摘要
【目的/意义】学术实体合作关系评估对于科技管理者整合创新资源、提高创新效率,科研人员发现潜在合作对象具有很强的现实意义。【方法/过程】本文以合著科技文献数量作为关键评价指标,利用作者、研究机构、国家三类实体间的合作关系建立多层合作关系网络,提出支持同层级和跨层级实体间合作范围和合作强度的测度方法。【结果/结论】对我国双一流高校国际合作情况进行实证,验证了测度模型的有效性。
【Purpose/significance】The evaluation of cooperation between academic entities is of great practical significance to integrate innovative resources and improve innovation efficiency for scientific & technological managers and to find potential cooperators for researchers.【Method/process】This paper uses the number of co-authored scientific literatures as the key evaluation index. A heterogeneous relationship network model of academic entity is proposed by analyzingco-authorship and co-operation relationship among academic entities: authors、research institutions or countries. Based onthe model, the scope and the density of cooperation between the same level and different level entities can be calculated.【Result/conclusion】An empirical study on the international cooperation of China's double world-classes universities isconducted to verify the validity of the measurement model.
引文
1李纲,魏旻予,毛进,郑彬彬.基于合著网络的城市间科研合作特征研究—以计算机领域核心期刊为例[J].情报学报,2014,33(10):1067-1076.
2 侯元元,夏勇其,刘彤,吕华侨.基于期刊论文和专利文献的多层科研合作关系网络研究[J].情报学报,2014,33(10):1057-1066.
3 Abbasi A, Hossain L, Uddin S, et al. Evolutionary dynamics of scientific collaboration networks multi-levels and cross-time analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2011,(89):687-710.
4 GlennH.Petry. A statistical Analysis of Worldwide Coauthorship Relationships in Scholarly Journals of Business[J].Journal of Economics and Business,1988, 2(40):169-176.
5 V Pislyakov, E Shukshina.Measuring excellence in Russia:Highly cited papers, leading institutions, patterns of national and international collaboration[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2014, 65(11):2321–2330
6 岳晓旭,袁军鹏,潘云涛,石淑香.中国国际科技合作主导地位变迁和效度分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(1):3-13.
7 刘蓓,袁毅, BOUTIN Eric.社会网络分析法在论文合作网中的应用研究[J].情报学报, 2008, 27(3):407-417.
8 Koseoglu M. Mapping the institutional collaboration network of strategic management research:1980-2014[J].Scientometrics,2016,109(1):1-24.
9 Hoekman J, Frenken K, Tijssen R J W. Research collaboration at a distance:Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe[J]. Research Policy, 2010,39(5):662-673.
10 Kostoff R N. Comparison of China/USA science andtechnology performance[J]. Informetrics, 2008,2(4):354-363.
11 Kostoff R N. China S&T assessment[J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems,2009,24(4):71-74.