利用集合均方根卡尔曼滤波反演重庆地区SO_2源排放
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Inversion of SO_2 Emissions over Chongqing with Ensemble Square Root Kalman Filter
  • 作者:吴钲 ; 谢旻 ; 高阳华 ; 芦华 ; 赵磊 ; 高松
  • 英文作者:WU Zheng;XIE Min;GAO Yanghua;LU Hua;ZHAO Lei;GAO Song;Chongqing Institute of Meteorological Sciences;Nanjing University;
  • 关键词:SO2 ; WRF-CMAQ ; 源排放反演 ; 集合均方根卡尔曼滤波
  • 英文关键词:SO2;;WRF-CMAQ;;inversion estimation;;ensemble square root Kalman filter
  • 中文刊名:HJKX
  • 英文刊名:Research of Environmental Sciences
  • 机构:重庆市气象科学研究所;南京大学;
  • 出版日期:2017-10-11 14:36
  • 出版单位:环境科学研究
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.31;No.240
  • 基金:国家科技支撑计划项目(2014BAC16B06);; 重庆市气象局开放式研究基金项目(KFJJ-201607)~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HJKX201801005
  • 页数:9
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:11-1827/X
  • 分类号:32-40
摘要
传统的"自下而上"清单方法估算的排放清单,其数据的准确性和时效性存在较大局限.基于集合均方根卡尔曼滤波的源清单反演方法,结合WRF-CMAQ(天气研究和预报模式-公共多尺度空气质量模型)被用于对以清华大学编制的2010年MEIC(中国多尺度排放清单模型)排放清单为基础制作的重庆地区SO_2排放源进行反演试验以解决准确性和时效性问题,试验时间段为2014年10月15—31日,重庆主城17个环境空气质量国控监测点ρ(SO_2)小时观测资料用于反演及检验.结果表明:该方法能够反演重庆地区SO_2源排放量,随着反演次数增加,基于反演排放源预报的ρ(SO_2)预报误差持续减小,反演4次后预报误差达到比较低的稳定的水平,其均方根误差均低于20μg/m~3.5次反演后SO_2源排放量用于2014年10月24—29日每天起始预报,其预报的站点、时间平均的均方根误差从100~400μg/m~3降至30μg/m~3以下.反演中应用局地化尺度减少集合取样误差影响,54与81 km两个局地化尺度反演结果对预报改善效果相当,表明主要影响重庆主城ρ(SO_2)的源排放位于主城及周边地区,也说明内源排放对重庆主城ρ(SO_2)起主要影响.反演后面源排放量主城区降幅约为30 kg/(d·km~2),周边地区减少10~20 kg/(d·km~2),主城区部分SO_2点源排放量降幅约为25 kg/(d·km~2),说明2010年MEIC排放清单高估了试验时段重庆地区的SO_2排放.
        Emissions inventories based on the‘bottom-up'inventory method have many problems with respect to accuracy and time.To solve this problem,an inversion of the SO_2 emission over Chongqing from October 15 thto 31 st,2014 was performed with WRF-CMAQ coupled with an ensemble square root Kalman filter.The initial SO_2 emissions estimates come from the 2010 Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China developed by Tsinghua University.Hourly observations of SO_2 concentrations at 17 state air quality monitoring stations over the downtown area of Chongqing were used for inversion and verification.The results show that the ensemble square root Kalman filter is suitable for inverting SO_2 emissions over Chongqing.The forecast error decreased gradually as the number of inversion emissions increased; additionally,the root mean square errors of the forecast concentration of SO_2 were all less than 20 μg/m~3 after four inversions.Localization was employed to account for ensemble sampling error.The experiments using a localization distance of 54 and 81 km had similar results,demonstrating that the concentrations of SO_2 in Chongqing are primarily affected by the SO_2 emission inventories surrounding the area and that the inner sources are primarily responsible for the concentration of SO_2 in the downtown area of Chongqing.The average root mean square error of several station forecasts,initialized at each day from October 24 thto 29 th,2014,decreased from100-400 μg/m~3 to concentrations less than 30 μg/m~3.The estimated SO_2 emissions of the area decreased by approximately 30 kg/(d·km~2)and 10-20 kg/(d·km~2) in the downtown and surrounding areas of Chongqing,respectively; meanwhile,point emissions decreased byapproximately 25 kg/(d·km~2) in part of the downtown area.The regional SO_2 emissions inventories from 2010 MEIC were overestimated over Chongqing during the experiment.
引文
[1]徐鹏,郝庆菊,吉东生,等.重庆市北碚大气中PM2.5、NOx、SO2和O3浓度变化特征研究[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(5):1539-1547.XU Peng,HAO Qingju,JI Dongsheng,et al.Characteristics of atmospheric PM2.5,NOx,SO2and O3in Beibei District,Chongqing[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2016,36(5):1539-1547.
