干旱河谷10种生态恢复树种的光合和水分生理特征研究
|
摘要
通过对岷江上游干旱河谷10种生态恢复树种盆栽苗木的光合、荧光以及水分生理特征等的比较,分析了不同植物在干旱地区的光合运作情况以及光合生理特征和水分生理特征,及其间的相关关系,揭示了各类植物的抗旱特征,以期为干旱河谷区植被恢复树种材料的选择提供理论依据。
In order to provide theoretical basis of tree selection for vegetation restoration, 10 tree species were chosen for measuring and comparing their photosynthetic, Chlorophyll fluorescence and water physiological characteristics in the dry valley of the Minjiang River. The result revealed the drought resistance characteristics of various plants by analyzing the photosynthetic operation, photosynthetic physiological characteristics, water physiological characteristics and correlations of different plants in arid regions.
In order to provide theoretical basis of tree selection for vegetation restoration, 10 tree species were chosen for measuring and comparing their photosynthetic, Chlorophyll fluorescence and water physiological characteristics in the dry valley of the Minjiang River. The result revealed the drought resistance characteristics of various plants by analyzing the photosynthetic operation, photosynthetic physiological characteristics, water physiological characteristics and correlations of different plants in arid regions.
引文
[1] 郑杰,冯文兰,王凤杰,等.岷江上游干旱河谷范围的界定及其变化分析[J].干旱区地理,2017(03):541～548.
[2] 庞学勇,包维楷,吴宁.岷江上游干旱河谷气候特征及成因[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008(S1):46～53.
[3] 包维楷等著.干旱河谷生态恢复与持续管理的科学基础[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.710.
[4] 王会儒,陈国鹏,王飞,等.干旱河谷植物生态适应与植被恢复[J].西北林学院学报,2015(05):60～67.
[5] 王仁卿,藤原一绘,尤海梅.森林植被恢复的理论和实践:用乡土树种重建当地森林——宫胁森林重建法介绍[J].植物生态学报,2002(S1):133～139.
[6] 杨育林,鄢武先,尤继勇,等.川西干旱河谷区植被恢复机理及模式分析[J].西南民族大学学报(自然科学版),2016,42(6):604～609.
[7] 蔡海霞,吴福忠,杨万勤.模拟干旱胁迫对岷江干旱河谷—山地森林交错带4种乡土植物抗氧化酶系统的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2010(04):478～482.
[8] 何建社,张利,刘千里,等.岷江干旱河谷区典型灌木对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应[J].生态学报,2018(07):2362～2371.
[9] 黎燕琼,刘兴良,郑绍伟,等.岷江上游干旱河谷四种灌木的抗旱生理动态变化[J].生态学报,2007(03):870～878.
[10] 申学圣,宫渊波,陈林武,等.岷江上游干旱河谷4个乡土树种的抗旱生理指标主成分分析[J].贵州林业科技,2012(04):1～6.
[11] Zhu L,van de Peppel A,Li X,Welander M.Changes of leaf water potential and endogenous cytokinins in young apple trees treated with or without paclobutrazol under drought conditions.SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM,2004(NO.2):133～141.
[12] 王海珍,韩路,徐雅丽,等.土壤水分梯度对灰胡杨光合作用与抗逆性的影响[J].生态学报,2017(02):432～442.
[13] Farquhar G D,Sharkey T D.Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis.Annual review of plant physiology,1982,33(1):317～345.
[14] 段爱国,张建国,张俊佩,何彩云.干热河谷主要植被恢复树种水分利用效率动态分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2010(06):13～19.
[15] 蔡海霞,吴福忠,杨万勤.干旱胁迫对高山柳和沙棘幼苗光合生理特征的影响[J].生态学报,2011(09):2430～2436.
[16] Massacci A,Nabiev S M,Pietrosanti L,et al.Response of the photosynthetic apparatus of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to the onset of drought stress under field conditions studied by gas-exchange analysis and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging.PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH,2008,46(2):189～195.
