第三方组织参与社区规划的协作机制研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The Coordination Mechanism Of Third-party Organization In Community Planning
  • 作者:袁媛 ; 刘懿莹 ; 蒋珊红
  • 英文作者:Yuan Yuan;Liu Yiying;Jiang Shanhong;
  • 关键词:第三方组织 ; 协作规划 ; 协作机制 ; 社区规划
  • 英文关键词:Third-party organizations;;Collaborative planning;;Collaborative mechanism;;Community planning
  • 中文刊名:GHSI
  • 英文刊名:Planners
  • 机构:中山大学地理科学与规划学院广东省城市化与地理环境空间模拟重点实验室;中山大学城市化研究院;中山大学地理科学与规划学院;深圳市城市规划设计研究院;
  • 出版日期:2018-02-01
  • 出版单位:规划师
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.34;No.266
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(51678577);; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(15lgjc38);; 广东省科技创新青年拔尖人才项目
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GHSI201802004
  • 页数:7
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:45-1210/TU
  • 分类号:14-20
摘要
在规划转型的背景下,多元主体协作式参与成为中国社区规划探讨的热点。由于社区类型多样、现实问题复杂,规划师沟通技能有待提升,社区规划有必要引入第三方组织承担协作功能。文章在梳理国内外相关研究的基础上,构建了第三方组织参与社区规划的协作机制;归纳出基于多元力量的监督组织、基于社区—企业共建的自治组织和基于乡贤能人的权威组织3种典型协作模式,并总结其在实践中的适用性与优缺点,表明第三方组织的加入有利于促进多元主体参与规划,提高协作规划效率,有效引导各方主体达成共识,并且对规划实施过程进行有效监督。
        In the context of planning transformation, collaborative participation with multi-stakeholders has become a hot topic in community planning. Owing to the complex problems and various types of community and the limitation of planners' communication skills, third-party organization need to be brought into community planning. By reviewing the research at home and abroad, the paper builds the coordination mechanism of third-party organization in community planning, summarizes three typical patterns: the supervisory organization based on multi-stakeholders, the autonomous organization based on community-enterprises cooperation, and the squire organization based on rural elites. Then, the paper analyzes their applicability, advantages and disadvantages.the research shows that third-party organization is help for improving the efficiency of collaborative planning, and supervising the implementation of planning.
引文
[1]Habermas J.The Theory of Communicative Action:Lifeworld and System—A Critique of Functionalist Reason[M].Boston:Beacon Press,1987.
    [2]Healey P.Building Institutional Capacity through Collaborative Approaches to Urban Planning[J].Environment and Planning A,1998(9):1 531-1 546.
    [3]Healey P.Collaborative Planning:Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies[M].London:Palgrave,1997.
    [4]Evans B,Joas M,Sundback S,et al.Governing Sustainable Cities[M].London:Earthscan,2005.
    [5]Prins E.Framing a Conflict in a Community-university Partnership[J].Journal of Planning Education and Research,2005(1):57-74.
    [6]Zegras C,Rayle L.Testing the Rhetoric:An Approach to Assess Scenario Planning's Role as a Catalyst for Urban Policy Integration[J].Futures,2012(4):303-318.
    [7]Mc Donald C,Kirk-Brown A,Frost L,et al.Partnerships and Integrated Responses to Rural Decline:The Role of Collective Efficacy and Political Capital in Northwest Tasmania,Australia[J].Journal of Rural Studies,2013(32):346-356.
    [8]Ross M G,Lappin,Ben W.Community Organization:Theory,Principles,and Practice[M].New York:Harper&Row,1967.
    [9]Roy P.Non-profit and Communitybased Green Space Production in Milwaukee:Maintaining a Counterweight within Neo-liberal Urban Environmental Governance[J].Space&Polity,2011(2):87-105.
    [10]Bajracharya B,Khan S.Evolving Governance Model for Community Building:Collaborative Partnerships in Master Planned Communities[J].Urban Policy and Research,2010(4):471-485.
