新疆天山遗产地居民对生态移民的感知及满意度研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Residents’ perception and satisfaction on ecological migration in Xinjiang Tianshan heritage site
  • 作者:王芳 ; 栾福明 ; 杨兆萍 ; 熊黑钢 ; 韩芳 ; 时卉 ; 王昭国
  • 英文作者:WANG Fang;LUAN Fu-ming;YANG Zhao-ping;XIONG Hei-gang;HAN Fang;SHI Hui;WANG Zhao-guo;Business School,Lishui University;Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography,Chinese Academy of Sciences;College of Art and Science,Beijing Union University;School of Tourism Management,Sun Yat-sen University;
  • 关键词:遗产地 ; 生态移民感知 ; 居民满意度
  • 英文关键词:heritage site;;perception on ecological immigration;;resident satisfaction
  • 中文刊名:GHDL
  • 英文刊名:Arid Land Geography
  • 机构:丽水学院商学院;中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所;北京联合大学应用文理学院;中山大学旅游学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-18 14:41
  • 出版单位:干旱区地理
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.42;No.185
  • 基金:中国科学院科技服务网络计划(KFJ-SW-STS-181);; 国家重点研发计划重点专项(2016YFC0503306);; 国家自然科学基金(41671198);; 丽水市公益性技术应用研究项目(2016GYX21)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GHDL201903023
  • 页数:11
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:65-1103/X
  • 分类号:197-207
摘要
在遗产地生态移民能否实现生态保护、改善民生、旅游可持续发展的多赢是遗产研究者、决策者和居民共同关注的问题。通过问卷调查和深入访谈法对新疆天山的4个移民社区进行调研,从居民感知和满意度的角度评估移民效果。结果表明:(1)居民对经济、心理正面影响反对率高,社会影响感知存在分歧,环境正面影响赞成率高。生态环境保护成效明显,但居民收入、生活质量改善不大,社区归属感弱。(2)居民满意度偏低。(3)不同人口学特征、旅游依存度的居民感知及满意度存在显著差异。从事旅游业的居民收入和满意度最高,旅游富民作用和不足兼有。(4)与定居民族比,游牧民族在移民后生产生活方式变化更大。最后,提出改善居民经济条件,加强其知识、技能培训,社区赋权,完善生态补偿机制建议。
        For heritage researchers,decision makers and residents,it is a common concern whether the ecological migration in the heritage site can realize the ecological protection and the sustainable development of tourism,and improve people's livelihood.A comprehensive assessment of the effect of ecological migration from the perspective of residents' perception and satisfaction is helpful to provide the feedback in tackling such concerns.The questionnaire survey and thorough interviewing method were applied in four immigrant communities in Bogda region,one of the four areas of Xinjiang Tianshan world heritage,Xinjiang,China to evaluate the migration effect from perspective of residents' perception and satisfaction.The ecological migration perception is divided into four dimensions:Economic impact,social and cultural impact,environmental impact and psychological impact.The four communities are mainly Kazak immigrant communities,they have industry typicality and their distance to the heritage site is different.A total of 310 questionnaires were distributed and 295 questionnaires were valid.The effective rate was 95.16%.The data were analyzed with factor analysis,two independent sample T test and single factor variance analysis using software SPSS19.0 the results showed that the majority of interviewees were Kazak ethnic groups(96.90%),and their educational level was low.There are 86.8% of households with annual incomes below 40 000 Yuan RMB and they are positioned in the low and middle income levels.There are 42.8 percent of families having tourism professionals,and those with "tourism income accounts for the proportion of household income" in the range from 71 percent to 100 percent,are up to 25.80 percent.Tourism is an important economic source of community migration near the heritage site,and even the entire economic source of some families.Residents are against the high rate of economic positive effects and psychological positive effects,and had divergent views on social impact perception,and highly accepted the positive environment effect.The results show that the ecological environment protection is effective,but the residents' income and quality of life are not improved,and the residents have a weak sense of community attachment.Residents' satisfaction is low.Residents' approval rate of income,occupation,tourism status,welfare,environment,medical care,training and other indicators was lower than the rejection rate.More than 70% of residents are dissatisfied with the status quo of tourism,income and current occupation.The satisfaction about current income was the lowest,with an approval rate of 9.2%.There are significant differences in residents' perception and satisfaction for their different demographic characteristics and different tourism dependency.Residents engaged in tourism have the highest income and satisfaction.The benefits of tourism are most obvious compared with agricultural cultivation,caged animal husbandry and other industries.At the same time,there are some deficiencies in the tourism industry,such as industry instability,limited employment opportunities,low level of tourism participation,and absence of residents.Compared with the settlement nation,larger changes of production and life style occurred after migration,from nomadic herding,to tourism,agriculture,animal husbandry,and work,etc.After immigration,the livelihood of the residents became monotonous.Finally,the suggestion is proposed which includes improving economic condition of residents,such as increasing employment opportunities,livelihood diversity and allowing the moderate grazing; strengthening their training of knowledge and skills and the community empowerment; and improving ecological compensation mechanism.
