混合比例和添加剂对菊苣与青贮玉米混合青贮品质的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Effects of mixing ratio and additives on ensilage efficiency of mixed chicory and silage maize
  • 作者:梁小玉 ; 季杨 ; 易军 ; 付茂忠 ; 胡远彬
  • 英文作者:LIANG Xiao-yu;JI Yang;YI Jun;FU Mao-zhong;HU Yuan-bin;Sichuan Academy of Animal Sciences;
  • 关键词:菊苣 ; 青贮玉米 ; 混合青贮 ; 添加剂 ; 发酵品质 ; 营养成分
  • 英文关键词:chicory(Cichorium intybus);;silage maize;;mixed silage;;additive;;fermentation traits;;nutrient composition
  • 中文刊名:CYXB
  • 英文刊名:Acta Prataculturae Sinica
  • 机构:四川省畜牧科学研究院;
  • 出版日期:2018-02-20
  • 出版单位:草业学报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.27;No.151
  • 基金:四川省成果转化“将军菊苣新品种综合利用技术集成与示范推广”(2016省成果);; 四川省科技支撑(2016NYZ0039-4);; 四川省财政运行专项(SASA2016CZYX015)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:CYXB201802018
  • 页数:9
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:62-1105/S
  • 分类号:175-183
摘要
探讨不同混合比例和添加剂对菊苣和青贮玉米混合青贮饲料品质的影响,为调制高质量的混合青贮饲料提供理论依据。以菊苣和青贮玉米为原料,按质量比0∶1、1∶3、1∶1、3∶1和1∶0(分别用0C1M、1C3M、1C1M、3C1M、1C0M表示)进行混合青贮,并分别设置3个添加剂处理,即零添加、5g·t-1乳酸菌+5g·t-1纤维素酶(LX)和10g·t~(-1)乳酸菌+5g·t~(-1)纤维素酶(2LX),青贮60d后测定混合青贮饲料的营养成分和发酵品质。结果显示,菊苣与青贮玉米混合比例为0∶1和1∶1时青贮饲料的感官评价优于其余3种混合比例的,而且添加剂处理感官评定优于零添加处理的。菊苣和青贮玉米混合青贮可以形成养分互补,有助于均衡青贮饲料整体营养,在青贮原料中添加添加剂则可以提高青贮饲料发酵品质。混合青贮饲料的营养价值随菊苣比例增加而显著提高,但是发酵品质在菊苣混合青贮比例高于1∶1时显著降低。综合判定菊苣和青贮玉米1∶1混合时其青贮饲料品质最佳,其中又以1C1M/2LX处理最好,纤维组分(NDF和ADF)和氨态氮/总氮含量较低而粗蛋白和乳酸含量较高。
        We evaluated the effects of different mixing ratios and additives on the quality of silage made from mixtures of chicory and maize,to provide guidelines for producing high-quality silage.The ratios of maize and chicory by weight were 0∶1,1∶3,1∶1,3∶1,and 1∶0(0C1M,1C3M,1C1M,3C1M,1 C0M).There were three additive treatments for each mixing ratio:no additive,5 g·t~(-1) lactic acid bacteria(LD)+ 5 g·t-1 cellulose(LX),and 10 g/t LD + 5 g·t~(-1) cellulose(2 LX).The nutrient composition and fermentation traits were measured after 60 days of ensilage to identify the optimal treatment.For sensory characters,the 0∶1 and 1∶1 mixing ratios of chicory and maize resulted in better silage quality scores than the other three mixing ratios,especially in the treatments with additives.Silage made from mixtures of chicory and maize showed improved nutritional quality and additives facilitated the fermentation process.The nutritional value increased significantly with an increasing proportion of chicory,while the fermentation quality decreased substantially if the proportion of chicory was greater than 1∶1.In summary,silage made from a 1∶1 mixture of chicory and maize had the best quality among all the mixing ratios tested.The silages treated with 1C1M/2LX had the best nutritional quality,with lower levels of neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber,a low ratio of ammonia nitrogen to total nitrogen,and higher crude protein and lactic acid contents than those of the silages without additives.
引文
[1]Wang Q Z,Cui J.Perspectives and utilization technologies of chicory(Cichorium intybus L.):A review.African Journal of Biotechnology,2011,10(11):1966-1977.
    [2]Ren H W,Zhao T,Li J P,et al.Identification of lactic acid bacteria and fermentation characteristics of mixed ensilages of corn stover and cabbage waste.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2016,25(1):197-206.任海伟,赵拓,李金平,等.玉米秸秆与废弃白菜的混合青贮品质及乳酸菌多样性研究.草业学报,2016,25(1):197-206.
    [3]Wang C Z,Wang T.Feed Science.Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2003:122-140.王成章,王恬.饲料学.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003:122-140.
    [4]Zhao M M,Wang X G,Yu Z.Silage scoring of mixed alfalfa and corn silages.Chinese Journal of Animal Science,2015,51(21):20-24.赵苗苗,王显国,玉柱.苜蓿与全株玉米的混合青贮.中国畜牧杂志,2015,51(21):20-24.