    [11]Reggers A,Grabowski S,Wearing SL,et al.Exploring Outcomes of Community-based Tourism on the Kokoda Track,Papua New Guinea:A Longitudinal Study of Participatory Rural Appraisal Techniques[J].Journal of Sustainable Tourism,2016(8-9):1 139-1 155.
    [12]Butler W H.Expanding the Scope and Impact of Collaborative Planning[J].Journal of the American Planning Association,2009(2):238-249.
    [13]Reardon K M,Green R,Bates L K.Overcoming the Challenges of Postdisaster Planning in New Orleans Lessons from the ACORN Housing/University Collaborative[J].Journal of Planning Education and Research,2009(3):391-400.
    [14]Raciti A,Lambert-Pennington K A,Reardon K M.The Struggle for the Future of Public Housing in Memphis,Tennessee:Reflections on HUD's Choice Neighborhoods Planning Program[J].Cities,2015(57):6-13.
    [15]Taylor M.Communities in the Lead:Power,Organisational Capacity and Social Capital[J].Urban Studies,2000(5-6):1 019-1 035.
    [16]Hu Y,Roo G D,Lu B.‘Communicative Turn’in Chinese Spatial Planning?Exploring Possibilities in Chinese Contexts[J].Cities,2013(35):42-50.
    [17]袁媛,蒋珊红,刘菁.国外沟通和协作式规划近15年研究进展——基于CitespaceⅢ软件的可视化分析[J].现代城市研究,2016(12):42-50.
    [18]李东泉.从公共政策视角看1960年代以来西方规划理论的演进[J].城市发展研究,2013(6):36-42.
    [19]王丰龙,陈倩敏,许艳艳,等.沟通式规划理论的简介,批判与借鉴[J].国际城市规划,2012(6):82-90.
    [20]曹康,王晖.从工具理性到交往理性—现代城市规划思想内核与理论的变迁[J].城市规划,2009(9):44-51.
    [21]姜梅,姜涛.“规划中的沟通”与“作为沟通的规划”—当代西方沟通规划理论概述[J].城市规划学刊,2008(2):31-38.
    [22]于立.规划理论的批判和规划效能评估原则[J].国外城市规划,2005(4):34-40.
    [23]龙元.交往型规划与公众参与[J].城市规划,2004(1):73-78.
    [24]曹轶,魏建平.沟通式规划理论在新时期村庄规划中的应用探索[J].规划师,2010(增刊2):229-232.
    [25]马向明,吕晓蓓.区域绿地:从概念到实践—一次“协作式规划”的探索[J].城市规划,2006(11):46-50.
    [26]Cheng Y.Collaborative Planning in the Network:Consensus Seeking in Urban Planning Issues on the Internet—the Case of China[J].Planning Theory,2013(4):351-368.
    [27]袁媛,陈金城.低收入社区的规划协作机制研究—以广州市同德街规划为例[J].城市规划学刊,2015(1):46-53.
    [28]吴祖泉.解析第三方在城市规划公众参与的作用—以广州市恩宁路事件为例[J].城市规划,2014(2):62-68,75.
    [29]黄耀福,郎嵬,陈婷婷,等.共同缔造工作坊:参与式社区规划的新模式[J].规划师,2015(10):38-42.
    [30]袁媛,杨贵庆,张京祥,等.社区规划师:技术员or协调员[J].城市规划,2014(11):30-36.
    [31]王婷婷,张京祥.略论基于国家—社会关系的中国社区规划师制度[J].上海城市规划,2010(5):4-9.
    [32]Goldstein B E,Butler W H.Expanding the Scope and Impact of Collaborative Planning[J].Journal of the American Planning Association,2010(2):238-249.
    (1)官方文本用“同德街”,居民均口称“同德围”,“围”指石墙包围的传统村落,用以防御邻近仇敌、盗寇和猛兽,常见于广东南部,住在村落里的多是一个家族。本文“同德围”和“同德街”所指区域相同。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700