基于DEA定量表征低渗透砂岩储层成岩相——以鄂尔多斯盆地演武地区延长组8~1段为例
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Quantitative evaluation of low-permeability sandstone diagenetic facies based on DEA method:A case study of Chang 8~1 reservoirs in the Yanwu region,Ordos basin
  • 作者:马宝全 ; 杨少春 ; 张鸿 ; 白青林 ; 杨兆林
  • 英文作者:MA Baoquan;YANG Shaochun;ZHANG Hong;BAI Qinglin;YANG Zhaolin;School of Geosciences,China University of Petroleum;Laboratory for Marine Mineral Resources,Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology;Reservoir Geology Key Laboratory of Shandong Province;Research Institute of Exploration and Development,PetroChina Liaohe Oilfield Company;Research Institute of Exploration and Development,PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company;
  • 关键词:鄂尔多斯盆地 ; 演武地区 ; 成岩相 ; 数据包络分析 ; 储层质量评价
  • 英文关键词:Ordos basin;;Yanwu area;;diagenetic facies;;data envelopment analysis;;reservoir quality evaluation
  • 中文刊名:ZGKD
  • 英文刊名:Journal of China University of Mining & Technology
  • 机构:中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院;海洋国家实验室海洋矿产资源评价与探测技术功能实验室;山东省油藏地质重点实验室;中国石油辽河油田勘探开发研究院;中国石油长庆油田勘探开发研究院;
  • 出版日期:2017-09-06 13:52
  • 出版单位:中国矿业大学学报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.47;No.221
  • 基金:国家重大专项(2017ZX05009001)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZGKD201802016
  • 页数:10
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:32-1152/TD
  • 分类号:148-157
摘要
成岩相是控制储层质量的主要因素之一,成岩相的定量表征对储层区域评价和预测具有重要作用.本文以鄂尔多斯盆地演武地区延长组81段储层为研究对象,选择与岩石学特征参数、成岩作用强度和孔隙发育程度等相关的15个成岩相定量评价参数,利用数据包络分析法(DEA)定量表征成岩相;以研究区内各成岩相对应储层为表征单元,利用区内各成岩相的表征参数构成评价群体并确立数学模型,综合考虑影响成岩相定量表征的每个参数进行线性规划模型求解.研究结果表明:5种成岩相指数的分布区间分别为1.00~0.85,0.85~0.60,0.60~0.50,0.50~0.35,0.35~0,具有很好的区间对应关系,且成岩相指数与吸水强度呈现正相关,与剩余油饱和度呈现负相关.其中有利成岩相为绿泥石衬边弱溶蚀成岩相和不稳定组分溶蚀成岩相,指数在1.00~0.60,其孔喉配置关系相对较好,孔隙度主要分布在10%~17%,渗透率大体分布在0.50~10.00mD,驱油效率较高,剩余油饱和度较低.
        Diagenetic facies is one of the main factors controlling the reservoir quality.The quantitative characterization of diagenetic facies plays an important role in reservoir evaluation and prediction.This paper selected Chang 81 reservoir of Yanwu area in Ordos basin as the objective layer,quantitatively evaluated the diagenetic facies by applying the data envelopment analysis(DEA)on 15 selected parameters relevant to petrographic characteristics,diagenetic processes and pore structure etc.Taking the corresponding reservoirs of the diagenetic facies as the characterization units,the evaluation group and the numerical model were established by characterization parameters of all diagenetic facies.Then each parameter affecting the quantitative characterization was considered to solve the linear programming model.The results suggest that there are five intervals of diagenetic facies indexes,they are 1.00—0.85,0.85—0.60,0.60—0.50,0.50—0.35 and 0.35—0,which have good relationship corresponding to the diagenetic facies.The diagenetic facies indexes show a positive correlation with the absorption intensity and a negative correlation with the residual oil saturation.The diagenetic facies of weak corrosion with chlorite mat and of corrosion with unstable components are favorable reservoirs in the Yanwu region.The diagenetic facies indexes of them range from 1.00 to 0.60,with higher oil displacement efficiency and lower residual oil saturation.The pore-throat system is good,with the porosity ranging from 10% to 17% and the permeability ranging from0.50 to 10.00 mD.
引文
[1]FREBCH M W,WORDEN R H,MARIANI E,et al.Microcrystalline quartz generation and the preservation of porosity in sandstones:Evidence from the Upper Cretaceous of the Subhercynian Basin,Germany[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2012,82(6):422-434.
    [2]TAYLOR T R,GILES M R,HATHON L A,et al.Sandstone diagenesis and reservoir quality prediction:models,myths and reality[J].AAPG Bulletin,2010,94(8):1093-1132.
