家庭禀赋、环境感知与农民沙化土地治理满意度——基于甘肃省14县市农户调查数据
|
摘要
以甘肃省606份农户调查数据为研究样本,采用有序Logit模型分析了家庭禀赋、环境感知及控制变量对农民沙化土地治理满意度的影响。结果表明:农民对沙化土地治理持较为满意态度,其中参与治理的实验组农民沙化土地治理满意度明显高于未参与治理的对照组农民,这一结论通过对比回归得到印证。实验组农民沙化土地治理满意度受政府补贴和社会保障的影响大,家庭禀赋与对照组农民差异没有通过显著检验。环境感知与农民沙化土地治理满意度具有高度相关性,但实验组农民更关注周边植被覆盖度变化,对照组农民更关注绿洲保护功能。家庭禀赋、环境感知对农民沙化土地治理满意度的影响存在性别、教育程度、家庭结构的差异。沙化土地保护政策不应仅局限于沙化土地逆转,更应注重基于农民满意度的家庭福利改善。
Taking survey data of 606 households from Gansu province as samples,this paper used a ordered Logit model to analyze how family endowments,environment perception and other variables affect farmer's satisfaction on desertification land control. Our findings indicate that farmers are more satisfied with desertification land management.while,farmer's satisfaction come from experience group in control areas whose satisfaction about desertification land control are higher than those come from contrastive group in non-control areas,this conclusion is confirmed by comparative regression. Government subsidy and social security have a greater impact on farmer's satisfaction about desertification land control in the experimental group,however the family endowment and the control group did not pass a significant test. Environmental perception is highly correlated with farmer's satisfaction about desertification land control,but the farmers in the experimental group pay more attention to coverage change of surrounding vegetation,while the contrastive group concerned about protection function of oasis. There is difference between sex,education and difference family structure as refer to the influence of family endowments,environment perception on farmers' satisfaction about desertification land control. Finally,this paper put forward desertification land control policy not only aim to desertification land reversed,but also more attention to the improvement of family welfare based on farmers' satisfaction.
Taking survey data of 606 households from Gansu province as samples,this paper used a ordered Logit model to analyze how family endowments,environment perception and other variables affect farmer's satisfaction on desertification land control. Our findings indicate that farmers are more satisfied with desertification land management.while,farmer's satisfaction come from experience group in control areas whose satisfaction about desertification land control are higher than those come from contrastive group in non-control areas,this conclusion is confirmed by comparative regression. Government subsidy and social security have a greater impact on farmer's satisfaction about desertification land control in the experimental group,however the family endowment and the control group did not pass a significant test. Environmental perception is highly correlated with farmer's satisfaction about desertification land control,but the farmers in the experimental group pay more attention to coverage change of surrounding vegetation,while the contrastive group concerned about protection function of oasis. There is difference between sex,education and difference family structure as refer to the influence of family endowments,environment perception on farmers' satisfaction about desertification land control. Finally,this paper put forward desertification land control policy not only aim to desertification land reversed,but also more attention to the improvement of family welfare based on farmers' satisfaction.
引文
[1]国家林业局.全国第五次荒漠化防治报告[R].北京:国家林业局,2015.
[2]甘肃省林业厅.甘肃省第五次荒漠化和沙化监测情况公报[R].兰州:甘肃省林业厅,2016.
[3]丁明军,郑林,聂勇.鄱阳湖沙山地区沙化土地特征及成因分析[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(2):159-163.
[4]国家林业局.国家沙化土地封禁保护区管理办法[EB/OL].http://sjy. forestry. gov. cn/portal/sjy/s/3639/content-771472.html.
[5]韦惠兰,周夏伟.封禁保护区农户对沙化土地治理的认知度及影响因素实证分析——基于甘肃省659个农户调查数据的对比研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(7):33-37.
[6] Awrence R H,Liang J.Structural integration of the affect balance scale and the life satisfaction index A:race,sex,and age differences[J].Psychology and Aging,1988(3):375-384.
[7] Lucas R E,Donnellan M B.Estimating the reliability of single-item life satisfaction measures:results from four national panel studies[J].Social Indicators Research,2012,105:323-331.
[8] Kozak M,Rimmington M. Tourist satisfaction with Mallorca,Spain,as an off-season holiday destination[J].Journal of Travel Research,2000,38(3):260-269.
[9] Robin N,Dogan Gursoy.Residents'support for tourism:an identity perspective[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,2012,39(1):243-268.
[10]李瑞,吴殿廷,殷红梅,等.民族村寨旅游地居民满意度影响机理模型与实证——以社区、政府和企业力量导向模式的比较研究[J].地理学报,2016,71(8):1416-1435.