[17] 高洁,曹坤芳,王焕校,等.干热河谷主要造林树种光合作用光抑制的防御机制[J].应用与环境生物学报,2004(03):286～291.
[18] 刘雷震,武建军,周洪奎,等.叶绿素荧光及其在水分胁迫监测中的研究进展[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2017(09):2780～2787.
[19] 姚春娟,郭圣茂,马英超,等.干旱胁迫对4种决明属植物光合作用和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].草业科学,2017,34(9):1880～1888.
[20] 张曦,王振南,陆姣云,等.紫花苜蓿叶性状对干旱的阶段性响应[J].生态学报,2016(09):2669～2676.
[2] 庞学勇,包维楷,吴宁.岷江上游干旱河谷气候特征及成因[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008(S1):46～53.
[3] 包维楷等著.干旱河谷生态恢复与持续管理的科学基础[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.710.
[4] 王会儒,陈国鹏,王飞,等.干旱河谷植物生态适应与植被恢复[J].西北林学院学报,2015(05):60～67.
[5] 王仁卿,藤原一绘,尤海梅.森林植被恢复的理论和实践:用乡土树种重建当地森林——宫胁森林重建法介绍[J].植物生态学报,2002(S1):133～139.
[6] 杨育林,鄢武先,尤继勇,等.川西干旱河谷区植被恢复机理及模式分析[J].西南民族大学学报(自然科学版),2016,42(6):604～609.
[7] 蔡海霞,吴福忠,杨万勤.模拟干旱胁迫对岷江干旱河谷—山地森林交错带4种乡土植物抗氧化酶系统的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2010(04):478～482.
[8] 何建社,张利,刘千里,等.岷江干旱河谷区典型灌木对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应[J].生态学报,2018(07):2362～2371.
[9] 黎燕琼,刘兴良,郑绍伟,等.岷江上游干旱河谷四种灌木的抗旱生理动态变化[J].生态学报,2007(03):870～878.
[10] 申学圣,宫渊波,陈林武,等.岷江上游干旱河谷4个乡土树种的抗旱生理指标主成分分析[J].贵州林业科技,2012(04):1～6.
[11] Zhu L,van de Peppel A,Li X,Welander M.Changes of leaf water potential and endogenous cytokinins in young apple trees treated with or without paclobutrazol under drought conditions.SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM,2004(NO.2):133～141.
[12] 王海珍,韩路,徐雅丽,等.土壤水分梯度对灰胡杨光合作用与抗逆性的影响[J].生态学报,2017(02):432～442.
[13] Farquhar G D,Sharkey T D.Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis.Annual review of plant physiology,1982,33(1):317～345.
[14] 段爱国,张建国,张俊佩,何彩云.干热河谷主要植被恢复树种水分利用效率动态分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2010(06):13～19.
[15] 蔡海霞,吴福忠,杨万勤.干旱胁迫对高山柳和沙棘幼苗光合生理特征的影响[J].生态学报,2011(09):2430～2436.
[16] Massacci A,Nabiev S M,Pietrosanti L,et al.Response of the photosynthetic apparatus of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to the onset of drought stress under field conditions studied by gas-exchange analysis and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging.PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH,2008,46(2):189～195.
[17] 高洁,曹坤芳,王焕校,等.干热河谷主要造林树种光合作用光抑制的防御机制[J].应用与环境生物学报,2004(03):286～291.
[18] 刘雷震,武建军,周洪奎,等.叶绿素荧光及其在水分胁迫监测中的研究进展[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2017(09):2780～2787.
[19] 姚春娟,郭圣茂,马英超,等.干旱胁迫对4种决明属植物光合作用和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].草业科学,2017,34(9):1880～1888.
[20] 张曦,王振南,陆姣云,等.紫花苜蓿叶性状对干旱的阶段性响应[J].生态学报,2016(09):2669～2676.