引文
[1] 税伟,徐国伟,兰肖雄,等.生态移民国外研究进展[J].世界地理研究,2012,21(1):150-157.[SHUI Wei,XU Guowei,LAN Xiaoxiong,et al.A review of study on ecological migrant[J].World Regional Studies,2012,21(1):150-157.]
    [2] 陈静梅.国内生态移民研究述评(1990—2014)[J].贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版),2015,(3):94-101.[CHEN Jingmei.A review of research on domestic ecological migrant Chinese ecosystem emigrant(1990—2014)[J].Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Social Science),2015,(3):94-101.]
    [3] ROWLES G D,WATKINS J F.Elderly migration and development in small communities[J].Growth & Change,1993.24(4):509-538.
    [4] 唐宏,张新焕,杨德刚.农户生态移民意愿及影响因素研究——基于新疆三工河流域的农户调查[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(10):1658-1669.[TANG Hong,ZHANG Xinhuan,YANG Degang,et al.Study on ecoiogicai migration willingness and its affecting factors:A case of Sangonghe River watershed,Xinjiang[J].Journal of Natural Resource,2011,26(10):1658-1669.]
    [5] 时鹏,余劲,加贺爪优,等.基于农户视角的生态移民搬迁意愿及影响因素探析[J].中国水土保持,2012(11):7-9.[SHI Peng,YU Jin,JIAHE Zhuayou,et al.An analysis of the willingness of ecological migration and its influencing factors from the perspective of farmers[J].Soil and Water Conservation in China,2012,(11):7-9.]
    [6] 时鹏,余劲.农户生态移民意愿及影响因素研究——以陕西省安康市为例[J].中国农业大学学报,2013,18(1):218-228.[SHI Peng,YU Jin.Study on ecological migration willingness and its influencing factors:A case of Ankang,Shaanxi[J].Journal of China Agricultural University,2013,18(1):218-228.]
    [7] 张荣飞,王建力,李昌晓,等.基于PRA方法调查的农户对生态移民现状的反馈——以宁夏黄河流域五堆子第一安置点为例[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2013,30(4):157-164.[ZHANG Rongfei,Wang Jianli,Li Changxiao,et al.Farmers’ feedback on current situation about Ningxia ecological immigration based on the method of PRA:The first relocation site in Ningxia Yellow River Valley’s Wuduizi as an Example[J].Journal of Chongqing Normal University(Natural Science),2013,30(4):157-164.]
    [8] 任善英,朱广印,王艳,等.牧区生态移民社会适应研究述评[J].生态经济,2014,30(9):96-99.[REN Shanying,ZHU Guanyin,WANG Yan,et al.Review on the studies of the adaptability in the pastoral ecological emigrants society[J].Ecological Economy,2014,30(9):96-99.]
    [9] 邓慧丽,苗红,孔云霄,等.宁夏生态移民家庭碳足迹调查与影响因素研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(4):154-160.[DENG Huili,MIAO Hong,KONG Yunxiao,et al.Research on carbon footprint of ecomigration family and its influence factors in Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(4):154-160.]
    [10] 李屹峰,罗玉珠,郑华,等.青海省三江源自然保护区生态移民补偿标准[J].生态学报,2013,33(3):764-770.[LI Yifeng,LUO Yuzhu,ZHENG Hua,et al.Standard of payments for ecosystem services in Sanjiangyuan Natural Reserve[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(3):764-770.]
    [11] 刘红.三江源生态移民补偿机制与政策研究[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2013,33(6):101-105.[LIU Hong.Study on compensation mechanism and policy of ecological migration in Sanjiangyuan[J].Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences),2013,33(6):101-105.]