[11]赵雪雁,毛笑文.西部民族地区农户的生活满意度分析——基于甘肃省的村域调查数据[J].农业经济问题,2014,35(5):49-54.
[12]王丽佳,刘兴元.牧民对草地生态补偿政策的满意度实证研究[J].生态学报,2017,37(17):5798-5806.
[13]孙传谆,甄霖,王超,等.天然林资源保护一期工程生态成效评估——以甘肃小陇山地区为例[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(6):732-740.
[14]王昌海.中国自然保护区给予周边社区了什么?——基于1998~2014年陕西、四川和甘肃三省农户调查数据[J].管理世界,2017(3):63-75.
[15]徐宇阳,郑林,王盼盼,等.南方沙化土地治理中的农户行为实证研究——以鄱阳湖滨沙区为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(3):441-448.
[16]湛东升,孟斌,张文忠.北京市居民居住满意度感知与行为意向研究[J].地理研究,2014,33(2):336-348.
[17]邢权兴,孙虎,管滨,等.基于模糊综合评价法的西安市免费公园游客满意度评价[J].资源科学,2014,36(8):1645-1651.
[18]谢晋,蔡银莺.创新实践地区农户参与农田保护补偿政策成效的生计禀赋影响——苏州及成都的实证比较[J].资源科学,2016,38(11):2082-2094.
[19]赵雪雁,刘春芳,王学良,等.干旱区内陆河流域农户生计对生态退化的脆弱性评价——以石羊河中下游为例[J].生态学报,2016,36(13):4141-4151.
[2]甘肃省林业厅.甘肃省第五次荒漠化和沙化监测情况公报[R].兰州:甘肃省林业厅,2016.
[3]丁明军,郑林,聂勇.鄱阳湖沙山地区沙化土地特征及成因分析[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(2):159-163.
[4]国家林业局.国家沙化土地封禁保护区管理办法[EB/OL].http://sjy. forestry. gov. cn/portal/sjy/s/3639/content-771472.html.
[5]韦惠兰,周夏伟.封禁保护区农户对沙化土地治理的认知度及影响因素实证分析——基于甘肃省659个农户调查数据的对比研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(7):33-37.
[6] Awrence R H,Liang J.Structural integration of the affect balance scale and the life satisfaction index A:race,sex,and age differences[J].Psychology and Aging,1988(3):375-384.
[7] Lucas R E,Donnellan M B.Estimating the reliability of single-item life satisfaction measures:results from four national panel studies[J].Social Indicators Research,2012,105:323-331.
[8] Kozak M,Rimmington M. Tourist satisfaction with Mallorca,Spain,as an off-season holiday destination[J].Journal of Travel Research,2000,38(3):260-269.
[9] Robin N,Dogan Gursoy.Residents'support for tourism:an identity perspective[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,2012,39(1):243-268.
[10]李瑞,吴殿廷,殷红梅,等.民族村寨旅游地居民满意度影响机理模型与实证——以社区、政府和企业力量导向模式的比较研究[J].地理学报,2016,71(8):1416-1435.
[11]赵雪雁,毛笑文.西部民族地区农户的生活满意度分析——基于甘肃省的村域调查数据[J].农业经济问题,2014,35(5):49-54.
[12]王丽佳,刘兴元.牧民对草地生态补偿政策的满意度实证研究[J].生态学报,2017,37(17):5798-5806.
[13]孙传谆,甄霖,王超,等.天然林资源保护一期工程生态成效评估——以甘肃小陇山地区为例[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(6):732-740.
[14]王昌海.中国自然保护区给予周边社区了什么?——基于1998~2014年陕西、四川和甘肃三省农户调查数据[J].管理世界,2017(3):63-75.
[15]徐宇阳,郑林,王盼盼,等.南方沙化土地治理中的农户行为实证研究——以鄱阳湖滨沙区为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(3):441-448.
[16]湛东升,孟斌,张文忠.北京市居民居住满意度感知与行为意向研究[J].地理研究,2014,33(2):336-348.
[17]邢权兴,孙虎,管滨,等.基于模糊综合评价法的西安市免费公园游客满意度评价[J].资源科学,2014,36(8):1645-1651.
[18]谢晋,蔡银莺.创新实践地区农户参与农田保护补偿政策成效的生计禀赋影响——苏州及成都的实证比较[J].资源科学,2016,38(11):2082-2094.
[19]赵雪雁,刘春芳,王学良,等.干旱区内陆河流域农户生计对生态退化的脆弱性评价——以石羊河中下游为例[J].生态学报,2016,36(13):4141-4151.