蒋庄煤矿16煤层矿井涌水量预计探讨
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Discussion on Prediction of Mine Water Inflow in No.16 Coal Layer in Jiangzhuang Coal Mine
  • 作者:孔凡杜
  • 英文作者:KONG Fandu;No.1 Exploration Brigade of Shandong Coalfield Geology Bureau;
  • 关键词:矿井涌水量 ; 16煤层 ; 蒋庄煤矿 ; 滕县煤田 ; 山东省
  • 英文关键词:Mine water Inflow;;No.16 coal layer;;Jiangzhuang coal mine;;Tengxian coal mine;;Shandong province
  • 中文刊名:SDDI
  • 英文刊名:Shandong Land and Resources
  • 机构:山东省煤田地质局第一勘探队;
  • 出版日期:2017-05-15
  • 出版单位:山东国土资源
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.33
  • 基金:基金项目:枣庄矿业(集团)有限责任公司蒋庄煤矿,2016年蒋庄煤矿矿井水文地质类型划分报告
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SDDI201705012
  • 页数:6
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:37-1411/P
  • 分类号:71-75+80
摘要
蒋庄煤矿的主采煤层将由开采3煤层逐渐变为16煤层。为了合理设置和调整矿井排水系统,更好地开展16煤层矿井防治水工作,尽可能准确地预计矿井涌水量。矿井16煤层已开采了多年,其矿井涌水规律需要根据近几年的资料进行总结和研究,对涌水量进行预计。简要分析了蒋庄煤矿矿井水文地质条件,结合矿井实际,对16煤层充水因素进行了分析,确定开采16煤层主要充水水源为十下灰含水层。在此基础上对16煤层涌水量进行了预计,并对预计结果进行了评价。该文分别采用大井法、比拟法和趋势线预测法等3种方法对矿井涌水量进行了预计,其中对传统的大井法进行了改进,并创造性地运用了趋势线预测法,并对各种方法的可靠程度进行了评价,对各种方法预计结果进行比较,在此基础上确定预计的矿井涌水量,从而使得预计的结果更加科学、合理,为下一步矿井防治水工作提供了可靠的依据。
        Major coal mining layer of Jiangzhuang coal mine is chaning from No.3 coal layer to No.16 coal layer. In order to reasonably set and adjust mine drainage system of No,16 coal layer,carry out water prevention and control work,mine water gushing should be predicted accurately as much as possible. No.16 coal layer has been explored for many years. The rule of mine gushing water should be summarized and studied based on the data in recent years,and the gushing water is predicted. In this paper,hydrogeological conditions of Jiangzhuang coal mine has been briefly analyzed. Combining with actual condition of the mine,filling water source of No. 16 coal layer has been analyzed. It is determined that main water source in No.16 coal layer is water-bearing layer of the lower part of No.10 ash aquifer. On these basis,water inflow of No.16 coal layer is predicted,and the prediction result is evaluated. By using large well method,comparison method and trend line prediction method,mine water discharge has been predicted. Traditional well method is improved and the trend line prediction method is used creatively. On this basis,the expected mine water discharge quantity is determined,which makes the forecast result more scientific and reasonable,which provides a reliable basis for the next work of mine prevention and control.
引文
[1]肖乐乐,魏久传,牛超,等.滕县煤田滕南矿区水文地质单元划分研究[J].河南理工大学学报,2015,(5):634-639.
    [2]尹会永,Liliana Lefticariu,魏久传,等.蒋庄煤矿太原组煤层开采底板突水危险性分区分级研究[J].中国矿业,2015,(10):149-154.
    [3]张增奇,张成基,王世进,等.山东省地层侵入岩构造单元划分对比意见[J].山东国土资源,2014,30(3):1-24.
    [4]孔庆友,张天祯,于学峰,等.山东矿床[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2006.
    [5]刘军.济宁煤田岱庄井田断层构造特征及其对生产的影响[J].山东国土资源,2016,32(11):31-35.
    [6]朱昌元,李文东.滕州崔庄煤矿矿井涌水量研究[J].山东国土资源,2007,31(8):37-41.
    [7]赵蕻,谢兴友.山东省金阳煤矿矿井水文地质特征分析及涌水量预测[J].山东国土资源,2015,23(6):64-66.
    [8]孙茂田,张忠涛.苍山县大青山铁矿矿床水文地质特征与涌水量预测[J].山东国土资源,2015,31(2):19-23.
    [9]朱昶.新疆吉木萨尔县吉新煤矿水文地质类型划分探析[J].山东国土资源,2015,31(1):43-45.
    [10]建筑物、水体、铁路及主要巷道煤柱留设与压煤开采规程[S].
    [11]王继芳,韩廷宝,杜显彪,等.滕县煤田滨湖煤矿16煤层开采技术条件浅析[J].山东国土资源,2016,32(1):42-47.
    [12]于为雁,魏久传,于建龙,等.南屯煤矿17煤底板奥灰突水危险性综合评价[J].山东国土资源,2015,31(10):64-66.
    [13]国家安全生产监督管理总局.煤矿防治水规定[S].
    [14]杨明,郭长胜,杨月,等.山东省平邑玉荣石膏矿“12·25”事故救援过程中的水文地质问题分析[J].山东国土资源,2016,32(12):41-50.
    [15]扈媛.山东省平邑县唐家崖石膏矿区东段水文地质特征分析[J].山东国土资源,2015,31(11):38-41.
    [16]MT/T 1091-2008.煤矿床水文地质、工程地质及环境地质勘查评价标准[S].
    [17]施鑫源,阮淼森,王世杰,等.供水水文地质手册第二册[M].北京:地质出版社,1983:268.
    [18]吴群英,林亮.应用数理统计[M].天津:天津大学出版社,2004.
    [19]李本军,来永伟.Q-S曲线判定及问题探讨[J].中国煤炭地质,2012,24(9):41-43.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700