    [12] 张越,李双奎,夏淼,等.生态移民工程中的移民满意度实证研究——以宁夏泾灵新村为例[J].宁夏社会科学,2014,(5):54-61.[ZHANG Yue,LI Shuangkui,XIA Miao,et al.An empirical study on the resettlement satisfaction in ecological resettlement project:A case study of Mingzhong Village of Zhongwei City in Ningxia[J].Social Sciences in Ningxia,2014,(5):54-61.]
    [13] 张伟,张爱国.生态移民后农业生产变化情况及满意度研究——以宁夏中卫市鸣钟村为例[J].安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016,25(4):25-29.[ZHANG Wei,ZHANG Aiguo.Change of agricultural production and people’s satisfaction after ecological migration:Taking the Mingzhong Village of Zhongwei City in Ningxia as an example[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition),2016,25(4):25-29.]
    [14] 杨永梅,郭志林,洪荣昌,卓玛措.基于因子分析的格尔木市郊工程移民满意度评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(9):38-43.[YANG Yongmei,GUO Zhilin,HONG Rongchang,et al.Satisfaction evaluation on the engineering immigrants in Golmud suburban based on factor analysis[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2013,27 (9):38-43.]
    [15] 闫喜凤,林强.大小兴安岭森林生态功能区生态移民效益评价研究——以伊春市美溪区为例[J].黑龙江环境通报,2014,38(2):20-22.[YAN Xifeng,LIN Qiang.Research on benefits of eco-emigration of forest ecological function area on Daxingan Mountain and Xiaoxingan Mountain:With Meixi District of Yichun City as example[J].Heilongjiang Environmental Journal,2014,38(2):20-22.]
    [16] 薛晨浩,邓慧丽,苗红,等.TOPSIS视角下西北生态移民社区自然灾害社会脆弱性评价——以宁夏为例[J].开发研究,2016,183(2):90-94.[XUE Chenhao,DENG Huili,MIAO Hong,et al.From the perspective of TOPSIS,social vulnerability assessment of natural disasters in northwest ecological immigrant communities:A case study of Ningxia[J].Development Research,2016,183(2):90-94.]
    [17] 张丽君,王菲.中国西部牧区生态移民后续发展对策探析[J].中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,38(4):31-36.[ZHANG Lijun,WANG Fei.A probe into the developmental countermeasure after ecological migration in the western pasturing region of China[J].Journal of Minzu University of China (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2011,38(4):31-36.]
    [18] ROSS S,WALL G.Evaluating ecotourism:The case of North Sulawesi,Indonesia[J].Tourism Management,1999,20(6):673-682.
    [19] JANUCHOWSKI-HARTLEY S R,MOON K,STOECKL N,et al.Social factors and private benefits influence landholders’ riverine restoration priorities in tropical Australia[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2012,110:20-26.
    [20] 张灿强,闵庆文,田密.农户对农业文化遗产保护与发展的感知分析——来自云南哈尼梯田的调查[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,17(1):128-135,148.[ZHANG Canqiang,MIN Qingwen,TIAN Mi.Analysis of farmers’ perception on the protection and development of agricultural heritage system:based on investigation of Hani Rice Terrace in Yunnan[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition),2017,17(1):128-135,148.]
    [21] 王艳,彭婧,党晶晶.移民的迁移意愿与生活期望——基于宁夏生态移民调查数据的Logistic回归分析[J].西北人口,2017,38(4):116-121.[WANG Yan,PENG Jing,DANG Jingjing.The migration intentions of migrants and life expectancy:Based on the Logistic regression analysis of ecological migrant survey data[J].Northwest population,2017,38(4):116-121.]
    [22] 张文彬,李国平.生态补偿、心理因素与居民生态保护意愿和行为研究——以秦巴生态功能区为例[J].资源科学,2017,39(5):881-892.[ZHANG Wenbing,LI Guoping.Ecological compensation,psychological factors,willingness and behavior of ecological protection in the Qinba ecological function area[J].Resources Science,2017,39(5):881-892.]
    [23] 王昌海,崔丽娟,毛旭锋,等.湿地保护区周边农户生态补偿意愿比较[J].生态学报,2012,32(17):5345-5354.[WANG Changhai,CUI Lijuan,MAO Xufeng,et al.Comparative studies on the farmers’ willingness to accept eco-compensation in wetlands nature reserve[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2012,32(17):5345-5354.]