    [3]夏鲁,刘震,刘静静,等.低渗及致密砂岩含油程度动态评价方法研究:鄂尔多斯盆地南部地区延长组为例[J].中国矿业大学学报,2016,45(6):1193-1203.XIA Lu,LIU Zhen,LIU Jingjing,et al.Research on the dynamic evaluation method for oil-bearing degree of low-permeability and tight sandstone reservoirs:a case from the Yanchang formation of south Ordos basin[J].Journal of China University of Mining&Technology,2016,45(6):1193-1203.
    [4]孙雨,于海涛,马世忠,等.致密砂岩储层物性特征及控制因素:以松辽盆地大安地区白垩系泉头组四段为例[J].中国矿业大学学报,2017,46(4):809-819.SUN Yu,YU Haitao,MA Shizhong,et al.Physical property of tight sandstone reservoir and its controlling factors:A case study of the fourth member of Cretaceous Quantou formation in Da’an area of Songliao basin[J].Journal of China University of Mining&Technology,2017,46(4):809-819.
    [5]张响响,邹才能,朱如凯,等.川中地区上三叠统须家河组储层成岩相[J].石油学报,2011,32(2):257-264.ZHANG Xiangxiang,ZOU Caineng,ZHU Rukai,et al.Reservoir diagenetic facies of the upper Triassic Xujiahe formation in the central Sichuan basin[J].Acta Petroleum Sinica,2011,32(2):257-264.
    [6]石玉江,肖亮,毛志强,等.低渗透砂岩储层成岩相测井识别方法及其地质意义:以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长8段储层为例[J].石油学报,2011,32(5):820-827.SHI Yujiang,XIAO Liang,MAO Zhiqiang,et al.An identification method for diagenetic facies with well logs and its geological significance in low-permeability sandstones:A case study on Chang 8reservoirs in the Jiyuan region,Ordos basin[J].Acta Petroleum Sinica,2011,32(5):820-827.
    [7]邹才能,侯连华,匡立春,等.准噶尔盆地西缘二叠—三叠系扇控成岩储集相成因机理[J].地质科学,2007,42(3):587-601.ZOU Caineng,HOU Lianhua,KUANG Lichun et al.Genetic mechanism of diagenesis-reservoir facies of the fan-controlled premo-triassic in the western marginal area,Junggar basin[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2007,42(3):587-601.
    [8]邹才能,陶士振,薛叔浩,等.“相控论”的内涵及其勘探意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(6):7-12.ZOU Caineng,TAO Shizhen,XUE Shuhao,et al.Connotation of“Fades Control Theory”and its significance for exploration[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2005,32(6):7-12.
    [9]陈彦华,刘莺.成岩相:储集体预测的新途径[J].石油实验地质,1994,16(3):274-281.CHEN Yanhua,LIU Ying.Diagenetic facies:A new approach to the prediction of reservoir rocks[J].Experiment Petroleum Geology,1994,16(3):274-281.
    [10]邹才能,陶士振,周慧,等.成岩相的形成、分类与定量评价方法[J].石油勘探与开发,2008,35(5):526-540.ZOU Caineng,TAO Shizhen,ZHOU Hui,et al.Genesis,classification and evaluation method of diagenetic facies[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2008,35(5):526-540.
    [11]赖锦,王贵文,王书南,等.碎屑岩储层成岩相研究现状及发展[J].地球科学进展,2013,28(1):39-50.LAI Jin,WANG Guiwen,WANG Shunan,et al.Research status and advances in the diagenetic facies of clastic reservoirs[J].Advances in Earth Science,2013,28(1):39-50.
    [12]李锦,杜向前,李佳樽,等.基于多参数定量评价的低渗透砂岩成岩相划分:以鄂尔多斯盆地张韩地区长21储层为例[J].断块油气田,2016,23(5):554-559.LI Jin,DU Xiangqian,LI Jiazun,et al.Diagenetic facies classification of low permeability sandstone based on multi-parameter quantitative evaluation:Taking Chang 21 reservoir of Ordos basin as an example[J].Fault-Block Oil&Gas Field,2016,23(5):554-559.
    [13]李士祥,褚美娟,黄锦绣,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长8油层组砂体结构特征及成因机理[J].沉积学报,2013,34(3):435-444.LI Shixiang,CHU Meijuan,HUANG Jinxiu,et al.Characteristics and genetic mechanism of sandbody architecture in Chang-8oil layer of Yanchang formation,Ordos basin[J].Acta Petroleum Sinica,2013,34(3):435-444.
    [14]韩文学,侯连华,姚泾利,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7段致密砂岩储层特征及成因机理[J].中国矿业大学学报,2016,45(4):765-771,793.HAN Wenxue,HOU Lianhua,YAO Jingli,et al.Characteristics and formation mechanism of Chang 7tight sandstone reservoir in Ordos basin[J].Journal of China University of Mining&Technology,2016,45(4):765-771,793.
