防震视角下综合管廊韧性评价体系
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Evaluation System of the Resilience of Utility Tunnel Under the Perspective of Earthquake Prevention
  • 作者:石振武 ; 谭宪宇 ; 刘洁
  • 英文作者:SHI Zhen-wu;TAN Xian-yu;LIU Jie;School of Civil Engineering,Northeast Forestry University;
  • 关键词:综合管廊 ; 韧性评价 ; 防震 ; 德尔菲法 ; 层次分析法
  • 英文关键词:utility tunnel;;resilience evaluation;;earthquake prevention;;Delphi method;;analytic hierarchy process
  • 中文刊名:WHCJ
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
  • 机构:东北林业大学土木工程学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-15
  • 出版单位:土木工程与管理学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.36
  • 基金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2572018BJ12);; 国家自然科学基金(71601042;71603062);; 教育部人文社会科学青年基金(16YJC630071;16YJC630040);; 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2016M60140)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:WHCJ201903004
  • 页数:8
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:42-1816/TU
  • 分类号:23-30
摘要
综合管廊是城市基础设施现代化的重要标志,其防震性能受到各界的重视。基于此,为了对综合管廊防震性能进行量化研究,同时也为给综合管廊设计部门以及政府规划部门提供科学的设计依据和独特的规划视角,本文结合韧性概念提出了防震视角下综合管廊韧性评价方法。该方法基于防震视角,以韧性的四个基本特征为切入点,将德尔菲法和层次分析法相结合,对韧性指标体系及其权重进行确定,建立了防震视角下综合管廊韧性评价体系。并将该评价体系应用到哈尔滨市综合管廊工程项目实例中,结果表明:哈尔滨市哈东路段综合管廊韧性表现优异;综合管廊的防震性能可以通过建立韧性指标评价体系的方法加以量化研究;韧性思维在综合管廊建设领域是适用的。
        Utility tunnel is an important symbol of the modernization of urban infrastructure,and its earthquake prevention performance has been concerned by all circles. Based on this,in order to quantitatively study the earthquake prevention performance of the utility tunnel,and to provide scientific design basis and unique planning perspective for the utility tunnel design department and the government planning department,this paper proposes an evaluation method of the resilience of the utility tunnel under the perspective of earthquake prevention in combination with the concept of resilience. The method is based on the perspective of earthquake prevention to take the four basic characteristics as the breakthrough point,combines Delphi method with AHP to determine resilience index system and its weight and to establish the utility tunnel resilience evaluation system under the perspective of earthquake prevention. The evaluation system is applied to Harbin utility tunnel project,and the results show that the resilience of the Hadong Road section of Harbin utility tunnel performance is excellent, the earthquake prevention performance of the utility tunnel can be quantitatively studied by establishing the method of resilience index evaluation system,and the resilience thinking is applicable in the field of utility tunnel construction.
引文
[1] Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1973,4:1-23.
    [2] Timmerman P. Vulnerability,Resilience and the Collapse of Society:a Review of Models and Possible Climatic Applications[R]. Toronto,Canada:Institute for Environmental Studies,University of Toronto,1981.
    [3] Pimm S L. The complexity and stability of ecosystems[J]. Nature,1984,307:321-326.
    [4] Berkes F,Folke C. Linking Social and Ecological Systems for Resilience and Sustainability[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1998.
    [5] Bruneau M,Chang S E,Eguchi R T,et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J]. Earthq Spectra,2003,19(4):733-752.
    [6] Gunderson L H. Adaptive Dancing:Interactions Between Social Resilience and Ecological Crises[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003.
    [7] Ouyang M,Duenas-Osorio L,Min X. A three-stage resilienceanalysis framework for urban infrastructure systems[J]. Structural Safety,2012,36-37:23-31.
    [8] Francis R,Bekera B. A metric and frameworks for resilienceanalysis of engineered and infrastructure systems[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2014,121:90-103.
    [9] Turnquist M,Vugrin E. Design for resilience in Infrastructure distribution networks[J]. Environment Systems and Decisions,2013,33:104-120.
    [10]赵旭东,陈志龙,蔡浩,等.城市关键基础设施体系毁伤恢复力评估方法研究[J].兵工学报,2016,37(s1):101-108.
    [11]郭小东,苏经宇,王志涛.韧性理论视角下的城市安全减灾[J].上海城市规划,2016,(1):41-44.
    [12]唐桂娟.城市灾害恢复力指标体系的构建与综合评价[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,16(2):31-37.
    [13]李亚,翟国方.我国城市灾害韧性评估及其提升策略研究[J].规划师,2017,33(8):5-11.
    [14]王峤,臧鑫宇.韧性理念下的山地城市公共空间生态设计策略[J].风景园林,2017,(4):50-56.
    [15]郑艳,林陈贞.韧性城市的理论基础与评估方法[J].城市,2017,(6):22-28.
    [16]李杨,张亮.智能城市系统恢复力评价体系及区域差异研究[J].科技创新导报,2011,(11):33-35.
    [17]孙云章.城市地下管线综合管廊项目建设中的决策支持研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2008.
    [18]刘述虹.典型综合管廊体系地震响应分析[D].哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所,2016.
    [19]国办发〔2015〕61号,国务院办公厅关于推进城市地下综合管廊建设的指导意见[S].
    [20] Buckle P,Marsh G,Smale S. Assessing Resilience and Vulner Ability:Principles,Strateg Ies and Actions[M]//Gonsalves J,Mohan J. Strengthening Resilience in Post-disaster Situations. International Development Research Centre,Australia,2001:245-253.
    [21] Mustafa D. Reinforcing vulnerability? Disaster relief,recovery,and response to the 2001 flood in Rawalpindi,Pakistan[J]. Global Environmental Change Part B:Environmental Hazards,2003,5(2):71-82.
    [22] Paton D,Millar M,Johnston D. Community resilience to volcanic hazard consequences[J]. Natural Hazards,2001,24:157-169.
    [23]孙鸿鹄,程先富,陈翼翔,等.区域洪涝灾害恢复力时空演变研究——以巢湖流域为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(9):1384-1394.
    [24]杨雅婷.抗震防灾视角下城市韧性社区评价体系及优化策略研究[D].北京:北京工业大学,2016.
    [25]王少娜,董瑞,谢晖,等.德尔菲法及其构建指标体系的应用进展[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2016,41(5):695-698.
    [26] GB 18306-2015,中国地震动参数区划图[S].

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700