    [2]江文华,刘德,陈勇航,等.1980—2012年重庆地区霾日时空变化特征[J].干旱气象,2015,33(4):602-606.JIANG Wenhua,LIU De,CHEN Yonghang,et al.Temporal and spatial variations of haze days in Chongqing from 1980 to 2012[J].Journal of Arid Meteorology,2015,33(4):602-606.
    [3]李九彬,王建力.2001—2011年重庆市空气质量特征分析[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,35(9):145-153.LI Jiubin,WANG Jianli.An analysis of air quality characteristics of Chongqing(2001-2011)[J].Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition),2013,35(9):145-153.
    [4]BINKOWSKI F S,ROSELLE S J.Models-3 community multiscale air quality(CMAQ)model aerosol component 1.model description[J].Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres,2003,108(D6):335-346.
    [5]李荔,刘倩,李冰,等.南京青奥会期间管控措施空气质量改善效果评估[J].环境科学研究,2016,29(2):175-182.LI Li,LIU Qian,LI Bing,et al.Assessment of air quality benefits from control measures during Nanjing Youth Olympic Games[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2016,29(2):175-182.
    [6]陈焕盛,吴其重,王自发,等.华北火电厂脱硫对奥运期间区域空气质量的影响[J].环境科学学报,2014,34(3):598-605.CHEN Huansheng,WU Qizhong,WANG Zifa,et al.Impacts of power plant desulfurization on regional air quality over North China Plain during the Olympic Games[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2014,34(3):598-605.
    [7]李岩,安兴琴,左洪超,等.2008年北京奥运交通限制效果的模式研究[J].高原气象,2010,29(6):1619-1626.LI Yan,AN Xingqin,ZUO Hongchao,et al.Study of traffic restriction effects on air quality during Beijing Olympic Games in2008 using CMAQ model[J].Plateau Meteorology,2010,29(6):1619-1626.
    [8]张珏,孟凡,何友江,等.长江三角洲地区大气二英类污染物输送-沉降模拟研究[J].环境科学研究,2011,24(12):1393-1402.ZHANG Jue,MENG Fan,HE Youjiang,et al.Simulation of transport-deposition of dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in the atmosphere in the Yangtze River Delta region[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2011,24(12):1393-1402.
    [9]边敏娟,钱骏,刘志红,等.四川中东部地区2009年大气硫沉降模拟[J].环境科学研究,2012,25(10):1115-1119.BIAN Minjuan,QIAN Jun,LIU Zhihong,et al.Modeling study on atmospheric sulfur deposition in the eastern and central regions of Sichuan area in 2009[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2012,25(10):1115-1119.
    [10]余纬,罗栩羽,范绍佳,等.珠三角一次重空气污染过程特征分析及数值模拟[J].环境科学研究,2011,24(6):645-653.YU Wei,LUO Xuyu,FAN Shaojia,et al.Characteristics analysis and numerical simulation study of a severe air pollution episode over the Pearl River Delta[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2011,24(6):645-653.
    [11]唐孝炎,张远航,邵敏.大气环境化学[M].2版.北京:高等教育出版社,2006:447-453.
    [12]LEE C,MARTIN R V,VAN DONKELAAR A,et al.SO2emissions and lifetimes:estimates from inverse modeling using in situ and global,space-based(SCIAMACHY and OMI)observations[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2011.doi:10.1029/2010JD014758.
    [13]ELBERN H,STRUNK A,SCHMIDT H,et al.Emission rate and chemical state estimation by 4-dimensional variational inversion[J].Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2007,7(1):3749-3769.
    [14]BOUSQUET P,CIAIS P,PEYLIN P,et al.Inverse modeling of annual atmospheric CO2sources and sinks 1.method and control inversion[J].Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres,1999,104(D21):26161-26178.
    [15]KOPACZ M,JACOB D J,HENZE D K,et al.Comparison of adjoint and analytical Bayesian inversion methods for constraining Asian sources of carbon monoxide using satellite(MOPITT)measurements of CO columns[J].Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres,2009.doi:10.1029/2007JD009264.
    [16]蔡旭晖,邵敏,苏芳.甲烷排放源逆向轨迹反演模式研究[J].环境科学,2002,23(5):19-24.CAI Xuhui,SHAO Min,SU Fang.A backward trajectory inversion model for methane emission over Beijing area[J].Environmental Science,2002,23(5):19-24.
    [17]程兴宏,徐祥德,安兴琴,等.2013年1月华北地区重霾污染过程SO2和NOx的CMAQ源同化模拟研究[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(2):638-648.CHENG Xinghong,XU Xiangde,AN Xingqin,et al.Inverse modeling of SO2and NOxemissions using an adaptive nudging scheme implemented in CMAQ model in North China during heavy haze episodes in January 2013[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2016,36(2):638-648.
