基于FAHP-TOPSIS法的环渤海湾绿色港口评价研究
|
摘要
为了更好的评价港口的绿色发展状况,促进港口的绿色转型,从经济、社会、生态三个维度构建了绿色港口评价体系,将FAHP和TOPSIS两种方法相结合,分析了环渤海湾地区的青岛港、天津港、大连港等8个港口的绿色发展状况。研究结果表明,在绿色港口评价中,经济指标、社会指标和生态指标所占权重分别为0.235、0.337和0.428,说明大力发展绿色港口应首先从生态入手。8个港口的绿色绩效排名中,青岛港在绿色港口评价中处于最优状态。通过探讨港口发展中存在的问题,提出科学合理的发展策略。构建的指标和方法可用于评价其他港口,为其向绿色港口转型提供参考和借鉴。
In order to better evaluate the green development status of the port and promote the green transformation of the port,the green port evaluation system is constructed from the three dimensions of economy,society and ecology.The combination of FAHP and TOPSIS methods is used to analyze the green development status of 8 ports including Qingdao Port,Tianjin Port and Dalian Port in the Bohai Bay area.The results show that the weights of economic indicators,social indicators and ecological indicators are 0.235,0.337 and 0.428,respectively,indicating that the first step to develop green ports should take ecology into account.The green performance rankings of the eight ports are obtained,and Qingdao Port ranks first in the evaluation of green ports.Through discussing the problems existing in port development,a scientific and reasonable development strategy is put forward.The indicators and methods constructed can be used to evaluate other ports,which can also provide reference for their transition to green ports.
In order to better evaluate the green development status of the port and promote the green transformation of the port,the green port evaluation system is constructed from the three dimensions of economy,society and ecology.The combination of FAHP and TOPSIS methods is used to analyze the green development status of 8 ports including Qingdao Port,Tianjin Port and Dalian Port in the Bohai Bay area.The results show that the weights of economic indicators,social indicators and ecological indicators are 0.235,0.337 and 0.428,respectively,indicating that the first step to develop green ports should take ecology into account.The green performance rankings of the eight ports are obtained,and Qingdao Port ranks first in the evaluation of green ports.Through discussing the problems existing in port development,a scientific and reasonable development strategy is put forward.The indicators and methods constructed can be used to evaluate other ports,which can also provide reference for their transition to green ports.
引文
[1]余德松,张华,闵世雄,等.我国绿色港口的建设与发展[J].中国水运(下半月),2014,14(2):55-56.
[2]黄晗,莫东序,程婉静.基于ANP模型的绿色港口竞争力评价[J].技术经济,2017,36(2):117-122.
[3]聂鲸郦.绿色港口建设:深圳如何推进[J].开放导报,2017(6):67-69.
[4]刘翠莲,郁斢兰.论中国绿色港口建设[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2011,24(3):328-331.
[5] Lu C S,Shang K C,Lin C C,et al.Identifying crucial sustainability assessment criteria for international ports[J].International Forum on Shipping Ports&Airports Transport Logistics for Sustainable Growth at A New Level,2012(14):102-110.
[6] Chiu R H,Linl H,Tinc S C.Evaluation of green port factors and performance:A fuzzy AHP analysis[J].Mathematical Problems in Engineering,2013(5):1-12.
[7]瞿群臻,刘帅.绿色低碳港口评价研究[J].工业技术经济,2013(12):57-63.
[8] Bin O Y,Wang L,Feng Z H,et al.Study on Green and Low-Carbon Port Evaluation Index System:Case Study of Guangzhou Port[J].Advanced Materials Research,2014,1010-1012:1918-1923.
[9] Zhu L,Peng C S,He W.The green port grade evaluation method based on AHP[J].Advanced Materials Research,2014,12:1557-1560.
[10]Asgari N,Hassani A,Jones D,et al.Sustainability ranking of the UK major ports:methodology and case study[J].Transportation Research Part E,2015,78:19-39.
[11]Wan C,Zhang D,Yan X,et al.A novel model for the quantitative evaluation of green port development—A case study of major ports in China[J].Transportation Research Part D Transport&Environment,2017,61:431-443.