    [24] 张方圆,赵雪雁,田亚彪,等.社会资本对农户生态补偿参与意愿的影响——以甘肃省张掖市、甘南藏族自治州、临夏回族自治州为例[J].资源科学,2013,35(9):1821-1827.[ZHANG Fangyuan,ZHAO Xueyan,TIAN Yabiao,et al.Social capital and farmer willingness to participate in ecological compensation for three sites in Gansu[J].Resources Science,2013,35(9):1821-1827.]
    [25] 李惠梅,张安录.基于福祉视角的生态补偿研究[J].生态学报,2013,33(4):1065-1070.[LI Huimei,ZHANG Anlu.Ecological compensation boosted ecological protection and human well-being improvement[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(4):1065-1070.]
    [26] 蒋依依,宋子千,张敏.旅游地生态补偿研究进展与展望[J].资源科学,2013,35(11):2194-2201.[JIANG Yiyi,SONG Ziqian,ZHANG Min.Tourism ecological compensation:Progress and prospects[J].Resources Science,2013,35(11):2194-2201.]
    [27] 李青,薛珍,陈红梅,等.基于CVM理论的塔里木河流域居民生态认知及支付决策行为研究[J].资源科学,2016,38(6):1075-1087.[LI Qing,XUE Zhen,CHEN Hongmei,et al.Cognitive ecology and payment decision-making behavior based on the theory of CVM in the Tarim River Basin[J].Resources Science,2016,38(6):1075-1087.]
    [28] 刘亚萍,赫雪姣,金建湘,等.基于二分式诱导技术的WTP值测算与偏差分析——以广西北部湾经济区滨海生态环境保护为例[J].资源科学,2014,36(1):156-165.[LIU Yaping,HE Xuejiao,JIN Jianxiang,et al.An application of dichotomous induction technology in WTP estimate and deviation analysis for coastal resource protection in the Guangxi Beibu Gulf Economic Zone[J].Resources Science,2014,36(1):156-165.]
    [29] 姚晓军,孙美平,张明军.宝天高速公路沿线生态环境保护居民支付意愿评价[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(2):404-409.[YAO Xiaojun,SUN Meiping,ZHANG Mingjun.Assessment of average willingness to pay for preserving the ecology and environment along Baotian highway[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2010,19(2):404-409.]
    [30] HALKOS G,MATSIORI S.Environmental attitude,motivations and values for marine biodiversity protection[J].Journal of Behavioral & Experimental Economics,2017,69:61-70.
    [31] VERONESI M,CHAWLA F,MAURER M,et al.Climate change and the willingness to pay to reduce ecological and health risks from wastewater flooding in urban centers and the environment[J].Ecological Economics,2014,98(2):1-10.
    [32] ROBERTS M,HANLEY N,CRESSWELL W.User fees across ecosystem boundaries:Are SCUBA divers willing to pay for terrestrial biodiversity conservation?[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2017.200:53-59.
    [33] SUZIANA H.Environmental attitudes and preference for wetland conservation in Malaysia[J].Journal for Nature Conservation,2017,37:133-145.
    [34] 李惠梅,张安录,王珊,等.三江源牧户参与草地生态保护的意愿[J].生态学报,2013,33(18):5943-5951.[LI Huimei,ZHANG Anlu,WANG Shan,et al.Herdsmen’s willingness to participate in ecological protection in Sanjiangyuan Region,China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(18):5943-5951.]
    [35] WANG S J,CAO W H.Climate change perspectives in an alpine area,Southwest China:A case analysis of local residents’ views[J].Ecological Indicators,2015,53:211-219.
    [36] 邵景安,邵全琴,芦清水,等.山江湖地区农民参与政府主导生态建设工程的“生态—经济”效应感知[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(8):1323-1335.[SHAO Jing’an,SHAO Quanqin,LU Qingshui,et al.The perception of farmers to eco-economic effects after their participating in government leading ecological construction projects:A case of mountain-river-lake of Jiangxi[J].Journal of natural resources,2014,29(8):1323-1335.]
