2011—2016年神农架流域综合治理效益评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Benefit evaluation of Shennongjia watershed comprehensive management in 2011—2016
  • 作者:曾智
  • 英文作者:ZENG Zhi;School of Economics,Yangtze University;
  • 关键词:治理效益 ; 层次分析法 ; 模糊综合评价法 ; 神农架流域
  • 英文关键词:governance benefit;;analytic hierarchy process;;fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method;;Shennongjia watershed
  • 中文刊名:HBNY
  • 英文刊名:Hubei Agricultural Sciences
  • 机构:长江大学经济学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-10
  • 出版单位:湖北农业科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.58;No.628
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HBNY201907029
  • 页数:5
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:42-1255/S
  • 分类号:129-133
摘要
为提高神农架流域生态环境和社会经济效益,以神农架林区香溪河、南河、堵河、沿渡河流域为研究对象,结合国家统计局数据、文献历史数据、调查访问数据,运用层次分析法构建神农架流域综合治理效益评价指标体系,并以模糊综合评价法构建评价模型,对比分析神农架流域治理工作实施前和实施6年后林区防洪减灾、水保生态、经济和社会效益变化的响应。结果表明,治理工作实施6年来神农架流域综合治理效益评价等级为"良好",综合治理效益增长率为5.82%,其中防洪减灾、社会效益增长率分别为3.23%和3.48%,治理效率较低,说明长三角流域生态环境修复是一个百年工程,不能一蹴而就;神农架林区水保生态效益和经济效益十分显著,增长率分别为4.70%和4.56%,说明神农架林区生态经济效益增长较快。在此基础上提出了推动长江流域生态环境修复和神农架林区生态经济可持续发展的政策建议。
        In order to improve the ecological environment and social and economic benefits of Shennongjia River Basin, the Xiangxi River, Nanhe River, Duhe River and Yandu River Basin in Shennongjia Forest Area are taken as research objects,combined with the data of the National Bureau of Statistics, historical data of the literature, and survey access data, the analytic hierarchy process is used to construct the evaluation index system of the comprehensive management of Shennongjia watershed, and the evaluation model is constructed by the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. The response of water conservation ecological, economic and social benefits to the Shennongjia watershed management work before and after the implementation of the forest disaster prevention and mitigation are compared and analyzed. The results show that the evaluation level of comprehensive management benefits of Shennongjia River Basin in the past 6 years has been "good"; and the growth rate of comprehensive management benefits is 5.82%, of which the ecological growth rates of disaster prevention and social are 3.23% and 3.48%, respectively. The low efficiency of treatment indicates that the ecological environment restoration in the Yangtze River Delta is a century-long project, which cannot be achieved overnight; the mitigation and water conservation and economic benefits of the agricultural forest area are very significant, with growth rates of 4.70% and 4.56%, respectively, indicating that the ecological economic benefits of Shennongjia forest area are growing fast. On this basis, the policy recommendations for promoting the restoration of the ecological environment in the Yangtze River Basin and the sustainable development of the ecological economy of Shennongjia Forest Region are put forward.
引文
[1]张丽琼,赵雪雁,郭芳,等.石羊河下游农户的土地利用行为及效率[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(6):1715-1722.
    [2]刘宁.深入贯彻落实中央决策部署,扎实推进丹江口库区及上游水土保持二期工程建设[J]中国水土保持,2012(8):1-3.
    [3]陈卓雅,郭泺,薛达元,等.基于GIS的新县生态敏感性分析[J].生态科学,2015,34(1):97-102.
    [4]邓晓军,许有鹏,翟禄新,等.城市河流健康评价指标体系构建及其应用[J].生态学报,2014,34(4):993-1001.
    [5]胡建.广东省安全生态型小流域综合治理实践[J].中国水土保持,2013(8):10-12.
    [6]郑晓,郑垂勇,冯云飞.基于生态文明的流域治理模式与路径研究[J].南京社会科学,2014,42(6):75-79.
    [7]孙昕,胡广.南方红壤区小流域水土保持综合效益定量评价方法探讨[J].土壤学,2017(20):25-21.
    [8]徐菲,王永刚,张楠,等.河流生态修复相关研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2014,23(3):515-520.
    [9]郑晓风,唐慧中.耤河示范区闫家河小流域综合治理效益评价[J].中国水土保持,2012(2):53-55.
    [10]王琦,杨勤科.区域水土保持效益评价指标体系及评价方法研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(2):32-36.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700