摘要
贪污受贿罪法定刑的并行配置有损对受贿罪所侵害的法益的保护,受贿罪的法定刑应当独立配置,不能完全以刑事政策为导向与贪污罪的法定刑并用。受贿罪与贪污罪所侵害的法益、行为方式、行为客体、主观心态等方面均不相同,其社会危害性亦不同。运用定性分析方法,提出应以社会危害性为基准,从情节、量刑起点和量刑幅度三个方面各自设定不同的法定刑,使受贿罪法定刑独立配置,以更加符合现代法治国家的基本理念、原则,从而更有利于科学合理量刑。
The parallel allocation of statutory punishment of corruption and bribery is harmful to the protection of the legal interests of bribery,and the statutory punishment of bribery should be independently arranged,the legal punishment of the crime of criminal policy and the crime of embezzlement can not be completely used. The two parties have different legal interests,behavior patterns,behavior objects and subjective mentality,and their social harmfulness is also different. Therefore,use the method of qualitative analysis,propose that it should be based on social harmfulness as the benchmark,set different legal punishmentto make the legal punishment independent of the crime of bribery in accordance with the basic concepts and principles of the modern rule of law.
引文
[1]梁根林.贪污受贿定罪量刑标准的立法完善[J].中国法律评论,2015(2):162-167.
[2]姜涛.贪污受贿犯罪的法定刑应当区分[J].政治与法律,2016(10):38-51.
[3]袁登明,罗翔.刑法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2014:155.