    [5]Wang L,Sun Q Z,Zhang H J.A study on quality of mixed silage of alfalfa and corn.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2011,20(4):202-209.王林,孙启忠,张慧杰.苜蓿与玉米混合青贮质量研究.草业学报,2011,20(4):202-209.
    [6]Ge J,Yang C J,Yang Z M,et al.Quality of mixed naked oats(Avena nuda)and alfalfa(Medicago sativa)silage.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2015,24(4):104-113.葛剑,杨翠军,杨志敏,等.紫花苜蓿和裸燕麦混贮发酵品质和营养成分分析.草业学报,2015,24(4):104-113.
    [7]Jin S,Huang S Z,Zhong Y,et al.Evaluation of mixing silage of Musa paradisiacastems and leaves and Stylosnthes guianensis.Pratacultural Science,2016,33(3):512-518.金莎,黄世章,钟毅,等.香蕉茎叶与柱花草混贮饲料的品质.草业科学,2016,33(3):512-518.
    [8]Peng X P,Xiao X S,Li J.The comparison of different silage nutritional value.Chinese Journal of Animal Science,2009,45(19):47-49.彭晓培,肖西山,李静.不同青贮饲料营养价值的比较.中国畜牧杂志,2009,45(19):47-49.
    [9]Xu C C.Silage Science and Techonlogy.Beijing:Science Press,2013.徐春城.现代青贮理论与技术.北京:科学出版社,2013.
    [10]Filya I,Ashbell G,Hen Y,et al.The effect of bacterial inoculants on the fermentation and aerobic stability of whole crop wheat silage.Animal Feed Science and Technology,2000,88:39-46.
    [11]Krishnamoorthu U,Muscato T V,Sniffen C J,et al.Nitrogen fractions in selected feed stuffs.Journal of Dairy Science,1982,65:217-225.
    [12]Vansoest P J,Robertson J B,Lewis B A.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation nutrition.Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74:3583-3597.
    [13]Owens V N,Albrecht K A,Muck R E,et al.Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates.Crop Science,1999,39:1873-1880.
    [14]Broderica G A,Kang J H.Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media.Dairy Science,1980,33:64-75.
    [15]Zhang L Y.Feed Analysis and Quality Inspection Technology.Beijing:China Agricultural University Press,2003.张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003.
    [16]Huang X H.Sophora alopecuroides and Corn Straw Mixed Silaging and Quality Evaluation of Silage.Lanzhou:Lanzhou University,2014.黄晓辉.苦豆子和玉米秸秆的混合青贮及其品质评价.兰州:兰州大学,2014.
    [17]Xi X J,Han L J,Hara S I,et al.Effects of lactobacillus and cellulase on the quality of corn stover silage.Journal of China Agricultural University,2003,8(2):21-24.席兴军,韩鲁佳,原慎一郎,等.添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对玉米秸秆青贮饲料品质的影响.中国农业大学学报,2003,8(2):21-24.
    [18]Ren H W,Wang C,Dou J W,et al.Mixed ensiling quality of maize straw with waste cabbage and biogas production potential analysis.Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2016,32(12):187-193.任海伟,王聪,窦俊伟,等.玉米秸秆与废弃白菜的混合青贮品质及产沼气能力分析.农业工程学报,2016,32(12):187-193.
    [19]Gu Y J,Zhan J S,Sha W F,et al.Comparative analysis on fermentation quality and nutrition content of ensiled soybean straw and corn straw.China Feed,2016,(6):21-24.顾拥建,占今舜,沙文锋,等.不同比例大豆秸和玉米秸混贮的发酵品质及养分含量比较分析.中国饲料,2016,(6):21-24.
    [20]Liang H,Liu G B,Wu J H,et al.Effects of mixed silage modes on the fermentation quality and in vitro gas dynamics of a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid(Sorghum bicolor×Sorghum sudanense).Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2016,25(4):188-196.梁欢,刘贵波,吴佳海,等.混贮模式对高丹草青贮发酵品质及体外产气动力学特性的影响.草业学报,2016,25(4):188-196.
    [21]Guo Y Q,He X,Sun X L.The effect of different moisture content on nutrients of alfalfa silage.Contemporary Animal Husbandry,2005,12:38-39.郭玉琴,何欣,孙晓利.不同含水率对苜蓿青贮营养成分的影响.当代畜牧,2005,12:38-39.
    [22]Guo X S,Zhou H,Liu G X.Proteolysis in alfalfa silage and its inhibiting method.Pratacultural Science,2005,22(11):50-54.郭旭生,周禾,刘桂霞.苜蓿青贮过程中蛋白的分解及抑制方法.草业科学,2005,22(11):50-54.
    [23]Yu J,Zheng C,Li F D,et al.An evaluation of mixed-ensiling sunflower straw and whole corn on silage quality.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2013,22(5):198-204.于杰,郑琛,李发弟,等.向日葵秸秆与全株玉米混合青贮饲料品质评定.草业学报,2013,22(5):198-204.