[12]赵谞博.绿色低碳港口指标评价模型及发展模式研究[J].港工技术,2017,54(5):80-83.
[13]Wang H,Huo D,Ortiz J.Assessing energy efficiency of port operations in China-A case study on sustainable development of green ports[J].Open Journal of Social Sciences,2017,3(5):28-33.
[14]陈姝灵.基于DPSIR模型的绿色港口评价研究[J].中国水运月刊,2016,16(10):75-77.
[15]刘翠莲,王璇,姜大植.基于DPSIR模型的油品码头低碳绿色发展评价[J].上海海事大学学报,2017(1):43-46.
[16]Sirisawat P,Kiacharoenpol T.Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approaches to prioritizing solutions for reverse logistics barriers[J].Computers&Industrial Engineering,2018,117:303-318.
[17]Jia J,Fan Y,Guo X.The low carbon development(LCD)levels’evaluation of the world’s 47countries(areas)by combining the FAHP with the TOPSIS method[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2012,39(7):6628-6640.
[18]Taylan O,BafailL A O,Abdulaal R M S,et al.Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies[J].Applied Soft Computing Journal,2014,17(4):105-116.
[19]Chang D Y.Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1996,95(3):649-655.
[2]黄晗,莫东序,程婉静.基于ANP模型的绿色港口竞争力评价[J].技术经济,2017,36(2):117-122.
[3]聂鲸郦.绿色港口建设:深圳如何推进[J].开放导报,2017(6):67-69.
[4]刘翠莲,郁斢兰.论中国绿色港口建设[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2011,24(3):328-331.
[5] Lu C S,Shang K C,Lin C C,et al.Identifying crucial sustainability assessment criteria for international ports[J].International Forum on Shipping Ports&Airports Transport Logistics for Sustainable Growth at A New Level,2012(14):102-110.
[6] Chiu R H,Linl H,Tinc S C.Evaluation of green port factors and performance:A fuzzy AHP analysis[J].Mathematical Problems in Engineering,2013(5):1-12.
[7]瞿群臻,刘帅.绿色低碳港口评价研究[J].工业技术经济,2013(12):57-63.
[8] Bin O Y,Wang L,Feng Z H,et al.Study on Green and Low-Carbon Port Evaluation Index System:Case Study of Guangzhou Port[J].Advanced Materials Research,2014,1010-1012:1918-1923.
[9] Zhu L,Peng C S,He W.The green port grade evaluation method based on AHP[J].Advanced Materials Research,2014,12:1557-1560.
[10]Asgari N,Hassani A,Jones D,et al.Sustainability ranking of the UK major ports:methodology and case study[J].Transportation Research Part E,2015,78:19-39.
[11]Wan C,Zhang D,Yan X,et al.A novel model for the quantitative evaluation of green port development—A case study of major ports in China[J].Transportation Research Part D Transport&Environment,2017,61:431-443.
[12]赵谞博.绿色低碳港口指标评价模型及发展模式研究[J].港工技术,2017,54(5):80-83.
[13]Wang H,Huo D,Ortiz J.Assessing energy efficiency of port operations in China-A case study on sustainable development of green ports[J].Open Journal of Social Sciences,2017,3(5):28-33.
[14]陈姝灵.基于DPSIR模型的绿色港口评价研究[J].中国水运月刊,2016,16(10):75-77.
[15]刘翠莲,王璇,姜大植.基于DPSIR模型的油品码头低碳绿色发展评价[J].上海海事大学学报,2017(1):43-46.
[16]Sirisawat P,Kiacharoenpol T.Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approaches to prioritizing solutions for reverse logistics barriers[J].Computers&Industrial Engineering,2018,117:303-318.
[17]Jia J,Fan Y,Guo X.The low carbon development(LCD)levels’evaluation of the world’s 47countries(areas)by combining the FAHP with the TOPSIS method[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2012,39(7):6628-6640.
[18]Taylan O,BafailL A O,Abdulaal R M S,et al.Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies[J].Applied Soft Computing Journal,2014,17(4):105-116.
[19]Chang D Y.Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1996,95(3):649-655.