    [37] 黄晓园,罗辉.自然保护区民族村寨保护政策认知和意愿研究——以高黎贡山自然保护区周边民族村寨为例[J].云南行政学院学报,2012,14(3):139-142.[HUANG Xiaoyuan,LUO Hui.A study on cognition and willingness of protection policies for ethnic villages in nature reserves:A case study of ethnic villages around Gaoligong Mountain Nature Reserve[J].Journal of Yunnan university of administration,2012,14
    [38] 王丛丛.世界遗产地居民对旅游生态移民影响的感知研究[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2011.[WANG Congcong.A study on the impact of residents of world heritage sites on tourism ecological migration[D].Changsha:Hunan Normal Univerdity,2011.]
    [39] 王凯,欧艳,葛全胜.世界遗产地居民对生态移民影响的感知——以武陵源3个移民安置区为例[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(6):1663-1670.[WANG Kai,OU Yan,GE Quansheng.Perception of residents in world heritage site to the effects of ecological migration:A case study of three migrant resettlement spots in Wulingyuan,Hunan Province of south-central China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2012,23(6):1663-1670.]
    [40] 王凯,欧艳,黎梦娜,等.遗产旅游地生态移民影响的实证研究——以武陵源风景名胜区为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(4):399-405.[WANG Kai,OU Yan,LI Mengna,et al.An analysis of the impact of ecological migration at world heritage destinations:A case study of Wulingyuan scenic area[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2012,21(4):399-405.]
    [41] 王凯,李志苗,易静.生态移民户与非移民户的生计对比——以遗产旅游地武陵源为例[J].资源科学,2016,38(8):1621-1633.[WANG Kai,LI Zhimiao,YI Jing.Contrasting the livelihoods of immigrants and non-immigrants in the Wulingyuan world heritage area[J].Resources Science,2016,38(8):1621-1633.]
    [42] TANG H,YANG D G,ZHANG X H,et al.Ecological migration effects on the Tianchi Scenic Area in Xinjiang:From the perspective of migrant farmer families[J].Journal of Arid Land,2012,4(1):95-104.
    [43] 唐宏,杨德刚,张新焕,等.新疆三工河流域生态移民的农户响应[J].地理科学进展,2011,30(4):463-469.[TANG Hong,YANG Degang,ZHANG Xinhuang,et al.Respond of farm household to eco-immigration in Sangong River Basin of Xinjiang[J].Progress in geography,2011,30(4):463-469.]
    [44] 韩国圣,张捷,黄跃雯,等.天堂寨景区农村社区居民旅游影响感知的差异分析[J].地理科学,2011,31(12):1525-1532.[HAN Guosheng,ZHANG Jie,HUANG Yuewen,et al.Evaluation of difference in rural residents’ conception on tourism impact:A case study of Tiantangzhai Scenic Spot[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica,2011,31(12):1525-1532.]
    [45] KIM K.The effects of tourism impacts upon quality of life of residents in the community[D].Blacksburg,Virginia:Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,2002.
    [46] LEE T H.Influence analysis of community resident support for sustainable tourism development[J].Tourism Management,2013.34:37-46.
    [47] 汪侠,甄峰,吴小根,等.旅游开发的居民满意度驱动因素——以广西阳朔县为例[J].地理研究 ,2010,29(5):841-851.[WANG Xia,ZHEN Feng,WU Xiaogen,et al.Driving factors of resident satisfaction with tourism development:A case study of Yangshuo in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region[J].Geographical Research,2010,29(5):841-851]
    [48] 赵超.生态移民对旅游业的感知差异研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2012.[ZHAO Chao.A study on the perception difference of ecological migration to tourism[J].Xi’an:Shaanxi Normal University.2012.]
    [49] 孙九霞.赋权理论与旅游发展中的社区能力建设[J].旅游学刊,2008,23(9):22-27.[SUN Jiuxia.Empowerment theory and the construction of community capability in the development of tourism[J].Tourism Tribune,2008,23(9):22-27.]
    (1)博格达哈萨克民族风情旅游有限责任公司是居民入股组建的旅游企业,简称毡房公司
    (2)西域公司,是博格达最大的旅游经营企业
    (3)阿肯是哈萨克族诗歌的创作者、演唱者和传播者。他们一般能够触景生情、出口成章。阿肯弹唱是哈萨克草原上主要的娱乐方式之一,每逢节日喜庆、婚嫁礼仪都要举行隆重的阿肯弹唱,随着旅游业的兴起,阿肯弹唱作为一种民俗风情旅游将成为主要内容之一

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700