    [24]Huang X H,Li S C,Li D H,et al.Fermentation quality and content of poisonous substances in Sophora alopecuroides and corn straw mixed silage.Pratacultural Science,2013,30(10):1633-1639.黄晓辉,李树成,李东华,等.苦豆子和玉米秸秆的混合青贮.草业科学,2013,30(10):1633-1639.
    [25]Ge J,Yang C J,Liu G H,et al.Effects of additives and crop ratio on quality of mixed naked oat(Avena nuda)and alfalfa(Medicago sativa)silage.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2015,24(6):116-124.葛剑,杨翠军,刘贵河,等.添加剂和混合比例对裸燕麦和紫花苜蓿混贮品质的影响.草业学报,2015,24(6):116-124.
    [26]Li W Y,Chen X Z,Liu Y,et al.Effects of mixed ratio and additive on efficiency of mixed dilage of hybrid pennisetum and ramie.Journal of Domestic Animal Ecology,2016,37(8):50-54,60.李文杨,陈鑫珠,刘远,等.添加剂和混合比例对杂交狼尾草苎麻混合青贮品质的影响.家畜生态学报,2016,37(8):50-54,60.
    [27]Zhuang S,Ding L R,Zhou J G,et al.Effects of formic acid,cellulase and xylanase on fermentation quality of Lolium multiflorum and Trifolium repens mixture silage during ensiling.Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Science,2013,29(1):140-146.庄苏,丁立人,周建国,等.甲酸与纤维素酶和木聚糖酶对多花黑麦草与白三叶混合青贮料发酵品质的影响.江苏农业学报,2013,29(1):140-146.
    [28]Wu J D.Optimization study on the mixture silage modes of several crop straws by orthogonal design.China Feed,2008,(3):33-35,40.吴进东.正交设计优化农作物秸秆混合青贮模式.中国饲料,2008,(3):33-35,40.
    [29]Yan Y H,Li J L,Guo X S,et al.A study on fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass and soybean straw mixed silage.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2014,23(4):94-99.闫艳红,李君临,郭旭生,等.多花黑麦草与大豆秸秆混合青贮发酵品质的研究.草业学报,2014,23(4):94-99.
    [30]McDonald P,Henderson A R,Heron S J E.The Biochemistry of Silage.2th ed.Aberystwyth,Cambrian Printers Ltd,1991.
    [31]Zhang J,Yuan X J,Guo G,et al.Effect of additive on fermentation quality of mixed silages of oat(Avena sativa)and common vetch(Vicia sativa)in Tibet.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2014,23(5):359-364.张洁,原现军,郭刚,等.添加剂对西藏燕麦和箭筈豌豆混合青贮发酵品质的影响.草业学报,2014,23(5):359-364.
    [32]Zhang Y D,Yang J X,Wang Z W,et al.Progress assessment of chemical indicators of silage.Chinese Journal of Animal Science,2016,52(12):37-42.张养东,杨军香,王宗伟,等.青贮饲料理化品质评定研究进展.中国畜牧杂志,2016,52(12):37-42.
    [33]Zhou J J.Study on Pepper and Potato Stems and Leaves Silage Modulation.Lanzhou:Gansu Agricultural University,2014.周娟娟.辣椒秧和马铃薯秧青贮调制研究.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2014.
    [34]Wang Q,Yu C Q,Li Z H,et al.Effect of adding coenzyme and lactic acid bacteria on fermentation quality of mixed silages of tall fescue(Festuca arundinacea)and common vetch(Vicia sativa)in Tibet.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2012,21(4):186-191.王奇,余成群,李志华,等.添加酶和乳酸菌制剂对西藏苇状羊茅和箭筈豌豆混合青贮发酵品质的影响.草业学报,2012,21(4):186-191.
    [35]Jia C W,Yuan X J,Li J F,et al.Effect of adding wet hulless barley distillers’grains on fermentation quality of mixed ensilage of alfalfa and perennial ryegrass.Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University,2016,39(2):275-280.贾春旺,原现军,李君风,等.青稞酒糟对紫花苜蓿和多年生黑麦草混合青贮发酵品质的影响.南京农业大学学报,2016,39(2):275-280.
    [36]Ge J,Yang C J,Liu G H,et al.Effects of mixed ratio and effective microorganism(EM)addition on the mixed silage quality of alfalfa(Medicago sativa L.)and naked oats(Avena nuda).Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis,2015,27(12):2093-2099.葛剑,杨翠军,刘贵河,等.混合比例和添加EM菌剂对紫花苜蓿和裸燕麦混贮品质的影响.浙江农业学报,2015,27(12):2093-2099.
    [37]Kaiser E,Weib K,Krause R.Beurteilung skriterien fur die quality on grass silage.Proceedings of the Society for Nutritional Physiology,2000,(9):94-101.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700