFCCC,Georgetown Environmental Law Review Online,November 30,2015.
[9]Andrew Schatz,Lima climate negotiations shed light on a future climate framework,ABA Trends July/August,2015.
[10]王绍武.京都议定书的执行情况[J].气候变化研究进展,2013(1)
[11]UN Environment(UNEP).The Emissions Gap Report2017:A UN Environment Synthesis Report(UNEP2017),http://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/22070/EGR_2017.Pdf.accessed 15 October,2017.
[12].强化应对气候变化行动---中国INDC[EB/OL].中国政府网,2017-10-02.
[13]习近平.携手构建合作共赢、公平合理的气候变化治理机制---在气候变化巴黎大会开幕式上的讲话[EB/OL].http://www.xinhuanet.com/world/2015-12/01/c_1117309642.htm,2016-01-15.