    [15]刘伟,窦齐丰,黄述旺,等.成岩作用的定量表征与成岩储集相研究:以科尔沁油田交2断块区九佛堂组(J-(3jf))下段为例[J].中国矿业大学学报,2002,31(5):399-403.LIU Wei,DOU Qifeng,HUANG Shuwang,et al.Quantitative characterization of diagenesis and diagenesis reservoir facies:The case study of lower member of J-3jf of Jiao 2block in Kerqin oilfield[J].Journal of China University of Mining&Technology,2002,31(5):399-403.
    [16]张创,孙卫,高辉,等.鄂尔多斯盆地华池长8储层成岩相与孔隙度演化[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报),2014,39(4):411-420.ZHANG Chuang,SUN Wei,GAO Hui,et al.Reservoir diagenetic facies and porosity evolution pathways of chang 8formation in Huachi,Ordos basin[J].Editorial Committee of Earth Science(Journal of China University of Geosciences),2014,39(4):411-420.
    [17]邹才能,张光亚,陶士振,等.全球油气勘探领域地质特征、重大发现及非常规石油地质[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(2):129-145.ZOU Caineng,ZHANG Yaguang,TAO Shizhen,et al.Formation,distribution,potential and prediction of global conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resources[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(2):129-145.
    [18]孟元林,高建军,刘德来,等.渤海湾盆地西部凹陷南段成岩相分析与优质储层预测[J].沉积学报,2006,24(2):185-189.MENG Yuanlin,GAO Jianjun,LIU Delai,et al.Diagenetic facies analysis and high-quality reservoir prediction in the southern Xibu depression of the Bohaiwan basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2006,24(2):185-192.
    [19]张响响,邹才能,陶士振,等.四川盆地广安地区上三叠统须家河组四段低孔渗砂岩成岩相类型划分及半定量评价[J].沉积学报,2010,28(1):50-57.ZHANG Xiangxiang,ZOU Caineng,TAO Shizhen,et al.Diagenetic facies types and semiquantitative evaluation of low porosity and permeability sandstones of the fourth member Xujiahe formation Guang’an area,Sichuan basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2010,28(1):36-42.
    [20]马鹏杰,林承焰,张世奇,等.碎屑岩储集层中绿泥石包膜的研究现状[J].古地理学报,2017,19(1):147-159.MA Pengjie,LIN Chengyan,ZHANG Shiqi,et al.An overview on study of chlorite films in clastic reservoirs[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2017,19(1):147-159.
    [21]钟广法,林社卿,侯方浩.泌阳凹陷核三下亚段砂岩成岩作用及储集性[J].矿物岩石,1996,15(2):40-46.ZHONG Guangfa,LIN Sheqing,HOU Fanghao.Diagenesis and its reservoir quality for sandstones of lower He-3 Member(Paleogene)East Biyang depression,Henan,China[J].Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology,1996,15(2):40-46.
    [22]兰叶芳,黄思静,吕杰.储层砂岩中自生绿泥石对孔隙结构的影响:来自鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组的研究结果[J].地质通报,2011,30(1):134-140.LAN Yefang,HUANG Sijing,LJie.2011.Influences of authigenic chlorite on pore structure in sandstone reservoir:A case study from Upper Triassic Yanchang formation in Ordos basin,China[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2011,30(1):134-140.
    [23]兰叶芳,邓秀琴,程党性,等.鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区长6油层组砂岩成岩相及储层质量评价[J].岩石矿物学杂志,2014,33(1):51-63.LAN Yefang,DENG Xiuqin,CHENG Dangxing,et al.Diagenetic facies and reservoir quality evaluation of Chang 6sandstone reservoir in the upper Triassic Yanchang formation of Huaqing area,Ordos basin[J].Acta Petrologica ET Mineralogica,2014,33(1):51-63.
    [24]CHARNES A,COOPER W W,RHODES E.Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1978,2(6):429-444.
    [25]黄思静,郎咸国,兰叶芳,等.储层孔隙度-渗透率关系曲线中的截止孔隙度与储层质量[J].成都理工大学(自然科学版),2011,38(6):593-602.HUANG Sijing,LANG Xianguo,LAN Yefang,et al.Porosity cutoff of porosity-permeability curve and the reservoir quality[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science&Technology Edition),2011,38(6):593-602.
    [26]魏权龄.数据包络分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:75-118.WEI Quanling.Data envelopment analysis[M].Beijing:Science Press,2004:75-118.
    [27]KAO C.Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis:A relational model[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2009,192(3):949-962.
    [28]KAO C,HUANG S N.Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis:an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2008,185(1):418-429.
    [29]黄祎.基于DEA的多子系统单元相对效率评价模型研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2009:35-99.HUANG Yi.The research on relative efficiency evaluation models for multi-subsystem DUM based on DEA[D].Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology,2009:35-99.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700