    [18]朱江,汪萍.集合卡尔曼平滑和集合卡尔曼滤波在污染源反演中的应用[J].大气科学,2006,30(5):871-882.ZHU Jiang,WANG Ping.Ensemble Kalman smoother and ensemble Kalman filter approaches to the joint air quality state and emission estimation problem[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences,2006,30(5):871-882.
    [19]MIYAZAKI K,ESKES H J,SUDO K.Global NOxemission estimates derived from an assimilation of OMI tropospheric NO2columns[J].Atmospheric Chemistry&Physics,2012,11(5):31523-31583.
    [20]TANG X,ZHU J,WANG Z F,et al.Inversion of CO emissions over Beijing and its surrounding areas with ensemble Kalman filter[J].Atmospheric Environment,2013,81(4):676-686.
    [21]BISHOP C H,ETHERTON B J,MAJUMDAR S J.Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter.part I:theoretical aspects[J].Monthly Weather Review,2001,129(3):420-436.
    [22]ANDERSON J L.An ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation[J].Monthly Weather Review,2003,129(12):2884-2903.
    [23]WHITAKER J S,HAMILL T M.Ensemble data assimilation without perturbed observations[J].Monthly Weather Review,2002,130(7):1913-1924.
    [24]HAMILL T M,WHITAKER J S,SNYDER C.Distance-dependent filtering of background error covariance estimates in an ensemble Kalman filter[J].Monthly Weather Review,2001,129(11):2776-2790.
    [25]ANDERSON J L.Exploring the need for localization in ensemble data assimilation using a hierarchical ensemble filter[J].Physica D:Nonlinear Phenomena,2007,230(1/2):99-111.
    [26]SEKIYAMA T T,TANAKA T Y,SHIMIZU A,et al.Data assimilation of CALIPSO aerosol observations[J].Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2009,10(1):39-49.
    [27]SOBASH R A,STENSRUD D J.The impact of covariance localization for radar data on En KF analyses of a developing MCS:observing system simulation experiments[J].Monthly Weather Review,2013,141(11):3691-3709.
    [28]唐晓,朱江,王自发,等.基于集合卡尔曼滤波的区域臭氧资料同化试验[J].环境科学学报,2013,33(3):796-805.TANG Xiao,ZHU Jiang,WANG Zifa,et al.Regional ozone data assimilation experiment based on ensemble Kalman filter[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2013,33(3):796-805.
    [29]WHITAKER J S,HAMILL T M,WEI X,et al.Ensemble data assimilation with the NCEP global forecast system[J].Monthly Weather Review,2008,136(2):463-482.
    [30]SKAMAROCK W C,KLEMP J B,DUDHIA J,et al.A description of the advanced research WRF version 3[EB/OL].Boulder,Colorado,USA:National Center for Atmospheric Research,2008[2008-06].http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/arw_v3.pdf.
    [31]GUENTHER A,KARL T,HARLEY P,et al.Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN(Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature)[J].Atmospheric Chemistry&Physics,2006,6(11):3181-3210.
    [32]EVENSEN G.Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasigeostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics[J].Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans,1994,99(C5):10143-10162.
    [33]崔应杰,王自发,朱江,等.空气质量数值模式预报中资料同化的初步研究[J].气候与环境研究,2006,11(5):616-626.CUI Yingjie,WANG Zifa,ZHU Jiang,et al.A preliminary study on data assimilation for numerical air quality model prediction[J].Climatic and Environmental Research,2006,11(5):616-626.
    [34]HOUTEKAMER P L,MITCHELL H L.A sequential ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation[J].Monthly Weather Review,2001,129(1):123-137.
    [35]张玉洽,杨迎春,李杰,等.东南亚生物质燃烧对我国春季PM2.5质量浓度影响的数值模拟[J].环境科学研究,2016,29(7):952-962.ZHANG Yuqia,YANG Yingchun,LI Jie,et al.Modeling the impacts of biomass burning in Southeast Asia on PM2.5over China in spring[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2016,29(7):952-962.
    [36]王芳,陈东升,程水源,等.基于气流轨迹聚类的大气污染输送影响[J].环境科学研究,2009,22(6):637-642.WANG Fang,CHEN Dongsheng,CHENG Shuiyuan,et al.Impacts of air pollutant transport based on air trajectory clustering[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2009,22(6):637-642.
    [37]程念亮,李云婷,张大伟,等.2014年10月北京市4次典型空气重污染过程成因分析[J].环境科学研究,2015,28(2):163-170.CHENG Nianliang,LI Yunting,ZHANG Dawei,et al.Analysis about the characteristics and formation mechanisms of serious pollution events in October 2014 in Beijing[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2015,28(2):163-170.
    [38]程兴宏.空气质量模式“源同化”模型及排放源影响效应研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2008:1-149.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700