释清华简《尹至》“汝告我夏隐率若■(诗)”之“■(诗)”
|
摘要
"汝告我夏隐率若■"之■的本字是"寺",此几无疑义。李学勤将"寺"进一步释为"时",可以认为是目前对这个字最有代表性的释读。廖名春曾提出应释为"诗",但未得到主流认可。其实,这个字释为"诗"更为妥当。一佐以"时"说的漏洞,二佐以俞樾释读《吕氏春秋》之"诗"时的论述,三佐以李学勤等对清华简《金滕》"诗"的释读和"寺""志"字形的比较,四佐以诗学源头概念,可以得出"■释为‘诗’比释为‘时’更合适"这一结论。
There is little doubt that the original character in the sentence■"Were the pains of Xia you told mereally■?"means 寺(sì).Li Xueqin further interpreted 寺(sì)into 时 (shí),considered to be the most representative interpretation of the word.Liao Mingchun put forward the interpretation of 诗(shī),but not recognized by the mainstream.In fact,it is more appropriate to interpret the word as诗(shī).One is the loophole in interpretation of时(shí),the other is Yu Yue’s exposition of 诗(shī)while decoding LüShi Chun Qiu,and the third is the comparison between Li Xueqin’s decoding 诗(shī)in Tsinghua bamboo slip Jin Teng and the zigzag of 诗(shī) and 志 (zhì).The fourth is the concept of poetics source,to be concluded that it is more appropriate to interpret■ as 诗 (shī) than 时(shí).
There is little doubt that the original character in the sentence■"Were the pains of Xia you told mereally■?"means 寺(sì).Li Xueqin further interpreted 寺(sì)into 时 (shí),considered to be the most representative interpretation of the word.Liao Mingchun put forward the interpretation of 诗(shī),but not recognized by the mainstream.In fact,it is more appropriate to interpret the word as诗(shī).One is the loophole in interpretation of时(shí),the other is Yu Yue’s exposition of 诗(shī)while decoding LüShi Chun Qiu,and the third is the comparison between Li Xueqin’s decoding 诗(shī)in Tsinghua bamboo slip Jin Teng and the zigzag of 诗(shī) and 志 (zhì).The fourth is the concept of poetics source,to be concluded that it is more appropriate to interpret■ as 诗 (shī) than 时(shí).
引文
[1]清华大学出土文献研究与保护中心.清华大学藏战国竹简[M].上海:中西书局,2010.
[2]廖名春.清华简与《尚书》研究[J].文史哲,2010(6):120-125.
[3]俞林波.二重证据法:出土文献与传世文献的互证———清华简《尹至》与《吕氏春秋》研究[C]//蔡先金,张兵.出土文献与中国文学研究:第三届出土文献与中国文学研究学术研讨会(国际)论文集.济南:齐鲁书社,2013.
[4]十三经注疏[M].清嘉庆刊本.阮元,校刻.北京:中华书局,2009.
[5]高享.诗经今注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2009.
[6]李学勤,刘国忠.走近清华简[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2011.
[7]郭庆藩.新编诸子集成:庄子集释[M].王孝鱼,点校.北京:中华书局,2012.
[8]许维遹,梁运华.吕氏春秋集释[M].北京:中华书局,2009.
[9]华学诚,郭锡良.文献语言学:第八辑汉字古音表稿专辑[M].北京:中华书局,2018.
[10]江苏省贫下中农协会,江苏人民出版社.江苏农民诗歌选[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,1975.
[11]楚系简帛文字[EB/OL].[2018-10-05].http://www.guoxuedashi.com/zixing/zhanguo/12175wm.
[12]楚系简帛文字[EB/OL].[2018-10-05].http://www.guoxuedashi.com/zixing/zhanguo/10212cb/
[13]许慎.说文解字注[M].段玉裁,注.杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2006.
[2]廖名春.清华简与《尚书》研究[J].文史哲,2010(6):120-125.
[3]俞林波.二重证据法:出土文献与传世文献的互证———清华简《尹至》与《吕氏春秋》研究[C]//蔡先金,张兵.出土文献与中国文学研究:第三届出土文献与中国文学研究学术研讨会(国际)论文集.济南:齐鲁书社,2013.
[4]十三经注疏[M].清嘉庆刊本.阮元,校刻.北京:中华书局,2009.
[5]高享.诗经今注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2009.
[6]李学勤,刘国忠.走近清华简[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2011.
[7]郭庆藩.新编诸子集成:庄子集释[M].王孝鱼,点校.北京:中华书局,2012.
[8]许维遹,梁运华.吕氏春秋集释[M].北京:中华书局,2009.
[9]华学诚,郭锡良.文献语言学:第八辑汉字古音表稿专辑[M].北京:中华书局,2018.
[10]江苏省贫下中农协会,江苏人民出版社.江苏农民诗歌选[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,1975.
[11]楚系简帛文字[EB/OL].[2018-10-05].http://www.guoxuedashi.com/zixing/zhanguo/12175wm.
[12]楚系简帛文字[EB/OL].[2018-10-05].http://www.guoxuedashi.com/zixing/zhanguo/10212cb/
[13]许慎.说文解字注[M].段玉裁,注.杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2006.