摘要
文章选取世界银行发布的物流绩效指数(LPI),对中国与中亚五国的物流绩效做出对比分析。研究发现,中亚五国与中国物流绩效水平相比差距比较大,中国在物流准时性和物流基础设施方面比较好,在海关效率方面比较落后,中亚五国在国际货运能力和物流准时性方面比较好,在物流基础设施和海关效率方面比较落后。最后对提升中国与中亚五国的物流绩效水平提出相应的建议。
This paper selects the logistics performance index(LPI) released by the World Bank to compare the logistics performance index and its sub-indicators between China and the five Central Asian countries. The study found that the gap between the five Central Asian countries and China's logistics performance level is relatively large. China is better at timeliness and infrastructure, but it lags behind in customs efficiency. The five Central Asian countries are relatively well developed in terms of international shipments and timeliness, but they lag behind in terms of infrastructure and customs. Finally, it puts forward corresponding suggestions for improving the logistics performance level of China and five Central Asian countries.
引文
[1]张红丽,刘芳.丝绸之路经济带国际物流绩效对新疆进出口贸易影响研究[J].石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,32(1):19-26.
[2]王东方,董千里,于立新.“一带一路”沿线国家和地区物流绩效与中国对外贸易潜力[J].中国流通经济,2018,32(2):17-27.
[3]王建伟,马姣姣.中国与“一带一路”沿线东南亚国家跨境物流协作——基于物流绩效指数(LPI)[J].长安大学学报(社会科学版),2017,19(4):56-63.
[4]郭苏文,李丽丽.制度质量、物流绩效与双边贸易——海陆丝绸之路国家的比较[J].价格月刊,2018(18):46-51.
[5]刘洋,殷宝庆.国际物流绩效的贸易效应分析[J].中国流通经济,2017,31(10):28-36.
[6]艾赛提江,郭羽诞.中亚五国贸易便利化程度分析[J].新疆社会科学,2012(4):75-80.
[7] Jhawar A, Garg S K, Khera S N. Analysis of the skilled work force effect on the logistics performance index——case study from India[J]. Logistics Research, 2014,7(1):117.
[8]Cemberci M, Civelek M E, Canbolat N. The Moderator Effect of Global Competitiveness Index on Dimensions of Logistics Performance Index[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015,195:1514-1524.